Emervel Classic Lidocaine Versus Juvederm® Ultra in Treatment of Moderate to Severe Facial Wrinkles and Folds

Skin Wrinkling Clinical Trial

Official title:

A Pivotal USA Randomized, Evaluator-blinded, Active-controlled, Multi-center, Split-face Comparison Study of Emervel Classic Lidocaine Versus Juvederm® Ultra in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Facial Wrinkle Folds

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01205048
• Other study ID #: RD.06.CIP.18156
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: September 2010
• Est. completion date: January 19, 2012

Study information

• Verified date: June 2023
• Source: Galderma R&D
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of Emervel Classic Lidocaine versus Juvederm® Ultra in the treatment of moderate to severe facial wrinkles and folds.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 171
• Est. completion date: January 19, 2012
• Est. primary completion date: June 27, 2011
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• The subject is a male or female 18 years of age or older

• The subject has bilateral nasolabial folds that, in the opinion of both the Blinded Evaluating Investigator and the Unblinded Injecting Investigator, can be corrected with an injectable dermal implant

• The subject has the same Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) score of 3 or 4 (moderate or severe) for each nasolabial fold

Exclusion Criteria:

• The subject has active skin disease or inflammation on or near a nasolabial fold that, in the Principal Investigator's opinion, would interfere with the study device injections and/or study assessments.

• The subject has a history of sensitivity to hyaluronic acid

• The subject has a history of sensitivity to lidocaine or other amide type anesthetics

• The subject is, in the Principal Investigator's opinion, at undue risk based on the precautions, warnings and contraindications for local lidocaine anesthetics.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Skin Wrinkling

Intervention

Device:
• Emervel Classic Lidocaine
20 mg/mL + 0.3% lidocaine
• Juvederm® Ultra
24mg/mL

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	DermResearch	Austin	Texas
United States	Total Skin and Beauty Dermatology Center, PC	Birmingham	Alabama
United States	Steven Fagien	Boca Raton	Florida
United States	Laser & Skin Surgery Center in Indiana	Carmel	Indiana
United States	Dermatology Research Institute	Coral Gables	Florida
United States	Callender Center for Clinical Research	Glendale	Maryland
United States	Skin Care & Laser Physicians of Beverly Hills	Los Angeles	California
United States	The Center for Dermatology, Cosmetic & Laser Surgery	Mount Kisco	New York
United States	Sadick Research Group	New York	New York
United States	Oregon Medical Research PC	Portland	Oregon
United States	FacesPlus Aesthetic Facility	San Diego	California
United States	Therapeutics Research	San Diego	California

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Galderma R&D

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) at Week 24 After Final Initial Injection	WSRS is a validated 5-point reference scale with photographs that classifies facial wrinkles (nasolabial folds). WSRS represents clinically meaningful change in NLF severity from the adjacent grades where 1= absent (no visible fold; continuous skin line), 2 = mild (shallow but visible fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature; implant expected to produce a slight improvement in appearance), 3 = excellent (correction is expected from injectable implant), 4 = severe (very long and deep folds; prominent facial feature; less than 2 mm visible fold when stretched; significant improvement expected from injectable implant), 5 = extreme (extremely deep and long folds, detrimental to facial appearance; 2 to 4 millimeter (mm) visible V-shaped fold when stretched; unlikely to have satisfactory correction with injectable implant alone). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.	Baseline, Week 24 after final initial injection
Secondary	Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) at Week 3 After the Final Initial Injection	WSRS is a validated 5-point reference scale with photographs that classifies facial wrinkles (nasolabial folds). WSRS represents a clinically meaningful change in NLF severity from the adjacent grades where 1 = absent (no visible fold; continuous skin line), 2 = mild (shallow but visible fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature; implant is expected to produce a slight improvement in appearance), 3 = excellent (correction is expected from injectable implant), 4 = severe (very long and deep folds; prominent facial feature; less than 2 mm visible fold when stretched; significant improvement is expected from injectable implant), 5 = extreme (extremely deep and long folds, detrimental to facial appearance; 2 to 4 mm visible V-shaped fold when stretched; unlikely to have satisfactory correction with injectable implant alone). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.	Baseline, Week 3 after final initial injection
Secondary	Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) at Week 12 After Final Initial Injection	WSRS is a validated 5-point reference scale with photographs that classifies facial wrinkles (nasolabial folds). WSRS represents a clinically meaningful change in nasolabial fold severity from the adjacent grades where 1 = absent (no visible fold; continuous skin line), 2 = mild (shallow but visible fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature; implant is expected to produce a slight improvement in appearance), 3 = excellent (correction is expected from injectable implant), 4 = severe (very long and deep folds; prominent facial feature; less than 2 mm visible fold when stretched; significant improvement is expected from injectable implant), 5 = extreme (extremely deep and long folds, detrimental to facial appearance; 2 to 4 mm visible V-shaped fold when stretched; unlikely to have satisfactory correction with injectable implant alone). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.	Baseline, Week 12 after final initial injection
Secondary	Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Scale (WSRS) at Week 36 After Final Initial Injection	WSRS is a validated 5-point reference scale with photographs that classifies facial wrinkles (nasolabial folds). WSRS represents a clinically meaningful change in NLF severity from the adjacent grades where 1 = absent (no visible fold; continuous skin line), 2 = mild (shallow but visible fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature; implant is expected to produce a slight improvement in appearance), 3 = excellent (correction is expected from injectable implant), 4 = severe (very long and deep folds; prominent facial feature; less than 2 mm visible fold when stretched; significant improvement is expected from injectable implant), 5 = extreme (extremely deep and long folds, detrimental to facial appearance; 2 to 4 mm visible V-shaped fold when stretched; unlikely to have satisfactory correction with injectable implant alone). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.	Baseline, Week 36 after final initial injection
Secondary	Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) at Week 48 After Final Initial Injection	WSRS is a validated 5-point reference scale with photographs that classifies facial wrinkles (nasolabial folds). WSRS represents a clinically meaningful change in NLF severity from the adjacent grades where 1 = absent (no visible fold; continuous skin line), 2 = mild (shallow but visible fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature; implant is expected to produce a slight improvement in appearance), 3 = excellent (correction is expected from injectable implant), 4 = severe (very long and deep folds; prominent facial feature; less than 2 mm visible fold when stretched; significant improvement is expected from injectable implant), 5 = extreme (extremely deep and long folds, detrimental to facial appearance; 2 to 4 mm visible V-shaped fold when stretched; unlikely to have satisfactory correction with injectable implant alone). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.	Baseline, Week 48 after final initial injection
Secondary	Mean Change From Baseline in Participant Self-Assessment of Wrinkle Severity at Week 24 After Final Initial Injection	Participants self-assessment was measured by using a wrinkle severity scale with 1 being absent and 5 being extreme. Each participant was to perform an assessment of the wrinkle severity based on self-assessment score: 1= Absent (No visible fold; continuous skin line), 2= Mild (Shallow but visible fold with a slight indentation), 3= Moderate (Moderately deep folds), 4= Severe (Very long and deep fold), 5= Extreme (Extremely deep and long folds). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.	Baseline, Week 24 after final initial injection
Secondary	Participant Pain Assessment After the Initial Injection	Participant pain severity for each NLF was assessed at time 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 minutes and 24 hours after the initial injection using an 11-point Numeric Pain Intensity Scale (NPIS).The NPIS was a pain screening tool, commonly used to assess pain severity at that moment in time using a 0-10 scale, with 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst possible pain.	At 0 ,15, 30, 45, 60 minutes and 24 hours after the initial injection
Secondary	Participant Pain Assessment After the Initial Touch-up Injection	Participant pain severity for each NLF was assessed at time 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 minutes and 24 hours after the initial injection using an 11-point Numeric Pain Intensity Scale (NPIS).The NPIS was a pain screening tool, commonly used to assess pain severity at that moment in time using a 0-10 scale, with 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst possible pain.	At 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 minutes and 24 hours after the Initial Touch-up Injection
Secondary	Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)	AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study drug. Number of participants with AEs were reported. Event was unrelated to study product or injection procedure. If the treated side where an AE occurred was not applicable, this AE was summarized under each treatment group."	From start of study drug administration up to 56 weeks