Small-cell Lung Cancer Clinical Trial
Official title:
"A Phase II Trial of Hippocampal-Sparing Cranial Irradiation (PCI) for Small-Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)"
Verified date | September 2021 |
Source | Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The Investigators are looking to compare standard treatment for the management of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) which is prophylactic cranial Irradiation (PCI) (shown to be very good in patient survival) with cranial sparing PCI. Although standard of care PCI is successful in patient survival it also has neurologic side-effects. The Investigators are hoping the cranial sparing PCI has the same positive survival results with the added benefit of lowering neurological side-effects.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 20 |
Est. completion date | March 18, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | March 18, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 100 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Patient must have newly diagnosed and confirmed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) - Patient must have a performance status of 1 or higher - Patients must not have received previous irradiation to the brain - Patients must have limited stage disease with complete response to chemotherapy and consolidative chest radiotherapy that was documented at least on standard chest x-rays within one month of study entry - Negative MRI or CT scan of the brain at least one month before protocol entry - Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test and also agree to use adequate contraceptives while on protocol - Patient must be able to understand and sign the informed consent document - Patient must be informed of the investigational aspect to this trial prior to singing the informed consent document Exclusion Criteria: - Patients receiving prior external beam irradiation to the head or neck, including any form of stereotactic irradiation - Radiographic evidence of brain metastases and/or ipsilateral lung metastases/malignant pleural effusion - Planned concurrent chemotherapy or antitumoral agent during PCI - Concomitant malignancy or malignancy within the past five years other than nonmelanomatous skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix - Patients with minimal pleural effusion evident on chest X-ray; minimal pleural effusion visible on chest CT is allowed. - Patients with epilepsy requiring permanent oral medication - Patients must not have a serious medical or psychiatric illness that would, in the opinion of the investigator, prevent informed consent or completion of protocol treatment, and/or follow-up visits. - Patients may not take Memantine. This is the only eligibility criterion that has been added to those of RTOG 0212, since some physicians might now prescribe Memantine. This medication would not have been given at the time of enrollment on RTOG 0212 and its administration could confound the results of this study. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Bayview Medical Center | Baltimore | Maryland |
United States | The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins | Baltimore | Maryland |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Effect of Hippocampal-sparing Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation (PCI) on Possible Delayed Recall Toxicity as Assessed by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) for Delayed Recall | The primary endpoint of this study is cognitive function or memory. Memory is measured by participant performance on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised for delayed recall (HVLT-R-Delayed Recall) at 6 months following hippocampal-sparing PCI. The HVLT-Delayed minimum and Maximum scores are 0-12. A higher score means a better outcome. | Baseline, 6 months and 12 months post radiation treatment | |
Secondary | Compare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCI | Composite cognitive function following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to a historical control receiving standard PCI.
HVLT-R Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) Total Recall (0-36) higher = better Delayed Recall (0-12) higher = better Discrimination (-12 to 12) higher = better Trail Making A & B (0-300 seconds) higher = poorer Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA) (0-180) higher = better Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) (0-30) higher = better Perceptual Comparison Test (PCT) (0-128) higher = better Brief Test of Attention (BTA) (0-20) higher = better Calibrated Ideational Fluency Assessment (CIFA) Letter Word Fluency (0-120) higher = better Category Word Fluency (0-120) higher = better Verbal Fluency (0-240) higher = better Learning and Memory Verbal Composite T score (mean = 100, standard deviation = 15), higher = better Visual Composite T score (mean = 100, standard deviation = 15), higher = better |
Baseline | |
Secondary | Compare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCI | Composite cognitive function following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to a historical control receiving standard PCI.
HVLT-R Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) Total Recall (0-36) higher = better Delayed Recall (0-12) higher = better Discrimination (-12 to 12) higher = better Trail Making A & B (0-300 seconds) higher = poorer Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA) (0-180) higher = better Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) (0-30) higher = better Perceptual Comparison Test (PCT) (0-128) higher = better Brief Test of Attention (BTA) (0-20) higher = better Calibrated Ideational Fluency Assessment (CIFA) Letter Word Fluency (0-120) higher = better Category Word Fluency (0-120) higher = better Verbal Fluency (0-240) higher = better Learning and Memory Verbal Composite T score (mean = 100, standard deviation = 15), higher = better Visual Composite T score (mean = 100, standard deviation = 15), higher = better |
6 months post radiation treatment | |
Secondary | Compare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCI | Composite cognitive function following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to a historical control receiving standard PCI.
HVLT-R Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) Total Recall (0-36) higher = better Delayed Recall (0-12) higher = better Discrimination (-12 to 12) higher = better Trail Making A & B (0-300 seconds) higher = poorer Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA) (0-180) higher = better Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) (0-30) higher = better Perceptual Comparison Test (PCT) (0-128) higher = better Brief Test of Attention (BTA) (0-20) higher = better Calibrated Ideational Fluency Assessment (CIFA) Letter Word Fluency (0-120) higher = better Category Word Fluency (0-120) higher = better Verbal Fluency (0-240) higher = better Learning and Memory Verbal Composite T score (mean = 100, standard deviation = 15), higher = better Visual Composite T score (mean = 100, standard deviation = 15), higher = better |
12 months post radiation treatment | |
Secondary | Compare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 | Evaluate quality of life following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to historical control receiving standard PCI. Difference between 6 months and baseline.
Questions on the Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) assessment are on a four-point scale from "not at all" to "very much". Raw scores are linearly converted to a 0-100 scale with higher scores reflecting higher levels of function and higher levels of symptom burden. Questions on the QLQ-C30 cover the following: Dyspnoea Insomnia Appetite Constipation Diarrhoea Finances Fatigue Nausea/Vomiting Pain Physical Function Role Function Emotional Function Cognitive Function Social Function Global QoL |
Baseline and 6 months post radiation treatment | |
Secondary | Compare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment QLQ-C30 | Evaluate quality of life following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to historical control receiving standard PCI. Difference between 12 months and baseline.
Questions on the Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) assessment are on a four-point scale from "not at all" to "very much". Raw scores are linearly converted to a 0-100 scale with higher scores reflecting higher levels of function and higher levels of symptom burden. Questions on the QLQ-C30 cover the following: Dyspnoea Insomnia Appetite Constipation Diarrhoea Finances Fatigue Nausea/Vomiting Pain Physical Function Role Function Emotional Function Cognitive Function Social Function Global QoL |
Baseline and 12 months post radiation treatment | |
Secondary | Compare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20) | Evaluate quality of life following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to historical control receiving standard PCI. Difference between 6 months and baseline.
Questions on the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20) are rated on a four-point scale ('not at all', 'a little', 'quite a bit' and 'very much'), and are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores represent more severe symptoms. Questions on the QLQ-BN20 cover the following: Headaches Seizures Drowsy Hair loss Itching Weakness Bladder Future Uncertainty Visual Disorder Motor Dysfunction Communication Deficit |
Baseline and 6 months post radiation treatment | |
Secondary | Compare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Using the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20). | Evaluate quality of life following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to historical control receiving standard PCI. Difference between 12 months and baseline.
Questions on the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20) are rated on a four-point scale ('not at all', 'a little', 'quite a bit' and 'very much'), and are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores represent more severe symptoms. Questions on the QLQ-BN20 cover the following: Headaches Seizures Drowsy Hair loss Itching Weakness Bladder Future Uncertainty Visual Disorder Motor Dysfunction Communication Deficit Headaches Seizures Drowsy Hair loss Itching Weakness Bladder Future Uncertainty Scale Visual Disorder Scale Motor Dysfunction Scale Communication Deficit Scale |
Baseline and 12 months post radiation treatment | |
Secondary | Number Participants With Hippocampus Brain Metastases Following Sparing PCI | The number of participants with brain metastases after sparing PCI treatment was assessed to be compared to two existing studies. | 12 months | |
Secondary | Assess if Development of Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis Following Sparing PCI is Higher Than Expected | Determine whether development of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis following hippocampal-sparing PCI is higher than expected. | 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months post radiation treatment | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Surviving Following Hippocampal-sparing PCI | To evaluate the survival rates of study participants following hippocampal-sparing PCI. | Up to 24 months post radiation treatment |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04242199 -
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of INCB099280 in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05552846 -
Phase II Trial of Consolidative Thoracic Radiotherapy for ES-SCLC After Standard Care of Chemo-immunotherapy
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT04022876 -
A Study of ALRN-6924 for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-induced Side Effects (Chemoprotection)
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06022757 -
Study of XNW5004 Tablet in Combination With KEYTRUDA® (Pembrolizumab) in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors Who Failed Standard Treatments (KEYNOTE F19)
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04923776 -
Liver Directed RT + Chemo-immunotherapy for ES-SCLC
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04168281 -
Watchful Observation of Patients With LD-SCLC Instead of the PCI
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03239171 -
Bioinformation Therapy for Lung Cancer
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06457906 -
SRS/SRT/Hypo-RT Versus HA-WBRT for No More Than 10 Brain Metastases in SCLC
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04539977 -
PD-L1 Antibody (TQB2450) Plus Chemotherapy for Previously Untreated Limited- Stage Small-cell Lung Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03345485 -
Study of the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of EDO-S101, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06103682 -
LOcally ABLatIve ThErapy for OligopRogressive Lung And Thoracic MalignanciEs (OBLITERATE)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04170946 -
Talazoparib and Thoracic RT for ES-SCLC
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03523234 -
Neoadjuvant Therapy Combined With Radical Surgery for the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) in II and IIIA Stage
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05620134 -
Study of JK08 in Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Cancer
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05578326 -
Study of Trilaciclib and Lurbinectidin
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06255197 -
Characteristics, Treatment Patterns and Outcomes for Patients With Surgically Resected Lung Cancers
|
||
Terminated |
NCT04610658 -
Immune Checkpoint Inhibition With Lurbinectedin Relapsed/Recurrent SCLC
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04116320 -
Focused Ultrasound Ablation and PD-1 Antibody Blockade in Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05091567 -
A Phase III, Open-Label Study of Maintenance Lurbinectedin in Combination With Atezolizumab Compared With Atezolizumab in Participants With Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT04596033 -
TiTAN-1: Safety, Proliferation and Persistence of GEN-011 Autologous Cell Therapy
|
Phase 1 |