Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The study is designed as a multi-center, international, prospective, parallel, randomized, single blinded trial comparing the time to first primary endpoint event (Sustained Paroxysmal AF/Persistent AF or stroke/TIA) occurrence in a follow up period of 3 years, between Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS) ON versus OFF, on top of a DDD pacing in patients with pacemaker or ICD indication who require dual-chamber pacing due to sinus node disease (SND), with or without atrioventricular (AV) block.


Clinical Trial Description

The benefits of rate-responsiveness on top of dual-chamber pacing still need to be definitively assessed in Sinus Node Dysfunction (SND). Although many rate responsive (RR) sensors have been developed, no large clinical trials evaluated their benefits in terms of clinical endpoints such as clinically relevant atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke. Electromechanical sensors (piezoelectric accelerometers) have been widely used for their simplicity and overall reliability. However there is some evidence indicating the Closed Loop Stimulation as one of the more efficient and physiological sensors. Two randomized clinical studies have been conducted so far, showing that in the Brady-Tachy Syndrome the CLS algorithm was associated with a significantly lower overall atrial arrhythmia burden as compared both with a DDDR mode based on a standard accelerometric sensor and an atrial overdrive approach. Both studies yielded consistent results, albeit with a parallel and intraindividual comparison designs, respectively. The atrial arrhythmic burden is an important but surrogate endpoint, not necessarily related to long-term clinical outcome. The CLS effects on AF (if any) should be investigated in terms of time to first new onset of clinically relevant AF. In the light of these considerations, it appears interesting to run a large randomized study coherently collecting data on the overall clinical benefit of CLS, primarily in terms of AF and stroke, in a population indicated for pacemaker or ICD and needing dual-chamber pacing due to SND. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT02579889
Study type Interventional
Source Biotronik SE & Co. KG
Contact
Status Terminated
Phase N/A
Start date September 2015
Completion date December 2023

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT01441583 - Ingenio Device Algorithm Study N/A
Completed NCT02034526 - Reducing Atrial Pacing Rate to Reduce Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Sick Sinus Syndrome. N/A
Completed NCT02485093 - To Pace or Not to Pace in Sinus Node Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT05367037 - Physiological Ventricular Pacing Vs Managed Ventricular Pacing for Persistent AF Prevention in Prolonged AV Interval N/A
Completed NCT02400983 - Real Life Automatic Atrial Capture Device Control N/A
Completed NCT00832260 - IES-ACap: Influence of Atrial Pulse Width in the Behaviour of ACap™ Confirm Algorithm.
Completed NCT00382525 - PANORAMA Observational Study N/A