Solid Tumor Clinical Trial
— AIP2021Official title:
Feasibility and Safety of the Use of Acupuncture in the Prevention of Late-onset Diarrhea Associated With Irinotecan in Pediatric Patients With Solid Tumors: Controlled Pilot Study
To evaluate the feasibility of an acupuncture protocol in the prevention of late diarrhea due to irinotecan in pediatric patients with solid tumors, a pre-post pilot study will be conducted. Pre-post pilot study non-randomized, open label, single arm study. There will be a single study group that will be used at the same time as your own control. The intervention will take place for approximately one year.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 21 |
Est. completion date | December 31, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | September 30, 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 0 Years to 18 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Patients from 0 to 18 years old with solid tumors who start treatment in our center with irinotecan at 50 mg/m2/intravenous dose in day hospital. - Blood tests prior to the start of the appropriate chemotherapy cycle to receive acupuncture with continuous stimulation needle insertion: neutrophils greater or equal to 1000 cells/mm3 and platelets greater than or equal to 50,000 cells/mm3. - Signature of informed consent by parents in the case of children under 12 years of age and assent of the minor. - Signature of informed consent in the case of those over 12 years of age Exclusion Criteria: - Participate in a clinical trial that is developed in the Pediatric Oncology Area of the Hospital Sant Joan de Deu where acupuncture intervention is not permitted. - Have received acupuncture treatment in the last ten days. - Receive concomitant abdominal radiotherapy. - Have diarrhea on day 1 of the cycle |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Spain | Hospital Sant Joan de Deu | Esplugues De Llobregat | Barcelona |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Fundació Sant Joan de Déu |
Spain,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Pain intensity during the procedure | Evaluation of pain intensity during the insertion procedure of the indwelling needles. The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years). Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 1 | |
Primary | Pain intensity during the procedure | Evaluation of pain intensity during the insertion procedure of the indwelling needles. The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years). Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 5 | |
Secondary | Pain intensity during the intervention | Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted. It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major. The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years). Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 1 | |
Secondary | Pain intensity during the intervention | Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted. It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major. The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years). Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 2 | |
Secondary | Pain intensity during the intervention | Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted. It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major. The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years). Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 3 | |
Secondary | Pain intensity during the intervention | Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted. It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major. The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years). Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 4 | |
Secondary | Pain intensity during the intervention | Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted. It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major. The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years). Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 5 | |
Secondary | Pain intensity during the intervention | Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted. It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major. The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years). Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 6 | |
Secondary | Pain intensity during the intervention | Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted. It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major. The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years). Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 7 | |
Secondary | Pain intensity during the intervention | Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted. It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major. The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years). Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 8 | |
Secondary | Pain intensity during the intervention | Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted. It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major. The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years). Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 9 | |
Secondary | Side effects | Registry of other local adverse effects of acupuncture. will be delivered families recorded some items on day 9 of the second cycle (intervention cycle): local infection, hematoma, and skin damage. | Day 9 | |
Secondary | Degree of severity of diarrhea | Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 1 | |
Secondary | Degree of severity of diarrhea | Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 2 | |
Secondary | Degree of severity of diarrhea | Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 3 | |
Secondary | Degree of severity of diarrhea | Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 4 | |
Secondary | Degree of severity of diarrhea | Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 5 | |
Secondary | Degree of severity of diarrhea | Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 6 | |
Secondary | Degree of severity of diarrhea | Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 7 | |
Secondary | Degree of severity of diarrhea | Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 8 | |
Secondary | Degree of severity of diarrhea | Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 9 | |
Secondary | Degree of severity of diarrhea | Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 10 | |
Secondary | Degree of severity of diarrhea | Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 11 | |
Secondary | Degree of severity of diarrhea | Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 12 | |
Secondary | Degree of severity of diarrhea | Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 13 | |
Secondary | Degree of severity of diarrhea | Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 14 | |
Secondary | Dose of antidiarrheal drugs | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 1 | |
Secondary | Dose of antidiarrheal drugs | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 2 | |
Secondary | Dose of antidiarrheal drugs | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 3 | |
Secondary | Dose of antidiarrheal drugs | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 4 | |
Secondary | Dose of antidiarrheal drugs | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 5 | |
Secondary | Dose of antidiarrheal drugs | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 6 | |
Secondary | Dose of antidiarrheal drugs | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 7 | |
Secondary | Dose of antidiarrheal drugs | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 8 | |
Secondary | Dose of antidiarrheal drugs | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 9 | |
Secondary | Dose of antidiarrheal drugs | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 10 | |
Secondary | Dose of antidiarrheal drugs | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 11 | |
Secondary | Dose of antidiarrheal drugs | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 12 | |
Secondary | Dose of antidiarrheal drugs | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 13 | |
Secondary | Dose of antidiarrheal drugs | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 14 | |
Secondary | Prophylactic regimen of cefixime | Prophylactic regimen of cefixime before starting the cycle of irinotecan and the use of regimen prolonged 10 days. (Yes/No) | Day 1 | |
Secondary | Abdominal pain treatment-related | Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 1 | |
Secondary | Abdominal pain treatment-related | Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 2 | |
Secondary | Abdominal pain treatment-related | Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 3 | |
Secondary | Abdominal pain treatment-related | Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 4 | |
Secondary | Abdominal pain treatment-related | Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 5 | |
Secondary | Abdominal pain treatment-related | Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 6 | |
Secondary | Abdominal pain treatment-related | Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 7 | |
Secondary | Abdominal pain treatment-related | Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 8 | |
Secondary | Abdominal pain treatment-related | Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 9 | |
Secondary | Abdominal pain treatment-related | Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 10 | |
Secondary | Abdominal pain treatment-related | Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 11 | |
Secondary | Abdominal pain treatment-related | Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 12 | |
Secondary | Abdominal pain treatment-related | Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 13 | |
Secondary | Abdominal pain treatment-related | Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 14 | |
Secondary | Satisfaction degree | Degree of satisfaction with acupuncture through a qualitative survey. Three items Yes/No and free comments | Day 15 | |
Secondary | Determination of the UGT1A1 polymorphism | Determination of the UGT1A1 polymorphism by blood sample in the analysis of routine performed on day 1 of the first cycle of irinotecan (control cycle). | Day 1 | |
Secondary | Nausea | Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) | Day 1 | |
Secondary | Nausea | Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) | Day 2 | |
Secondary | Nausea | Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) | Day 3 | |
Secondary | Nausea | Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) | Day 4 | |
Secondary | Nausea | Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) | Day 5 | |
Secondary | Nausea | Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) | Day 6 | |
Secondary | Nausea | Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) | Day 7 | |
Secondary | Nausea | Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) | Day 8 | |
Secondary | Nausea | Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) | Day 9 | |
Secondary | Nausea | Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) | Day 10 | |
Secondary | Nausea | Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) | Day 11 | |
Secondary | Nausea | Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) | Day 12 | |
Secondary | Nausea | Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) | Day 13 | |
Secondary | Nausea | Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) | Day 14 | |
Secondary | Vomiting | Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) | Day 1 | |
Secondary | Vomiting | Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) | Day 2 | |
Secondary | Vomiting | Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) | Day 3 | |
Secondary | Vomiting | Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) | Day 4 | |
Secondary | Vomiting | Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) | Day 5 | |
Secondary | Vomiting | Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) | Day 6 | |
Secondary | Vomiting | Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) | Day 7 | |
Secondary | Vomiting | Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) | Day 8 | |
Secondary | Vomiting | Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) | Day 9 | |
Secondary | Vomiting | Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) | Day 10 | |
Secondary | Vomiting | Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) | Day 11 | |
Secondary | Vomiting | Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) | Day 12 | |
Secondary | Vomiting | Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) | Day 13 | |
Secondary | Vomiting | Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) | Day 14 | |
Secondary | Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 1 | |
Secondary | Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 2 | |
Secondary | Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 3 | |
Secondary | Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 4 | |
Secondary | Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 5 | |
Secondary | Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 6 | |
Secondary | Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 7 | |
Secondary | Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 8 | |
Secondary | Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 9 | |
Secondary | Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 10 | |
Secondary | Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 11 | |
Secondary | Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 12 | |
Secondary | Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 13 | |
Secondary | Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) | Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. | Day 14 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05691608 -
MoleculAr Profiling for Pediatric and Young Adult Cancer Treatment Stratification 2
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05580991 -
Intratumoral CAN1012(Selective TLR7 Agonist) in Subjects With Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02846038 -
Understanding Communication in Healthcare to Achieve Trust (U-CHAT)
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05159388 -
A Study of PRS-344/S095012 (PD-L1x4-1BB Bispecific Antibody-Anticalin Fusion) in Patients With Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03181854 -
Randomized Controlled Trial of Integrated Early Palliative Care
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05981703 -
A Study Investigating BGB-26808 Alone or in Combination With Tislelizumab in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06014502 -
Study to Evaluate IMGS-001 Treatment in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04107311 -
Prospective Analysis of Intestinal Microbiome and Autoimmune Panels as Predictors of Toxicity in ImmunOncology Patients
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04078152 -
Durvalumab Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Study
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02250157 -
A Dose-regimen Finding Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Activity of Oratecan in Subjects With Advanced Malignancies
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05566574 -
A Study of RP-3500 in Combination With Standard Radiation Therapy in People With Solid Tumor Cancer
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03943004 -
Trial of DFP-14927 in Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06036836 -
Study of Favezelimab Coformulated With Pembrolizumab (MK-4280A) in Participants With Selected Solid Tumors (MK-4280A-010)
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05798546 -
Treatment of Advanced Solid Tumors With Neo-T(GI-NeoT-02)
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05525858 -
KPMNG Study of MOlecular Profiling Guided Therapy Based on Genomic Alterations in Advanced Solid Tumors II
|
||
Terminated |
NCT04586335 -
Study of CYH33 in Combination With Olaparib an Oral PARP Inhibitor in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors.
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00479128 -
Bortezomib With Gemcitabine/Doxorubicin in Patients With Urothelial Cancer and Other Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04143789 -
Evaluation of AP-002 in Patients With Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04550663 -
NKG2D CAR-T(KD-025) in the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory NKG2DL+ Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03980041 -
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy/Safety of IPI-549 in Combination With Nivolumab in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (MARIO-275)
|
Phase 2 |