Skin Laxity Clinical Trial
Official title:
Histological Evaluation of Human Skin Biopsies to Assess the Effects of Renuvion APR Treatment as an Adjunct Procedure in Facelift Surgery
Verified date | June 2024 |
Source | Apyx Medical |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The goal of this prospective, single-arm clinical study is to gather quantifiable data on Renuvion's impact on skin elasticity and hydration, indicators of skin quality and estimate the biological skin age using DNA methylation in males and females between 18 and 75 years of age who plan to receive a lower facelift surgery. The main purpose is to quantify the effect of the Renuvion device on skin elasticity (collagen density, elastin, fibrillin-1), hydration (aquaporin-3, acidic glycosaminoglycans, HA), and DNA methylation to estimate the biological age of the skin. Participants will receive a lower facelift surgery per the Investigator's standard clinical practice and treatment with the Renuvion APR System.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 10 |
Est. completion date | December 31, 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | November 30, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 75 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Male or female subjects, ages 18 - 75 years old. - ASA Physical Status Classification System Class I and Class II subjects. - Planning to undergo a lower facelift procedure, with or without a neck lift, at the investigator's site. - Understands and accepts the obligation not to undergo any other procedures or treatments in the areas to be treated during study participation. - Absence of physical conditions unacceptable to the investigator. - Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active must be willing to use an approved method of birth control during study participation. - Willing and able to comply with protocol requirements, including study-required images/photos, assessments/measurements, and returning for follow-up visits. - Willing to release rights for the use of study photos, including in publication. - Able to read, understand, sign, and date the informed consent. - Able to communicate with the site via video and/or photographs, in the event of a virtual follow-up visit. Exclusion Criteria: - Subjects presenting with ASA Physical Status Classification System Classes III or higher. - Pregnant, lactating, or plans to become pregnant during study participation. - Known hypersensitivity or allergy to tumescent anesthetic (lidocaine/ epinephrine). - Known hypersensitivity or allergy to ibuprofen or other NSAIDS. - Active systemic or local skin disease that may alter wound healing. - Significant or uncontrolled medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator participation in the study may compromise the patient's health. - History of autoimmune disease (excluding Hashimoto's thyroiditis). - Known susceptibility to keloid formation or hypertrophic scarring. - Cancerous or pre-cancerous lesions in the area to be treated. - Possesses a surgically implanted electronic device (i.e. pacemaker). - Serious mental health illness such as dementia or schizophrenia; psychiatric hospitalization in the past two years. - Participation in any other investigational study within 30 days prior to consent and throughout study participation. - Subject who, in the opinion of the investigator, is not an appropriate candidate for the study. - Subject who has had a prior facelift, neck lift, or Renuvion treatment in the face/neck area |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | LA Plastic Surgery and Dermatology | Bradenton | Florida |
United States | Holcomb & Kreithen Plastic Surgery and MedSpa | Sarasota | Florida |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Apyx Medical |
United States,
Alster TS, Doshi SN, Hopping SB. Combination surgical lifting with ablative laser skin resurfacing of facial skin: a retrospective analysis. Dermatol Surg. 2004 Sep;30(9):1191-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30370.x. — View Citation
Boeni R. Safety of tumescent liposuction under local anesthesia in a series of 4,380 patients. Dermatology. 2011;222(3):278-81. doi: 10.1159/000327375. Epub 2011 May 24. — View Citation
Boroni M, Zonari A, Reis de Oliveira C, Alkatib K, Ochoa Cruz EA, Brace LE, Lott de Carvalho J. Highly accurate skin-specific methylome analysis algorithm as a platform to screen and validate therapeutics for healthy aging. Clin Epigenetics. 2020 Jul 13;12(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13148-020-00899-1. — View Citation
Doshi SN, Alster TS. Combination radiofrequency and diode laser for treatment of facial rhytides and skin laxity. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2005 Mar;7(1):11-5. doi: 10.1080/14764170410003075. — View Citation
Fatemi A, Weiss MA, Weiss RA. Short-term histologic effects of nonablative resurfacing: results with a dynamically cooled millisecond-domain 1320 nm Nd:YAG laser. Dermatol Surg. 2002 Feb;28(2):172-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.01112.x. — View Citation
Fuchshuber P, Schwaitzberg S, Jones D, Jones SB, Feldman L, Munro M, Robinson T, Purcell-Jackson G, Mikami D, Madani A, Brunt M, Dunkin B, Gugliemi C, Groah L, Lim R, Mischna J, Voyles CR. The SAGES Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy program (FUSE): history, development, and purpose. Surg Endosc. 2018 Jun;32(6):2583-2602. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5933-y. Epub 2017 Dec 7. — View Citation
Gardner ES, Reinisch L, Stricklin GP, Ellis DL. In vitro changes in non-facial human skin following CO2 laser resurfacing: a comparison study. Lasers Surg Med. 1996;19(4):379-87. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1996)19:43.0.CO;2-P. — View Citation
Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS, Halpern EF, Rittman WJ, Mueller PR, Rosenthal DI. Radiofrequency tissue ablation: importance of local temperature along the electrode tip exposure in determining lesion shape and size. Acad Radiol. 1996 Mar;3(3):212-8. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(96)80443-0. — View Citation
Hsu TS, Kaminer MS. The use of nonablative radiofrequency technology to tighten the lower face and neck. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2003 Jun;22(2):115-23. doi: 10.1053/sder.2003.50011. — View Citation
Hurwitz D, Smith D. Treatment of overweight patients by radiofrequency-assisted liposuction (RFAL) for aesthetic reshaping and skin tightening. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012 Feb;36(1):62-71. doi: 10.1007/s00266-011-9783-z. Epub 2011 Jul 13. — View Citation
Irvine Duncan D. Nonexcisional tissue tightening: creating skin surface area reduction during abdominal liposuction by adding radiofrequency heating. Aesthet Surg J. 2013 Nov 1;33(8):1154-66. doi: 10.1177/1090820X13505862. — View Citation
Mayoral FA. Skin tightening with a combined unipolar and bipolar radiofrequency device. J Drugs Dermatol. 2007 Feb;6(2):212-5. — View Citation
Nakab L, Hee CK, Guetta O. Improvements in Skin Quality Biological Markers in Skin Explants Using Hyaluronic Acid Filler VYC-12L. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Mar 27;8(3):e2723. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002723. eCollection 2020 Mar. — View Citation
Narins RS, Brandt F, Leyden J, Lorenc ZP, Rubin M, Smith S. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Restylane versus Zyplast for the correction of nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg. 2003 Jun;29(6):588-95. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29150.x. — View Citation
Paul M, Blugerman G, Kreindel M, Mulholland RS. Three-dimensional radiofrequency tissue tightening: a proposed mechanism and applications for body contouring. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011 Feb;35(1):87-95. doi: 10.1007/s00266-010-9564-0. Epub 2010 Sep 11. — View Citation
Ross EV, McKinlay JR, Anderson RR. Why does carbon dioxide resurfacing work? A review. Arch Dermatol. 1999 Apr;135(4):444-54. doi: 10.1001/archderm.135.4.444. — View Citation
Thomsen S. Pathologic analysis of photothermal and photomechanical effects of laser-tissue interactions. Photochem Photobiol. 1991 Jun;53(6):825-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1991.tb09897.x. — View Citation
van Dongen JA, Langeveld M, van de Lande LS, Harmsen MC, Stevens HP, van der Lei B. The Effects of Facial Lipografting on Skin Quality: A Systematic Review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Nov;144(5):784e-797e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006147. — View Citation
Zelickson BD, Kist D, Bernstein E, Brown DB, Ksenzenko S, Burns J, Kilmer S, Mehregan D, Pope K. Histological and ultrastructural evaluation of the effects of a radiofrequency-based nonablative dermal remodeling device: a pilot study. Arch Dermatol. 2004 Feb;140(2):204-9. doi: 10.1001/archderm.140.2.204. — View Citation
* Note: There are 19 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Analysis of Elasticity (collagen density, elastin, & fibrillin-1) | To assess Elasticity (collagen density, elastin, & fibrillin-1) evaluation will be based on the qualitative microscopic observation of the stained sections comparing baseline samples to follow-up samples. Histology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) part of the study will be assessed semi-quantitatively. Thus, there will not be units of measurement e.g., weight and height for these evaluations.
Semi-quantitative scoring for any microscopic changes (H&E staining) and enhancing collagen production (e.g., trichrome staining). Four-point Severity Scale Semi-Quantitative Grading of Changes in Histology Samples Description - Definition Normal - Tissue is considered to be normal Minimal - The amount of change present barely exceeds normal limits. Mild (Slight) - The amount of change is easily identified but limited severity. Moderate - The amount of change is prominent, but significant potential for increased severity. Severe - The degree of change is as complete as possible |
Baseline, Day 180 | |
Primary | Analysis of Hydration (aquaporin-3, acidic glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), hyaluronic acid (HA)) | To assess Hydration (aquaporin-3, GAGs, HA), evaluation will be based on the qualitative microscopic observation of the stained sections comparing baseline samples to follow-up samples. Histology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) part of the study will be assessed semi-quantitatively. Thus, there will not be units of measurement e.g., weight and height for these kinds of evaluations.
Semi-quantitative scoring for any microscopic changes (H&E staining) and enhancing collagen production (e.g., trichrome staining). Four-point Severity Scale Semi-Quantitative Grading of Changes in Histology Samples Description - Definition Normal - Tissue is considered to be normal Minimal - The amount of change present barely exceeds normal limits. Mild (Slight) - The amount of change is easily identified but limited severity. Moderate - The amount of change is prominent, but significant potential for increased severity. Severe - The degree of change is as complete as possible |
Baseline, Day 180 | |
Primary | Analysis of Adverse Events | Analysis of adverse events through the 180-day post-treatment visit. | Treatment, Day 1, 7, 14, 45, 90, 180 | |
Primary | Analyzing days of duration for Bruising, Swelling | Analysis days of duration of bruising and swelling post-treatment through the 180-day visit. | Post-Treatment, Day 1, 7, 14, 45, 90, 180 | |
Primary | Days to healed percentage | Analysis average number of days to healed profile post-procedure through the 180-day post-treatment visit through Case Report Forms through percentage healed at each follow-up. | Post-Treatment, Day 1, 7, 14, 45, 90, 180 | |
Primary | Bleeding | Analysis of bleeding during surgery measured in cubic centimeter. | During Procedure (Day 0) | |
Primary | The Principal Investigator will complete a PGAIS assessing overall aesthetic improvement in the treatment area at day 45, 90, and 180 post-treatment. | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale Evaluation (PGAIS) rating by investigator [Very much improved, Much improved, Improved, No change, Worse, Much Worse, Very much Worse] | Day 45, 90 and180 | |
Primary | The subject will complete a SGAIS assessing overall aesthetic improvement in the treatment area at day 45, 90, and 180 post-treatment. | Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale Evaluation (SGAIS) rating by subject [Very much improved, Much improved, Improved, No change, Worse, Much Worse, Very much Worse] | Day 45, 90 and180 | |
Primary | Patient Satisfaction | The subject will complete a Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) while referring to their image in a mirror and current post-treatment photos compared to baseline photos to rate how satisfied they are, and if they note any improvement in the treatment area. | Day 180 | |
Primary | Estimated biological age by DNA methylation. | DNA methylation (DNAm) will be used to measure the tissue samples to estimate the biological age of the skin. A highly accurate skin-specific age algorithm will analyze these modifications related to human skin health and molecular aging - quantifying the skin health/skin age of the tissue beyond the chronological age of the subject. Hallmarks of aging include genomic instability, telomere attrition, epigenetic alterations, loss of proteostasis, deregulated nutrient sensing, mitochondrial dysfunction, cellular senescence, stem cell exhaustion, and altered intercellular communication. | Baseline, Day 180 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06140628 -
A 28-day Clinical Study on Facial Skin Rejuvenation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01971736 -
Efficacy of Long Pulsed 1064nm Laser for Facial Skin Tightening
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01713985 -
Feasibility Study: Evaluation of Ulthera Versus Thermage for Treating the Face and Neck
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01708252 -
Feasibility Study: Treatment of Post-surgery and Surgery Naive Patients Who Failed to Respond to a Previous Ulthera Treatment
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01713998 -
Treatment of the Face and Neck With Lower Ulthera System Energy Settings
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01708382 -
Feasibility Study: Lifting and Tightening of the Elbows
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04296201 -
Evaluation of the Immediate Effect and Safety of DMA™ Novel Muscle Stimulation Technology
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06000839 -
A Safety and Effectiveness Study of CELLBOOSTER® Lift (Stabilized Booster Complex Using CHAC Technology)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06366503 -
Evaluating Procedure Pairing of a Post-Procedure Cream Versus a Comparator in Patients Treated With Fractional Ablative CO2 Laser for Facial Rejuvenation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05929625 -
Radiofrequency and Ultrasound for Improvement of Skin Laxity and Wrinkles: Efficacy and Safety Evaluation
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01713569 -
Feasibility Study: Histological Characterization After Treatment With the Ulthera® System
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01519934 -
A Retrospective Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Ulthera System
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05605691 -
Post-Market Lower Eyelid Treatment With Renuvion in Greece
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04477187 -
Clinical Assessment of Skin Tightening and Contour Change of Submental Tissue Using Bipolar Radiofrequency Microneedling
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05590364 -
Aesthetic Performance and Tolerance of an Injective Intradermal Treatment for the Skin Roughness and Laxity of Back of the Hands
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04146584 -
Safety and Efficacy of SofWave Treatment to Lift Lax Tissue in the Submental and Neck Zones and to Lift the Eyebrow
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05750901 -
Evaluation of Fractional Ablative Laser Treatment for Skin Conditions
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04721600 -
Evaluation of the Evoke Radiofrequency Device for Improvement of Skin Appearance
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06157567 -
Clinical Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance of the Profound Matrix System
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05847530 -
Pilot Evaluation of the Cynosure Potenza™ System for Treatment of Cosmetic Dermatologic Skin Conditions
|
N/A |