View clinical trials related to Shoulder Injuries.
Filter by:The primary purpose of this research is to compare the images obtained by ultrasound between a standard repair of the subscapularis tissue and after repair with a Biobrace. The secondary purpose is to determine if there are any clinical differences.
The purpose of this study is to assess cartilage strain and contact areas following glenohumeral instability compared to healthy individuals.
Problems related to the shoulder are frequently seen in the society. Many methods are used to evaluate these problems. One of the most frequently used methods is self-report scales. When the shoulder-oriented self-report scales in the literature are examined, methods such as Visual Analog Scale, Numeric Scale and Likert Scale are used more frequently. In the literature, there is no scale that seeks clear answers as yes/no by grading shoulder-oriented activities. We would like to contribute to the literature by developing a scale that uses such a scaling method. All of the shoulder-oriented self-report scales used in Turkey were developed by cultural adaptation. In our study, it was aimed to develop an easy-to-understand scale that includes items with high social intelligibility and offers a new scaling method.
The subscapularis is part of the rotator cuff and is release as part of a reverse shoulder replacement. The decision to repair this tendon is controversial. This research is being done to help determine if rotator cuff repair improves or hinders shoulder replacement. A worrisome but rare complication after shoulder replacement is dislocation. Rotator cuff repair may help reduce this risk. The repair may hinder some of the range of motion afterwards or could help with internal rotation strength. There is a chance that the repair doesn't matter at all. The goal of this study is to delineate outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty with the respect to management of the subscapularis tendon. Further information about rotator cuff repair after reverse shoulder replacement can help define complications, potentially decrease OR time, and improve functional outcomes. A total of 148 patients will be enrolled and the duration of the study will be 5 years. All patients will be required to follow-up at 2¬-week, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year post-operative marks. Any time information is collected for a study there is a small risk of breach of confidentiality. There are no monetary costs or payments associated with this study. You may or may not benefit by taking part in this study. There is no guarantee that you will receive direct benefit from your participation in this study. To be clear, participation in this study is completely voluntary.
The aim of this study is to assess whether the indicators outcome of these tests discriminate between different populations. In particular to compare populations with shoulders without any history of injury with a population that had undergone a reduction in glenohumeral instability by the Latarjet technique.
The glenohumeral joint is an articulation between the glenoid of the scapula and the head of the humerus that is enclosed by a synovial capsule divided into three main components: anterior, posterior, and the axillary pouch. Symptoms of posterior capsule tightness are linked to altered shoulder biomechanics and impairments which includes glenohumeral internal rotation deficit, incomplete glenohumeral adduction, impaired inferior glenohumeral ligament (IGHL) function, and increased risk of impingement symptoms. In the literature the two techniques available for stretching posterior capsule are pragmatic posterior capsular stretch and sleeper stretch. Pragmatic posterior capsular stretch is therapist administered and sleeper stretch is patient-administered. The work on the pragmatic posterior capsular stretch is more specified and rational to mark the tightness in the posterior capsule.
The objectives of this study are to confirm the safety, performance, and clinical benefits of Zimmer Biomet Shoulder Arthroplasty Systems and its instrumentation in primary or revision shoulder arthroplasty. These objectives will be assessed using standard scoring systems, radiographic evidence, and adverse event records. Safety of the system will be assessed by monitoring the frequency an incidence of adverse events.
The aim of this study is to identify factors responsible for recurrent shoulder instability in children. Shoulder instability, i.e. complete or partial dislocation of the shoulder joint, is common in children, resulting in pain and disability. Recurrent instability can damage the shoulder joint resulting in the premature development of arthritis. Rehabilitation approaches are preferred over surgical methods for the growing child e.g. physiotherapy to restore movement and prevent further instability. Existing rehabilitation procedures are based on addressing factors assumed to be responsible for instability e.g. physiotherapists may try to increase shoulder stability by building up the shoulder muscles to compensate for the damaged ligaments. It is evident however that the mechanisms of shoulder instability are not well understood, as failure rates for physiotherapy are high, with 70% - 90% of children continuing to suffer recurrent instability. This is an observational, cross-sectional study of children (aged 8 to 18) presenting with shoulder instability of any origin, traumatic or atraumatic (n=15) and an age-matched sample (n=15) with no history of shoulder problems. Muscle activity and movement pattern differences will be measured using non-invasive 3D motion capture and surface electromyography, to identify factors responsible for instability. Only a single visit to the site will be required (The Orthotic Research & Locomotor Assessment Unit (ORLAU) based at The Robert Jones & Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust in Oswestry.). If investigators better understand the mechanisms associated with instability, physiotherapy interventions to reduce dislocations and disability can be better targeted. If specific patterns of activity associated with instability are identified, these could be addressed through personalised and improved exercise prescription and rehabilitation. Additionally, causes of instability for which physiotherapy may not be appropriate may be identified, therefore ensuring patients are referred to the correct service in a timely manner, improving patient outcomes and allocating physiotherapy resources more appropriately. Participants will be recruited from musculoskeletal/orthopaedic outpatient clinics. This study is funded by the Private Physiotherapy Education Foundation.
This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis in patients receiving interscalene brachial plexus nerve block with prolonged neural blockade. English speaking American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1-3 patients ages 18-80 receiving prolonged interscalene nerve block will be randomized into 3 groups: first group receiving a perineural catheter infusing 0.2% ropivacaine; the second group receiving a single shot injection of 10mL liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel; n=20) plus 5 mL 0.5% bupivacaine and the third receiving 20mL liposomal bupivacaine plus 5mL bupivacaine (to be determined by the attending anesthesiologist).Primary outcome will be incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis postoperative day 1 as measured by point of care (POCUS) ultrasound.
Shoulder pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal complaints in orthopedic practice. Rotator cuff injuries account for up to 70% of pain in the shoulder girdle. There is no clinical study carried out in Brazil comparing cost effectiveness between the open and arthroscopic methods of rotator cuff repair surgery. The present study aims to determine which method of repair of the rotator cuff, open or arthroscopic, has the best cost effectiveness ratio. A randomized clinical trial will be carried out in which patients with symptomatic rotator cuff lesion will be submitted to repair surgery by either open or arthroscopic technique and will be subsequently evaluated.