Sleep Disorder Manage in Emotional Freedom Techniques vs Sleep Hygiene Education Group Therapy

Sleep Disorder Clinical Trial

Official title:

Effectiveness of Emotional Freedom Techniques vs Sleep Hygiene Education Group Therapy (SHE) in Management of Sleep Disorders Among Elderly

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05276635
• Other study ID #: 0305317/2021
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 3, 2021
• Est. completion date: March 31, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: March 2022
• Source: Matrouh University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Sleep disorders are common among elderly persons, with deleterious effects on their physical and mental health. Many approaches are used to manage such disorders. Aim of the study: To compare the Emotional Freedom Techniques-Insomnia (EFT-I) and Sleep Hygiene Education (SHE) group therapy as two treatments for insomnia in a geriatric population when delivered, and their effects on sleep quality, depression, and life satisfaction.

Description:

Background: Sleep disorders are common among elderly persons, with deleterious effects on their physical and mental health. Many approaches are used to manage such disorders. Aim of the study: To compare the Emotional Freedom Techniques-Insomnia (EFT-I) and Sleep Hygiene Education (SHE) group therapy as two treatments for insomnia in a geriatric population when delivered, and their effects on sleep quality, depression, and life satisfaction. Participants and methods: This open-label randomized controlled trial study was conducted at Elabbasia Mental Hospital and Osana family wellness elderly nursing home at Maadi, Cairo. It included 60 elderly patients suffering insomnia sleep problem randomized into two equal groups: one group received a Sleep Hygiene Education (SHE) intervention, the other had a form of Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) adapted for use with insomnia (EFT-I). A self-administered questionnaire with tools for sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI]), depression, and life satisfaction was used to collect data. The fieldwork was from January to March 2021.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 60
• Est. completion date: March 31, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: March 21, 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 60 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• patients suffering insomnia sleep problem

• Age equal or more than 60 years

Exclusion Criteria:

• Those having major physical or psychiatric ailments or being on medication affecting their sleep were excluded

• These involved those history of epilepsy, seizures, or dementia, current alcohol or substance abuse/dependence (must have >90 days of sobriety), night shift workers, as well as those unable to complete the study questionnaires and psychological tests.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Disease
• Parasomnias
• Sleep Disorder
• Sleep Disorder; Insomnia Type
• Sleep Hygiene
• Sleep Wake Disorders

Intervention

Behavioral:
• The Sleep Hygiene Education (SHE)
Patients were randomized into two equal groups of 30 participants each. One group received a Sleep Hygiene Education (SHE) intervention
• Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT)
30 participants had a form of Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) adapted for use with insomnia (EFT-I).

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Egypt	Faculty of Nursing, Matrouh University	Mersa Matruh

Sponsors (4)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Matrouh University	Beni-Suef University, Suez Canal University, University of Bisha, Saudia Arabia

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	poor quality sleep (PSQI)	The tool consists of 19 items from which seven components covering different aspects of sleep are computed to produce one composite global score. These are sleep latency asking about how long it takes to fall asleep, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency measuring the percentage of sleep time of total bedtime, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, daytime dysfunction, in addition to overall subjective sleep quality. Each item is weighted on a 0-3 interval scale, with a higher score indicating worse quality. The global PSQI score is then calculated by totaling the seven component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores denote a healthier sleep quality. For categorical analysis, the total score in dichotomized into good sleep quality (total score <=5), and poor sleep quality (total score >5) [15].	The tool filling can be completed in 5-10 minutes
Primary	Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15)	The Geriatric Depression Scale 15-item version. It also helps in the assessment of the severity of these symptoms and in treatment follow-up. we applied the modifed 15-question shorter version as proposed by Sheikh and Yesavage 1986, and its validity was put in evidence. The tool has 15 items such as: "Are you basically satisfied with your life?", "Do you often get bored?"," Do you feel happy most of the time?", "Do you think that most people are better off than you are?". The response to each item is either Yes or No. These are scored 1 and zero respectively. The scoring was reversed for positive items so that a higher score indicates more severe depression. The scores of the items are summed-up giving a total score ranging from 0 to 15. For categorical analysis, the total score in dichotomized into: no depression (total score <=5), and depression (total score >5). The validated Arabic version of this tool was used in the present study.	The tool filling can be completed in 5-10 minutes
Primary	Satisfaction with Life (SWL) scale	The third tool was the Satisfaction with Life (SWL) scale. This tool was developed by Diener et al. [23], to assess a person's to overall subjective feeling of satisfaction with his/her life. The tool consists of five items such as "In most ways my life is close to my ideal", "If I could live my life over, I would change almost nothing." The responses are on a 7-point Likert type scale ranging from "strongly disagree' to "strongly agree." These are scored from one to seven. The scores of the items are summed-up giving a total score ranging from 5 to 35. For categorical analysis, the total score in dichotomized into: dissatisfied (total score 5-20), and satisfied (total score 21-35). Research demonstrated high tool validity and reliability [24, 25]. Arabic version of this tool was used in the present study.; The validity of this Scale according to Cronbach's alpha was 0.87	The tool filling can be completed in 5-10 minutes
Primary	Pilot study	A pilot study was conducted on six patients representing 10% of computed sample size to test the clarity of the data collection form and the feasibility of the research process. Needed modifications were carried out based on the results of the pilot study, and the tool was finalized accordingly. The patients involved in the pilot were excluded from the study to avoid contamination of the study sample.	two months