Impact of E-cigarette Nicotine Concentration on Compensation

Smoking Cessation Clinical Trial

Official title:

Impact of E-cigarette Nicotine Concentration on Compensation, Cigarette Smoking, and Biomarkers of Exposure and Harm in Diverse Smokers

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05887947
• Other study ID #: 147694
• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: February 20, 2023
• Est. completion date: February 20, 2025

Study information

• Verified date: June 2024
• Source: University of Kansas Medical Center
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The study will be the first to assess the impact of nicotine concentration on compensatory puffing (total inhaled volume), nicotine delivery, and switch patterns (percent exclusive EC, dual cig-EC, and cig only users) with an explicit focus on AA and White smokers.

Description:

1. E-cigarettes (ECs) are projected to exceed combustible cigarette use within two years. Policy makers, health officials, and regulators are concerned that newer nicotine salt-based Ecs that use high concentrations of nicotine in their e-liquids are a major reason for this rapid growth in use. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has regulatory authority to set appropriate tobacco product standards to protect public health and has shown interest in exploring a product standard limiting the level of nicotine in e-liquids. While this regulatory consideration has merit, emerging research suggests it may be misguided, leading to a product that is just as addictive but more harmful. Specifically, among users of earlier, freebase nicotine Ecs (i.e., cig-a-like, tank systems), use of low nicotine e-liquids was associated with a 9-fold increase in e-liquid consumption and all of its related toxicants, likely due to compensatory puffing. The consequences of consuming more e-liquid because of lower nicotine concentration remains an important knowledge gap. Moreover, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine have concluded that completely substituting Ecs for cigarettes results in less short-term harm than continued smoking, but the impact of low versus high nicotine concentration e-liquids on a smokers' ability to completely switch to Ecs (versus become 'dual users' or continue smoking) is currently unknown. African American (AA) smokers, who take larger puffs, inhale more intensely, and extract more nicotine and harmful constituents per cigarette smoked, may be particularly impacted by nicotine product standards placed on EC - i.e., greater compensatory puffing and more e-liquid and related toxicant consumption at lower e-liquid concentrations. Unfortunately, the vast majority of information on Ecs and potential product standards come from white populations and have largely ignored African American (AA) smokers who bear a disproportionate burden of tobacco-related morbidity and mortality. As the FDA considers regulatory action to limit the level of nicotine in e-liquids to protect public health, it is critical that research considers vulnerable populations and does not widen disparities.

The long-term goal is to inform a tobacco landscape that will minimize tobacco-related harms and downstream health inequities. The overall objective of this application is to understand the impact of e-liquid nicotine concentration on compensatory puffing, EC and cigarette use patterns (exclusive EC, dual EC-cig, exclusive cig), and resultant exposure to biomarkers of harm among AA and white smokers. Adult AA and white smokers will complete two study phases. In Phase 1, using a randomized crossover design, participants will complete two standardized, 10-puff vaping bouts over 5 mins followed by a 60-minute ad libitum vaping session, using two e-liquids that differ only by nicotine concentration (5% vs. 1.8%) to examine the effect of nicotine concentration on in-lab compensatory puffing, nicotine exposure, and e-liquid consumption. In Phase 2, the same participants will be randomized to 5% or 1.8% nicotine e-liquid and instructed to switch completely for 6 weeks to examine the impact of nicotine concentration on short-term, real-world EC use patterns and related biomarkers of exposure (e.g., exhaled carbon monoxide, 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL), lung inflammatory markers). The central hypothesis is that, compared to the high nicotine concentration, while vaping the low nicotine concentration, users will engage in compensatory puffing, resulting in greater e-liquid consumption (Phase 1). Moreover, rates of dual use and continued smoking will be higher for the low (versus high) nicotine concentration and will result in greater exposure to toxicants (Phase 2).

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Enrollment: 48
• Est. completion date: February 20, 2025
• Est. primary completion date: February 20, 2025
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 21 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. identify as non-Hispanic white or non-Hispanic African American/Black

2. willing to switch from smoking to e-cigarettes for 6 weeks

3. speak and understand English

4. smoke greater than or equal to 25 of the last 30 days for the past 3 months

5. not previously used an e-cigarette for longer than 30 days

6. exhaled carbon monoxide of greater than or equal to 6ppm at screener visit

7. willing to abstain from marijuana for 12 hours prior to in-person lab visits

8. willing to abstain from smoking and vaping for 12 hours prior to 3 in-person lab visits

Exclusion Criteria:

1. weekly use of an EC over the last six months

2. use of tobacco products other than cigarettes on greater than or equal to 10 days in the past 30 days

3. use of EC on more than 5 of the past 30 days

4. current use of cessation medications

5. pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or breastfeeding

6. past 30 day hospitalization/ER visit for psychiatric issue, seizure, stroke, or new heart problem

7. recent history of cardiovascular or pulmonary events in the past three months

8. treatment for alcohol or drug dependence in the past year

9. household member currently or previously enrolled in the study

10. current enrollment in a program aimed at changing smoking patterns

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Smoking Cessation

Intervention

Other:
• Electronic Cigarette Nicotine Concentration Order 1.8% 5% 1.8%
At lab visit 1 participants receive 1.8% electronic cigarette pod nicotine concentration during the 10-puff standardized puff bout and 60-minute ad libitum session. After a washout period of at least 48 hours, at lab visit 2 participants receive 5% electronic cigarette pod nicotine concentration during the 10-puff standardized puff bout and 60-minute ad libitum session. After a washout period of at least 7 days, during phase two, participants received 1.8% electronic cigarette pod nicotine concentration for 6 weeks of home use.
• Electronic Cigarette Nicotine Concentration Order 1.8% 5% 5%
At lab visit 1 participants receive 1.8% electronic cigarette pod nicotine concentration during the 10-puff standardized puff bout and 60-minute ad libitum session. After a washout period of at least 48 hours, at lab visit 2 participants receive 5% electronic cigarette pod nicotine concentration during the 10-puff standardized puff bout and 60-minute ad libitum session. After a washout period of at least 7 days, during phase two, participants received 5% electronic cigarette pod nicotine concentration for 6 weeks of home use.
• Electronic Cigarette Nicotine Concentration Order 5% 1.8% 1.8%
At lab visit 1 participants receive 5% electronic cigarette pod nicotine concentration during the 10-puff standardized puff bout and 60-minute ad libitum session. After a washout period of at least 48 hours, at lab visit 2 participants receive 1.8% electronic cigarette pod nicotine concentration during the 10-puff standardized puff bout and 60-minute ad libitum session. After a washout period of at least 7 days, during phase two, participants received 1.8% electronic cigarette pod nicotine concentration for 6 weeks of home use.
• Electronic Cigarette Nicotine Concentration Order 5% 1.8% 5%
At lab visit 1 participants receive 5% electronic cigarette pod nicotine concentration during the 10-puff standardized puff bout and 60-minute ad libitum session. After a washout period of at least 48 hours, at lab visit 2 participants receive 1.8% electronic cigarette pod nicotine concentration during the 10-puff standardized puff bout and 60-minute ad libitum session. After a washout period of at least 7 days, during phase two, participants received 5% electronic cigarette pod nicotine concentration for 6 weeks of home use.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	University of Kansas Medical Center	Kansas City	Kansas

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Kansas Medical Center

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (18)

Brett EI, Miller MB, Leavens ELS, Lopez SV, Wagener TL, Leffingwell TR. Electronic cigarette use and sleep health in young adults. J Sleep Res. 2020 Jun;29(3):e12902. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12902. Epub 2019 Sep 4. — View Citation

Busch AM, Leavens EL, Wagener TL, Buckley ML, Tooley EM. Prevalence, Reasons for Use, and Risk Perception of Electronic Cigarettes Among Post-Acute Coronary Syndrome Smokers. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2016 Sep-Oct;36(5):352-7. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000179. — View Citation

Leavens EL, Brett EI, Frank S, Shaikh RA, Leffingwell TR, Croff JM, Wagener TL. Association between breath alcohol concentration and waterpipe lounge patrons' carbon monoxide exposure: A field investigation. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Jan 1;170:152-155. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Nov 16. — View Citation

Leavens EL, Driskill LM, Molina N, Eissenberg T, Shihadeh A, Brett EI, Floyd E, Wagener TL. Comparison of a preferred versus non-preferred waterpipe tobacco flavour: subjective experience, smoking behaviour and toxicant exposure. Tob Control. 2018 May;27(3):319-324. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053344. Epub 2017 Apr 5. — View Citation

Leavens ELS, Brett EI, Morgan TL, Lopez SV, Shaikh RA, Leffingwell TR, Wagener TL. Descriptive and injunctive norms of waterpipe smoking among college students. Addict Behav. 2018 Feb;77:59-62. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Sep 18. — View Citation

Leavens ELS, Lechner WV, Stevens EM, Miller MB, Meier E, Brett EI, Moisiuc A, Hale JJ, Wagener TL. Electronic cigarette and combustible cigarette use following a campus-wide ban: Prevalence of use and harm perceptions. J Am Coll Health. 2020 May-Jun;68(4):332-335. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1551803. Epub 2019 Jan 25. — View Citation

Leavens ELS, Meier E, Brett EI, Stevens EM, Tackett AP, Villanti AC, Wagener TL. Polytobacco use and risk perceptions among young adults: The potential role of habituation to risk. Addict Behav. 2019 Mar;90:278-284. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 8. — View Citation

Leavens ELS, Meier E, Tackett AP, Miller MB, Tahirkheli NN, Brett EI, Carroll DM, Driskill LM, Anderson MP, Wagener TL. The impact of a brief cessation induction intervention for waterpipe tobacco smoking: A pilot randomized clinical trial. Addict Behav. 2018 Mar;78:94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.10.023. Epub 2017 Oct 28. — View Citation

Leavens ELS, Morgan TL, Brett EI, Patzkowsky K, Son J, Molina N, Eissenberg T, Shihadeh A, Leffingwell TR, Wagener TL. Concurrent Alcohol Use and Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking: Smoking Topography, Toxicant Exposure, and Abuse Liability. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Feb 6;22(2):280-287. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz032. — View Citation

Leavens ELS, Smith TT, Natale N, Carpenter MJ. Electronic cigarette dependence and demand among pod mod users as a function of smoking status. Psychol Addict Behav. 2020 Nov;34(7):804-810. doi: 10.1037/adb0000583. Epub 2020 Apr 16. — View Citation

Leavens ELS, Stevens EM, Brett EI, Hebert ET, Villanti AC, Pearson JL, Wagener TL. JUUL electronic cigarette use patterns, other tobacco product use, and reasons for use among ever users: Results from a convenience sample. Addict Behav. 2019 Aug;95:178-183. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Feb 18. — View Citation

Leavens ELS, Stevens EM, Brett EI, Leffingwell TR, Wagener TL. JUUL in school: JUUL electronic cigarette use patterns, reasons for use, and social normative perceptions among college student ever users. Addict Behav. 2019 Dec;99:106047. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106047. Epub 2019 Jul 9. — View Citation

Stevens EM, Hebert ET, Tackett AP, Leavens ELS, Wagener TL. Harm Perceptions of the JUUL E-Cigarette in a Sample of Ever Users. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 2;17(13):4755. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134755. — View Citation

Tackett AP, Leavens ELS, Wiedenmann A, Perez MN, Baker A, Mayes S, Mullins LL, Wagener TL. Preliminary exploration of secondhand smoke exposure in youth with Sickle Cell Disease: biochemical verification, pulmonary functioning, and health care utilization. Psychol Health Med. 2019 Jan;24(1):35-42. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2018.1516294. Epub 2018 Sep 11. — View Citation

Wagener TL, Avery JA, Leavens ELS, Simmons WK. Associated Changes in E-cigarette Puff Duration and Cigarettes Smoked per Day. Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Mar 19;23(4):760-764. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa211. — View Citation

Wagener TL, Leavens ELS, Mehta T, Hale J, Shihadeh A, Eissenberg T, Halquist M, Brinkman MC, Johnson AL, Floyd EL, Ding K, El Hage R, Salman R. Impact of flavors and humectants on waterpipe tobacco smoking topography, subjective effects, toxicant exposure and intentions for continued use. Tob Control. 2020 May 13:tobaccocontrol-2019-055509. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055509. Online ahead of print. — View Citation

Waseh S, Dicker AP. Telemedicine Training in Undergraduate Medical Education: Mixed-Methods Review. JMIR Med Educ. 2019 Apr 8;5(1):e12515. doi: 10.2196/12515. — View Citation

Wedel AV, Stevens EM, Molina N, Leavens ELS, Roberts C, Wagener TL. Examining pregnant smokers' attitudes toward cessation aids and electronic nicotine delivery systems. J Okla State Med Assoc. 2018 Oct;111(8):812-816. — View Citation

* Note: There are 18 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Total inhaled volume	Differences within participants in total inhaled volume in electronic cigarette puff topography during the pharmacokinetic portions of lab visit 1 and 2	2-10 days between visits