Skin Neoplasm Clinical Trial
Official title:
DOES PLANNED VISUAL EDUCATION AFFECT UNIVERSITY STUDENTS' ATTITUDES AND BELIEFS ABOUT SKIN CANCER?
Verified date | June 2023 |
Source | Celal Bayar University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of planned visual education based on the Health Belief Model on university students' attitudes and beliefs toward skin cancer. The planned visual education based in Health Belief Model has possitive effects on univestiy students' attitudes and beliefs toward skin cancer.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 116 |
Est. completion date | September 30, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | September 20, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 24 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - who Registered and continuing department courses - who agreed to participate in the study - who had formal education - who been second year students Exclusion Criteria: - Registration and absence of the student in the department courses - Refusal to participate in the study |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Turkey | CelalBayarU | Manisa |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Celal Bayar University |
Turkey,
Armstrong AW, Idriss NZ, Kim RH. Effects of video-based, online education on behavioral and knowledge outcomes in sunscreen use: a randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2011 May;83(2):273-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.033. Epub 2010 Jun 1. — View Citation
Balyaci OE, Kostu N, Temel AB. Training program to raise consciousness among adolescents for protection against skin cancer through performance of skin self examination. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(10):5011-7. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.10.5011. — View Citation
Barbaric J, Sekerija M, Agius D, Coza D, Dimitrova N, Demetriou A, Safaei Diba C, Eser S, Gavric Z, Primic-Zakelj M, Zivkovic S, Zvolsky M, Bray F, Coebergh JW, Znaor A. Disparities in melanoma incidence and mortality in South-Eastern Europe: Increasing i — View Citation
Birch-Johansen F, Jensen A, Mortensen L, Olesen AB, Kjaer SK. Trends in the incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer in Denmark 1978-2007: Rapid incidence increase among young Danish women. Int J Cancer. 2010 Nov 1;127(9):2190-8. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25411. — View Citation
Celik S, Ilce A, Andsoy II. Knowledge and Protective Behaviors About Skin Cancer Among Nursing Students in the West Black Sea Region of Turkey. J Cancer Educ. 2018 Aug;33(4):885-892. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1188-5. — View Citation
Glanz K, Steffen AD, Schoenfeld E, Tappe KA. Randomized trial of tailored skin cancer prevention for children: the Project SCAPE family study. J Health Commun. 2013;18(11):1368-83. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.778361. Epub 2013 Jun 27. — View Citation
Haney MO, Bahar Z, Beser A, Arkan G, Cengiz B. Psychometric Testing of the Turkish Version of the Skin Cancer and Sun Knowledge Scale in Nursing Students. J Cancer Educ. 2018 Feb;33(1):21-28. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1041-2. — View Citation
Karagas MR, Zens MS, Li Z, Stukel TA, Perry AE, Gilbert-Diamond D, Sayarath V, Stephenson RS, Barton D, Nelson HH, Spencer SK. Early-onset basal cell carcinoma and indoor tanning: a population-based study. Pediatrics. 2014 Jul;134(1):e4-12. doi: 10.1542/p — View Citation
Khani Jeihooni A, Hidarnia A, Kaveh MH, Hajizadeh E. The effect of a prevention program based on health belief model on osteoporosis. J Res Health Sci. 2015 Winter;15(1):47-53. — View Citation
Kissal A, Kartal B. Effects of Health Belief Model-Based Education on Health Beliefs and Breast Self-Examination in Nursing Students. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Oct-Dec;6(4):403-410. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_17_19. — View Citation
Livingstone E, Windemuth-Kieselbach C, Eigentler TK, Rompel R, Trefzer U, Nashan D, Rotterdam S, Ugurel S, Schadendorf D. A first prospective population-based analysis investigating the actual practice of melanoma diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Eur J — View Citation
Makin JK, Warne CD, Dobbinson SJ, Wakefield MA, Hill DJ. Population and age-group trends in weekend sun protection and sunburn over two decades of the SunSmart programme in Melbourne, Australia. Br J Dermatol. 2013 Jan;168(1):154-61. doi: 10.1111/bjd.1208 — View Citation
Nahar VK, Ford MA, Hallam JS, Bass MA, Hutcheson A, Vice MA. Skin Cancer Knowledge, Beliefs, Self-Efficacy, and Preventative Behaviors among North Mississippi Landscapers. Dermatol Res Pract. 2013;2013:496913. doi: 10.1155/2013/496913. Epub 2013 Oct 7. — View Citation
Stanton WR, Chakma B, O'Riordan DL, Eyeson-Annan M. Sun exposure and primary prevention of skin cancer for infants and young children during autumn/winter. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2000 Apr;24(2):178-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2000.tb00139.x. — View Citation
Trinh N, Novice K, Lekakh O, Means A, Tung R. Use of a brief educational video administered by a portable video device to improve skin cancer knowledge in the outpatient transplant population. Dermatol Surg. 2014 Nov;40(11):1233-9. doi: 10.1097/DSS.000000 — View Citation
Tuong W, Armstrong AW. Effect of appearance-based education compared with health-based education on sunscreen use and knowledge: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Apr;70(4):665-669. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.12.007. Epub 2014 Feb 5. — View Citation
Wesson KM, Silverberg NB. Sun protection education in the United States: what we know and what needs to be taught. Cutis. 2003 Jan;71(1):71-4, 77. — View Citation
* Note: There are 17 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | The Health Belief Model Scale in Skin Cancer | Developed by Dogan and Caydam (2021), the scale consists of 26 items and 5 sub-dimensions (perceived susceptibility, perceived benefit, perceived severity, perceived barriers, and self-efficacy). The HBMSSC is a five-point Likert-type scale, and each item is answered from "disagree=1" to "strongly agree=5". The total Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale is 0.86, and for the sub-dimensions it is 0.89; 0.79; 0.77; 0.65 and 0.86, respectively. The "perceived barriers" sub-dimension of the scale is reverse coded. The scale does not have a total score, and each sub-dimension is scored within itself. Higher "perceived susceptibility, "perceived benefit, "perceived severity", and "self-efficacy" scores indicate higher perceived susceptibility, perceived benefit, perceived severity, and self-efficacy | One months | |
Primary | The Health Belief Model Scale in Skin Cancer | Developed by Dogan and Caydam (2021), the scale consists of 26 items and 5 sub-dimensions (perceived susceptibility, perceived benefit, perceived severity, perceived barriers, and self-efficacy). The HBMSSC is a five-point Likert-type scale, and each item is answered from "disagree=1" to "strongly agree=5". The total Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale is 0.86, and for the sub-dimensions it is 0.89; 0.79; 0.77; 0.65 and 0.86, respectively. The "perceived barriers" sub-dimension of the scale is reverse coded. The scale does not have a total score, and each sub-dimension is scored within itself. Higher "perceived susceptibility, "perceived benefit, "perceived severity", and "self-efficacy" scores indicate higher perceived susceptibility, perceived benefit, perceived severity, and self-efficacy | Three months | |
Primary | The Health Belief Model Scale in Skin Cancer | Developed by Dogan and Caydam (2021), the scale consists of 26 items and 5 sub-dimensions (perceived susceptibility, perceived benefit, perceived severity, perceived barriers, and self-efficacy). The HBMSSC is a five-point Likert-type scale, and each item is answered from "disagree=1" to "strongly agree=5". The total Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale is 0.86, and for the sub-dimensions it is 0.89; 0.79; 0.77; 0.65 and 0.86, respectively. The "perceived barriers" sub-dimension of the scale is reverse coded. The scale does not have a total score, and each sub-dimension is scored within itself. Higher "perceived susceptibility, "perceived benefit, "perceived severity", and "self-efficacy" scores indicate higher perceived susceptibility, perceived benefit, perceived severity, and self-efficacy | Seven months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02550678 -
A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of ASN-002 in Adult Patients With Low-risk Nodular Basal Cell Carcinoma
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03666325 -
Immunotherapy +/- EGFR Inhibitor In Advanced/Metastatic cSCC: Tackling Primary And Secondary Resistance
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT02602067 -
131Iodine-Tenatumomab Treatment in Tenascin-C Positive Cancer Patients
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05786716 -
DETERMINE Trial Treatment Arm 04: Trastuzumab in Combination With Pertuzumab in Adult, Teenage/Young Adult and Paediatric Patients With Cancers With HER2 Amplification or Activating Mutations
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05908435 -
Impact of Sunscreen Dispensers in Parks Visited by Teenagers
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02580916 -
Utility of the Skin Cancer Quality of Life Impact Tool
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01167998 -
Early Diagnosis of Malignant Transformation of Pigmentary Skin Lesions
|
||
Completed |
NCT04176237 -
School-based Randomized Trial of SunSmart Interventions
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03321903 -
EPR Tumor Oximetry With CE India Ink
|
||
Completed |
NCT05068687 -
Peroperative Assessment of Malignancies of the Head and Neck Using High-resolution 18F-FDG-PET/CT
|
N/A |