Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05697757 |
Other study ID # |
STUDY00016960 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
January 13, 2023 |
Est. completion date |
June 30, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
January 2024 |
Source |
Arizona State University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This study aims to investigate the effect of a dynamic lighting intervention on sleep
quality, circadian activity rhythms, and mood in older adults with dementia living in
long-term care facilities. The dynamic lighting intervention is designed to create an ambient
illumination that provides a high level of circadian stimulation in the morning and
circadian-neutral lighting in the evenings through delivering varying light intensity and
spectrum.
Description:
Light is the most important environmental element that is not only necessary to fulfill
visual tasks but also is the main stimulus that regulates circadian rhythms. Daily exposure
to proper lighting at the right time is reported as an effective non-pharmacological
treatment to improve sleep disorders in various age groups including older adults. Several
clinical studies have demonstrated the benefits of bright light therapy to improve sleep
duration and sleep efficiency at night and reduce daytime sleepiness and behavioral
disturbance (i.e., agitation, depression) in older adults. In most of these studies, lighting
intervention includes a lightbox that exposes participants to an extra lighting source with
specific characteristics (i.e., blue-enriched bright light) for only a few hours without
considering the impacts of other lighting sources that individuals are exposed to throughout
the day. A significant impediment to administrating bright light therapy for older adults
with dementia is that these individuals typically require reminders to remain seated and
awake in front of a lightbox long enough to benefit from the bright light exposure. An
alternative way to deliver bright light is through providing circadian-effective ambient
lighting. The circadian system responds best to high-intensity short-wavelength light (peak
wavelength of 480 nm). However, the lighting design in long-term care facilities does not
necessarily provide adequate intensity and spectrum to stimulate circadian rhythms in elder
residences. Studies reported poor lighting conditions in nursing homes. According to these
studies, daytime lighting in these institutions is not even sufficient to fulfill older
adults' visual needs, while light at night is relatively often excessive. Thus, this study
will be carried out to achieve the following aims:
Aim1: Investigate the effect of a dynamic lighting condition on circadian activity rhythms
and selected sleep parameters in older adults with dementia.
Aim2: Evaluate the effect of a dynamic lighting condition on mood.
Findings from this study will provide initial guidance to the designers and administration of
memory care facilities as to the lighting design recommendations of greatest benefits to the
sleep, mood, and well-being of institutionalized older adults diagnosed with dementia.
The participants will be recruited from two memory care facilities from the greater Phoenix
area, based on the recommendation of the managers at the memory care facilities.
Environment: In this study, the human-lighting interaction will occur in the common areas of
the selected memory care facilities where older adults with dementia spend most of the
daytime hours under the supervision of facility caregivers. Research personnel will install
experimental luminaires in the memory care facility's common area. During this visit,
research personnel will also give a number of actigraphs and light trackers (which will be
used for data collection throughout the study) to caregivers and instruct them on how to use
these devices on participants. Participants will also be instructed (by caregivers) on how to
use each device.
Week 1 (Baseline): Patterns of sleep, moods, and light exposure will be monitored ad libitum
for one week. The experimental luminaires will remain off during Week 1. Placing luminaires
in the common area of the facility prior to the use of lighting interventions during Weeks 2
to 7 will minimize environmental variations between baseline and intervention measurements
(e.g., new luminaires in the room) and decrease the bias resulting from the Hawthorne effect
on collected data.
Weeks 2-7 (Intervention): The intervention period will start right after the baseline and
continue for six constructive weeks. There are two lighting interventions, each of which is
three weeks long. We will randomly assign one of the residences to start with (Dynamic >
Placebo) lighting intervention while the other start with (Placebo > Dynamic) lighting
intervention. Actigraphy will be conducted only on the last 7 days of each condition. Light
spectrum and intensity will be tracked continuously throughout the waking hours (Blue Iris
mobile sensor). Moreover, caregivers will complete CSDD and CMAI every seven days to assess
the short and long-term effects of each condition on mood and agitation of older adult
participants.