View clinical trials related to Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic.
Filter by:Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) combined with endoscopic papillary sphinctomy (EST) is the preferred clinical treatment for common bile duct stones, and this minimally invasive treatment technique has been widely used in clinical practice for decades. However, even after successful stone removal by EST combined with various methods, the incidence of postoperative recurrent bile duct stones can still be as high as 9.8%~30% . The emergence of these long-term complications after EST surgery is currently thought to be related to the loss of Oddi sphincter function. In clinical practice, the investigators tried a new method to repair the Oddi sphincter, that is, after ERCP+EST stone removal, a metal clip was inserted into the endoscopic clamp through the duodenoscopy, and clamp precisely on both lateral edges of the nipple after incision. This procedure is called endoscopic nipple clipping (ECPP). Initial explorations in animal and human trials showed good results, with 3 weeks after clipping of the incised nipple not only showing scar repair of the nipple shape and structure, but also confirmed the recovery of sphincter function by Oddi sphincter manometry, the Oddi's sphincter basal pressure, contraction frequency and contraction amplitude were able to return to the pre-EST level. In summary, the investigators designed a single-center randomized controlled trial to explore and verify the clinical effect of ECPP on the prevention of recurrent bile duct stones within one year by comparing the incidence of recurrent bile duct stones within one year after EST surgery. By observing the changes of intestinal biliary reflux, biliary bacterial colonization, biliary microecology and bile metabolism after EST surgery, the pathogenesis of long-term complications such as recurrent bile duct stones after EST surgery was further sought.
Very large bile duct stones are difficult to remove. Dilation-assisted stone extraction, also termed small endoscopic sphincterotomy plus endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation, is safe and effective technique for the treatment of large CBD stones. However, in approximately 5-10% of patients, the removal of large bile duct stones may be difficult. For this selected group of patients for whom all conventional endoscopic stone treatment devices have failed, laser lithotripsy technology has provided an approach to the fragmentation of difficult bile duct stones. A single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC) system (SpyGlass Direct Visualization System, Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, MA, USA) has overcome most of the conventional cholangioscopy limitations. The investigators aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Spyglass-guided laser lithotripsy for difficult CBD stones not amenable to conventional dilation-assisted stone extraction therapy.
Endoscopic cholangiography is a procedure which is performed to image the bile duct and perform therapy like removal of bile duct stones. It is currently standard of care to remove stones from the bile duct when found as they frequently cause complications like infections which can sometime be life threatening. Therapy on the biliary tree, like for example stone removal, frequently requires inserting tools through the opening of the duct and cutting of the muscle which control the secretion of juices from the liver. Cutting the muscle helps with securing an easy access to the bile duct. It also helps facilitating dragging the stones out. On certain occasions placing a wire in the bile duct fails and instead the wire keeps entering the pancreatic duct whose opening is adjacent to the bile duct opening. There is evidence to suggest that keeping a wire in the pancreatic duct facilitates placing a second wire in the bile duct possibly because it straightens the duct. On certain occasions this also fails and we resort to cutting the muscle of the pancreas and the bile duct simultaneously to facilitate the access to the bile duct. The more attempt to enter the bile duct the higher the risk of inflammation in the pancreas known as pancreatitis. This makes decreasing the number of attempts at placing the wire in the duct desirable. One way to facilitate placement of the wire in the bile duct is to cut starting from the opening of the pancreas duct aiming toward the bile duct muscle. This often cuts the bile duct sphincter and exposes the bile duct opening. The study is trying to answer if cutting the bile duct sphincter muscle in the direction of the bile duct immediately after a wire has entered the pancreatic duct will make it easier to place the wire in the bile duct as compared to trying to place the wire in the bile duct without cutting the opening. While cutting the muscle canincrease the risk of pancreatitis, repeated attempts at accessing the bile duct can also increase the risk of pancreatitis. So if cutting the pancreatic muscle will facilitate entry to the bile duct and decrease the number of attempts at entering the bile duct then it might be a better way to approach the patient whom we had difficulty in entering the bile duct.