Small Intestine Disease Clinical Trial
— NAVIPILLOfficial title:
Multicenter Study Comparing the Artificial Intelligence-Based Navicam Endoscopic Capsule With the Conventional Pillcam Endoscopic Capsule in Small Bowel Pathology
Since its introduction in 2001, small bowel capsule endoscopy has been pivotal in diagnosing small bowel pathology due to its minimally invasive nature and high diagnostic accuracy. However, the technology has limitations, including prolonged reading times and the need for specialized endoscopists. The Navicam endoscopic capsule, leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) with ProScan™ for automated reading, promises to address these limitations by reducing reading times and enhancing diagnostic efficiency. This study aims to assess the diagnostic concordance and to compare the efficiency of the AI-based Navicam capsule with the conventional Pillcam SB3 in the exploration of the small bowel.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 147 |
Est. completion date | December 31, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | June 1, 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Outpatients over 18 years of age with any clinical indication to undergo a small bowel exploration using capsule endoscopy at the participating hospital. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with known small bowel strictures detected by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). - Patients with a history of esophagogastric and small bowel surgery (excluding ileocecal resection). - Patients with a clinical contraindication for small bowel capsule endoscopy. - Hospitalized patients. - Patients with pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD). - Patients scheduled for a MRI within 15 days after capsule endoscopy ingestion. - Pregnant or actively breastfeeding patients. - Patients with swallowing disorders requiring endoscopic placement of the capsule. - Simultaneous participation in another clinical trial using any investigational drug or device. - Concurrent life-threatening pathology or condition. - Inability to sign the informed consent form. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Spain | Hospital General Universitario Dr Balmis | Alicante | |
Spain | Hospital Clínic de Barcelona | Barcelona | |
Spain | Hospital del Mar | Barcelona | |
Spain | Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR-Sant Pau) | Barcelona | |
Spain | Hospital Universitario de Galdakao | Bilbao | |
Spain | Hospital General Universitario Virgen la Arrixaca | El Palmar | |
Spain | Hospital General Universitario de Elche | Elche | |
Spain | Hospital Clínico San Carlos | Madrid | |
Spain | Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón | Madrid | |
Spain | Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer | Murcia | |
Spain | Hospital Universitario Son Espases | Palma De Mallorca | |
Spain | Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria | Santa Cruz De Tenerife | |
Spain | Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena | Sevilla | |
Spain | Hospital de Terrassa | Terrassa | |
Spain | Hospital General Universitario de Valencia | Valencia | |
Spain | Hospital Universitario i Politècnic La Fé | Valencia |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona | Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy |
Spain,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Concordance correlation coefficient in small bowel exploration (per-patient analysis) | To assess the concordance (k agreement) between Navicam (with ProscanTM AI-system) and Pillcam endoscopic capsule device in detecting patients with at least one significant small bowel lesion. | From the start of recording up to 12 hours afterward | |
Secondary | Correlation coefficient in lesion detection (per-lesion analysis) | To assess the correlation between Navicam (AI-tool Proscan) and Pillcam in detecting small bowel lesions. | From the start of recording up to 12 hours afterward | |
Secondary | Reading time in minutes | To compare reading times of the small bowel between Navicam (Proscan) and Pillcam SB3. | From the start of recording up to 12 hours afterward | |
Secondary | Transit times in minutes | To compare gastric, small bowel, and colonic transit times between Navicam and Pillcam SB3. | From the start of recording up to 12 hours afterward | |
Secondary | Adverse events related to Navicam and/or Pillcam SB3 | Describe any adverse events during small bowel exploration. | From the start of recording up to 24 hours afterward |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05069233 -
Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy in Visualization of the UGI and Small Intestine
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04390633 -
Perception of Needs of Patients With Chronic Intestinal Failure and Their Practitioners: a Qualitative Study
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05450393 -
Data Collection of PillCamTM SB3 Capsule Endoscopy and Device-Assisted Enteroscopy Routine Care Procedures (GPS Study)
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03771508 -
Prospective Collection of PillCam SB3 Videos and Raw Data Files for Future Developments (SODA)
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05470946 -
Evaluation of the Diagnostic Role of Enteroscopy in Small Intestinal Diseases at Al-Rajhi University Hospital
|
N/A |