View clinical trials related to Shock, Septic.
Filter by:Menstrual staphylococcal toxic shock is a rare but severe disease, requiring intensive care in over 80% of cases. Menstrual staphylococcal toxic shock develops during the peri-menstrual period, in healthy young women colonized by a vaginal strain of Staphylococcus aureus secreting the Toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 (TSST-1) and not immune to it, in a favorable environment, i.e. wearing intravaginal menstrual protection (tampon, menstrual cup). The rarity of the syndrome, its polymorphous clinical presentation and the absence of a totally specific biological examination make menstrual staphylococcal toxic shock a difficult pathology to diagnose. The reference clinical criteria correspond to the advanced picture of multivisceral failure, making it possible to classify cases a posteriori, but contribute to diagnostic delay and lack sensitivity. Patient accounts suggest the presence of symptoms in the days preceding the development of toxic shock, and also during previous menstrual cycles. The identification of prodromal symptoms could enable earlier management of menstrual staphylococcal toxic shock by removal of intra-vaginal sanitary protection, the main risk factor, before the disease becomes permanently established and requires intensive care.
Norepinephrine is a catecholamine that is the first-line vasopressor for septic shock. The addition of non-catecholamine vasopressors, including vasopressin and angiotensin-II may be used in adults with septic shock that have inadequate mean arterial pressure while on norepinephrine. Uncertainty exists regarding the timing of initiation of these agents and there is a lack of data comparing their safety and efficacy. The current literature suggests that earlier initiation of angiotensin-II will have a more significant reduction on norepinephrine-equivalent dose compared to later initiation. In addition, approximately half of patients initiated on vasopressin do not have an early hemodynamic response 6 hours after initiation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of angiotensin-II when used as the second vasopressor agent for septic shock.
The aim of this study is to compare the effect of resuscitation guided by Left ventricular outflow tract-velocity time integral (LVOT-VTI) variation versus the effect of resuscitation guided by inferior vena cava (IVC) variation on time to normalization of the capillary refill time in adult patients with septic shock, amount of resuscitation fluids, rate of vasopressor and ICU length of stay.
This is a single-center study retrospectively evaluating a local clinical routine to administer norepinephrine in midline catheters, with regard to complications and patient outcomes
In 2016, sepsis and septic shock was redocumented as fatal organ dysfunction caused by infection-induced host response disorders (Singer et al. 2016). Infectious shock is a subtype of sepsis; its circulation abnormalities significantly increase the mortality rate. The definition was updated to facilitate rapid identification and timely treatment. Despite the continuous progress of awareness and intervention, the mortality rate of septic shock is approaching 40% or more (Gasim et al. 2016, Karampela et al. 2022). Infectious shock exists in the presence of imbalance of oxygen supply and demand as well as tissue hypoxia, early improvement of tissue hypoperfusion is key to the treatment, a specific cluster treatment program was recommended in the guidelines of sepsis rescue action (Rhodes et al. 2017). Severe sepsis remains associated with high mortality, and the early recognition of the signs of tissue hypoperfusion is crucial in its management. The effectiveness of oxygen-derived parameters as resuscitation goals has been questioned, and the latest data have failed to demonstrate clinical advantage (Rudd et al. 2020). Prompt diagnosis and appropriate treatment of sepsis are of ulmost importance and key to survival. However, routinely used biomarkers, such as C-reactive protein and procalcitonin, have shown moderate diagnostic and prognostic value. Of note, the recent consensus definition for sepsis is based on clinical criteria, implying the paucity of reliable sepsis biomarkers. The new diagnostic criteria also incorporate the use of the SOFA score, a composite prediction tool, which is derived by a combination of clinical signs and biomarkers of organ dysfunction, leaving aside classic inflammatory biomarkers (Pierrakos et al. 2020, Karampela et al. 2022). The venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) is <70% in the majority of patients with severe sepsis on admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). The central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference or only carbon dioxide gap (PCO2 gap) has gained relevance as a measure of assessment of several parameters (Mallat et al. 2015). The balance of dioxide carbon (CO2) production by the tissues and its elimination through the lungs can be reflected by the difference between the mixed venous content (CvCO2) and the arterial content (CaCO2). This venous-arterial difference in CO2 content (CCO2) can be estimated by the following equation: ΔPCO2 = PvCO2 - PaCO2, denominated PCO2 gap and in physiological conditions it ranges from 2 to 5 mmHg. In a few words, it indicates the difference between partial pressure of carbon dioxide in central venous blood (PvCO2) and arterial blood (PaCO2) (Janotka et al. 2021). The venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference (Pv-aCO2) can indicate the adequacy of microvascular blood flow in the early phases of resuscitation in sepsis (Ospina-Tascon et al. 2016, de Sá 2022). Hence, other resuscitation goals, such as PCO2 gap, have been suggested, due to their ability to predict adverse clinical outcomes and simplicity in patients achieving normal oxygen derived parameters during the early phases of resuscitation in septic shock. The PCO2 gap can be a marker of cardiac output adequacy in global metabolic conditions that are less affected by the impairment of oxygen extraction capacity (Bitar et al. 2020).
Assess the effectiveness and safety of using dynamic arterial elastance as a tool for weaning vasopressor support in patients with septic shock, compared to a control group
Sepsis is life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Septic shock is defined as sepsis that has circulatory, cellular, and metabolic abnormalities that are associated with a greater risk of mortality than sepsis alone. Clinically, this includes patients who fulfill the criteria for sepsis who, despite adequate fluid resuscitation, require vasopressors to maintain a mean arterial pressure ≥65 mmHg and have a lactate >2 mmol/L (>18 mg/dL). Feve is a common sign of infection in septic shock critically ill patients. Many critically ill patients experience pain. Paracetamol is considered safe and currently one of the most common antipyretics and used as part of multimodal analgesia for acute pain in the intensive care unit. According to the company's product information leaflet, the rate of hypotension complicating intravenous paracetamol treatment ranges from 0.01 to 0.1%. However, recent studies reported a much higher incidence and may be harmful in critically ill adults. The hemodynamic effects of intravenous (IV) paracetamol are unknown in septic shock patients, that the most vulnerable population and hemodynamically unstable. The aim of this study is to assess the incidence of hypotension of the extended intravenous paracetamol (acetaminophen) infusion over three hours in comparing with intravenous paracetamol bolus over 15 minutes in hemodynamically unstable patients (septic shock).
This study is being conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of VBI-S in elevating the blood pressure of septic shock patients with absolute or relative hypovolemia.
Since the ultimate target of resuscitation is the microcirculation, normal microcirculatory perfusion appears to be the primary target of ideal resuscitation in septic shock patients. In septic shock patients, microcirculation of the skin may be impaired in the early period due to early sympathetic nervous system activation. Assessment of skin perfusion has also become popular in shock resuscitation because it is easily accessible for clinical assessment. Studies in septic shock patients, showed that capillary refill time correlated with lactate levels measured at 6 hours of resuscitation and was associated with mortality. Additionally, early normalization of capillary refill time has been associated with improved survival in septic shock This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the change in capillary filling time (microcirculation) and organ perfusion after fluid resuscitation in sepsis patients in intensive care.
Over-resuscitation including fluid overload has been associated with increased morbidity (prolonged duration of organ failure) and mortality in septic shock. "One-size-fits-all" resuscitation strategies may increase septic shock mortality. However, clinical studies on individualized resuscitation are lacking. Hemodynamic phenotyping may allow to individualize septic shock resuscitation. The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK trial found that a simple clinical and bedside CRT-targeted resuscitation reduces organ dysfunction and 28-day mortality in septic shock. The current study will examine the hypothesis that a CRT-targeted resuscitation based on hemodynamic phenotyping considering within an decision tree usual bedside clinical parameters such as pulse pressure, diastolic blood pressure, fluid responsiveness and cardiac performance can further decrease mortality in septic shock as compared to usual care.