Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

There exists continued controversy over the use of propofol in Emergency Department procedural sedation, this is despite its widespread existence in clinical practice for at least a decade. These concerns are not limited to the ED setting and are primarily related to the pharmacological properties of the drug itself and its potential for harm. The bolus administration of propofol, aimed at a target of sedation, offers several advantages over more traditional agents, yet these advantages are also its limitations. The use of a target-controlled infusion may provide the sedationist with greater control over the pharmacokinetics of propofol and thus reduce the rate of adverse incidents.

This feasibility study aims to use a pragmatic design to test the safety and efficacy of propofol TCI whilst assessing the practicalities of it's use in the ED. If it proves to be feasible then the researchers plan to proceed to a multi centre pilot study to gather information to adequately power a larger randomised multi centre trial.


Clinical Trial Description

Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) has long been a core skill of the Emergency Physician, although over the last decade, developments in patient monitoring and the use of newer sedative and analgesic agents have served to improve both safety and efficacy. Despite these advances and their consolidation into well-designed guidelines concern regarding the safety of ED PSA persists.

More specifically, concerns have been raised regarding the use of propofol, an ultra-short acting anaesthetic agent. The practice of using sub-anaesthetic doses of propofol to achieve sedation in ED PSA originated around the turn of the millennium and has since become the most common choice of sedative in the ED. Propofol offers a number of advantages as a sedative agent, including; a short onset and recovery time, amnesiac properties and good efficacy. The cost of these properties is in part, a narrow therapeutic range.

When given as a bolus, propofol will induce a spectrum of states up to and including general anaesthesia, dependent on the dosage. The correlation between dose and effect varies based on several patient factors. Whilst targeting a state of sedation it is possible for the operator to 'overshoot' moving rapidly from Conscious Sedation to Deep Sedation to General Anaesthesia. The inadvertent induction of general anesthesia may result in unanticipated complication.

The principle complications associated with accidental over-sedation or general anesthesia relate to the patency of the patient's airway. The reported frequency of airway complications during ED PSA with propofol range from 5.0% to 9.4%7, this includes a rate of supplemental ventilation of between 3.0% and 9.4%, with oxygen desaturation occurring in between 5% and 7% of cases12. In addition, the bolus administration of propofol may result in transient hypotension. Despite being a relatively short lived effect, this may be pronounced in those with intravascular volume depletion or in the elderly, and in some may be profound, with one series demonstrating that 3.5% of those undergoing PSA with propofol experience ≥ 20% falls in blood pressure. At first inspection the reported rate of complication may appear low, and has by some been interpreted as evidence of the relative safety of ED PSA, however alternative views have been expressed in the context of much lower rates of adverse events seen in elective painful procedures requiring conscious sedation. This is compounded by the non-standard way in which adverse events have been reported across studies.

A potential solution to the adverse events experienced with the bolus administration of propofol is the use of a target-controlled infusion (TCI). This method is widely used in anaesthetic practice and whilst the PK remains the same irrespective of if you give a bolus or infusion of propofol, TCI allows the titration in perhaps a more controlled manner.

The aim when administering propofol, as with any drug, is to induce a desired clinical effect, in this context a level of sedation. As previously alluded to, when administering propofol in a bolus fashion or as a fixed rate infusion, without regard to those factors which cause biologic variability (e.g. age, gender, weight), it is difficult to accurately and consistently predict clinical effect. The development, in the early 1990's, of computer assisted infusion devices, for the first time, allowed the clinician to target a plasma concentration, with the pump automatically altering the rate of infusion based on a pre-programmed pharmacokinetic model. These target-controlled infusion (TCI) devices have undergone significant development and are now in widespread clinical use. Their operation uses a mathematical mode that reflects a theoretical 'three-compartment' model that may comprise the central compartment (plasma), and two peripheral compartments (highly perfused tissue e.g. brain and poorly perfused tissue e.g. adipose). In a state of equilibrium, propofol will diffuse between compartments at a constant rate. These rate constants have been used in pharmacokinetic models to mathematically predict the plasma concentration and latterly the effect site concentration, in this case that in the brain.

In practical terms, TCI allows the operator to more accurately target a specific clinical effect. When propofol is administered as a bolus, the operator is likely to either under-dose, delivering an insufficient effect site concentration, or over-dose, exceeding the desired effect site concentration. TCI allows the operator to titrate to effect and then to maintain a steady state, potentially eliminating the risk of 'over shooting' and reducing the rate of adverse events. TCI is not without limitation. PK models are an estimate as they have been derived from a healthy population but any inherent inaccuracy is consistent in different populations and accounted for by careful titration.

The use of propofol TCI has been studied in a number of settings, including gastrointestinal endoscopy, dental surgery, oocyte retrieval and bronchoscopy. To our knowledge propofol TCI in sedation has not been studied in an ED setting. Trials have demonstrated a good safety profile for propofol TCI, with at least one large randomised-controlled trial in an endoscopy setting, showing a reduction in both respiratory and cardiovascular adverse events in comparison to the bolus administration of propofol. Unfortunately, trials to date have suffered from a high degree of heterogeneity, leading the Cochrane review, on the subject of propofol TCI versus manually controlled infusion in both general anaesthesia and sedation, to conclude that there was insufficient evidence to make firm recommendations regarding its use in clinical practice. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03442803
Study type Interventional
Source NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
Contact Fiona M Burton, MBChB, FRCEM
Phone +44 1355 584103
Email fionaburton@nhs.net
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date April 3, 2017
Completion date December 31, 2018

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT05635240 - Chronic Anterior Shoulder Instability in the Military
Recruiting NCT02913352 - Latarjet Versus Modified Eden-Hybinette for Anterior Shoulder Dislocation N/A
Completed NCT03154957 - Management of Acute Dislocation of Emergency in the University Hospital of Strasbourg Shoulder: Retrospective Evaluation of Practices and Proposal of a Clinical Path
Recruiting NCT02510625 - The Arthroscopic Treatment of Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability N/A
Completed NCT00707018 - Immobilization in External Rotation After First Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation N/A
Recruiting NCT04887337 - Early arthroscoPic Stabilization veRsus rehabilitatiOn of the Shoulder in Adolescents With a trauMatic First-time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ePisode N/A
Completed NCT04960137 - Shoulder Dislocations Treated With Button Plates and Non-absorbable Suture Anchor N/A
Recruiting NCT05388942 - Virtual Reality Hypnosis Versus Inhaled Nitrous Oxide in Anterior Shoulder Dislocation Reduction: an Open Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial N/A
Completed NCT02725333 - Does Shoulder Stabilizations Stabilize Shoulders? N/A
Recruiting NCT05705479 - Shoulder Instability Trial Comparing Arthroscopic Stabilization Benefits Compared With Latarjet Procedure Evaluation - STABLE Definitive Trial N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05048303 - Multicenter Clinical Cohort Study of Modified Flexible Fixation Latarjet Procedure for Recurrent Shoulder Dislocation N/A
Recruiting NCT03453710 - Remplissage Versus Latarjet Coracoid Transfer for Recurrent Shoulder Instability N/A
Recruiting NCT04952636 - A Prospective Comparative Study of Arthroscopic and Open Surgery in Cuistow Procedure N/A
Completed NCT00251264 - Arthroscopic Versus Open Stabilization for Traumatic Shoulder Instability N/A
Terminated NCT02426996 - The Latarjet-type Procedure Using the SEM Positioner: Using a Scan to Assess Consolidation N/A
Completed NCT04022629 - ASSET 2 Study: Long-Term Follow-up of a Randomised Control Trial Phase 2/Phase 3
Terminated NCT04820491 - Efficient Anterior Shoulder Ultrasound Reduction Multicenter Prospective Randomized Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT05443295 - Improvement of Fatigue in Unstable Shoulder Through a Therapeutic Exercise Program in Physiotherapy N/A
Completed NCT06459258 - Throwing Velocity and Patient Reported Outcomes in Elite Level Handball Players After Completion of Shoulder-Pacemaker Strength Training N/A
Completed NCT04479397 - Sling vs Nothing After Latarjet Procedure N/A