Shade Match Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation of Clinical Performance of Class IV Restoration Using Organically Modified Ceramic (OMNOCER) in Comparison to a Methacrylate Based Composite Resin a Randomized Clinical Trial
Verified date | December 2022 |
Source | Cairo University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Evaluation of clinical performance of class IV restoration using organically modified ceramic (ORMOCER) in comparison to a Methacrylate Based Composite Resin: A randomized clinical trial
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 26 |
Est. completion date | December 30, 2023 |
Est. primary completion date | December 30, 2023 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 40 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: participant: 1. Age of patient (18-40) years old. 2. Good oral hygiene. Teeth: 1. Having no active pulpal or periodontal conditions. 2. Normal Occlusion. 3. Able to return for follow-up assessments as illustrated by the examiners. - Exclusion Criteria: participant: 1. Patients with Edge-to-Edge occlusion. 2. Patients with high caries index. 3. Patients with uncontrolled para-functional habits (e.g. bruxism or clenching). 4. Patients with inadequate oral hygiene. 5. Patients with periodontal or gingival conditions. 6. Patients with orthodontic appliances. 7. Patients with spontaneous pain or sensitivity to percussion 8. Pregnant Patients - |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Egypt | Cairo university | Cairo |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Cairo University |
Egypt,
Barcellos DC, Batista GR, Silva MA, Pleffken PR, Rangel PM, Fernandes VV Jr, Di Nicolo R, Torres CR. Two-year clinical performance of self-etching adhesive systems in composite restorations of anterior teeth. Oper Dent. 2013 May-Jun;38(3):258-66. doi: 10.2341/11-397-C. Epub 2012 Oct 30. — View Citation
Blum SL, Horn M, Olms C. A comparison of intraoral spectrophotometers-Are there user-specific differences? J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 Sep;30(5):442-448. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12407. Epub 2018 Aug 25. — View Citation
Cetin AR, Unlu N, Cobanoglu N. A five-year clinical evaluation of direct nanofilled and indirect composite resin restorations in posterior teeth. Oper Dent. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):E1-11. doi: 10.2341/12-160-C. Epub 2012 Dec 5. — View Citation
Demirci M, Tuncer S, Sancakli HS, Tekce N, Baydemir C. Five-year Clinical Evaluation of a Nanofilled and a Nanohybrid Composite in Class IV Cavities. Oper Dent. 2018 May/Jun;43(3):261-271. doi: 10.2341/16-358-C. Epub 2018 Mar 13. — View Citation
Frese C, Wohlrab T, Soliman S, Hahn B, Busch C, Babai A, Krastl G, Wolff D. A Multicenter Trial on the Long-term Performance of Direct Composite Buildups in the Anterior Dentition - Survival and Quality Outcome. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(6):573-580. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a45514. — View Citation
Gresnigt MM, Kalk W, Ozcan M. Randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial of direct laminate veneers with two micro-hybrid resin composites. J Dent. 2012 Sep;40(9):766-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.05.010. Epub 2012 Jun 2. — View Citation
Karaman E, Yazici AR, Ozgunaltay G, Ustunkol I, Berber A. Clinical Evaluation of a Silorane- and a Methacrylate-Based Resin Composite in Class II Restorations: 24-Month Results. Oper Dent. 2017 Jul/Aug;42(4):E102-E110. doi: 10.2341/15-286-C. — View Citation
Llena C, Fernandez S, Forner L. Color stability of nanohybrid resin-based composites, ormocers and compomers. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 May;21(4):1071-1077. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1850-z. Epub 2016 May 16. — View Citation
Rajeev V, Arunachalam R, Nayar S, Arunima PR, Ganapathy S, Vedam V. "Ormocer an innovative technology": A replacement for conventional cements and veneer? A comparative in vitro analysis. Eur J Dent. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):58-63. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_113_16. — View Citation
Ribeiro JS, Peralta SL, Salgado VE, Lund RG. In situ evaluation of color stability and hardness' decrease of resin-based composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017 Sep;29(5):356-361. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12319. Epub 2017 Jul 24. — View Citation
Romero MF, Haddock FJ, Freites AG, Brackett WW, Brackett MG. Restorative Technique Selection in Class IV Direct Composite Restorations: A Simplified Method. Oper Dent. 2016 May-Jun;41(3):243-8. doi: 10.2341/15-158-T. Epub 2016 Feb 26. — View Citation
Ruschel VC, Martins MV, Bernardon JK, Maia HP. Color Match Between Composite Resin and Tooth Remnant in Class IV Restorations: A Case Series. Oper Dent. 2018 Sep/Oct;43(5):460-466. doi: 10.2341/17-132-S. Epub 2018 Mar 16. — View Citation
Sebold M, Lins RBE, Sahadi BO, Santi MR, Martins LRM, Giannini M. Microtensile Bond Strength, Bonding Interface Morphology, Adhesive Resin Infiltration, and Marginal Adaptation of Bulk-fill Composites Placed Using Different Adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2021 Oct 1;23(5):409-420. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b2000221. — View Citation
Torres C, Augusto MG, Mathias-Santamaria IF, Di Nicolo R, Borges AB. Pure Ormocer vs Methacrylate Composites on Posterior Teeth: A Double-blinded Randomized Clinical Trial. Oper Dent. 2020 Jul 1;45(4):359-367. doi: 10.2341/19-079-C. — View Citation
van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Fracture frequency and longevity of fractured resin composite, polyacid-modified resin composite, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement class IV restorations: an up to 14 years of follow-up. Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Apr;14(2):217-22. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0287-z. Epub 2009 Jun 6. — View Citation
* Note: There are 15 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Shade match | measured by Modified USPHS | T1: 1 week (baseline) | |
Primary | Shade match | measured by Modified USPHS | T2: 3 months | |
Primary | Shade match | measured by Modified USPHS | T3: 1 year. | |
Secondary | a) Retention rate | Modified united states public health service | T1: 1 week (baseline) | |
Secondary | a) Retention rate | Modified united states public health service | T2: 3 months | |
Secondary | a) Retention rate | Modified united states public health service | T3: 1 year |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04774614 -
Shade Match, Marginal Adaptation and Patient Satisfaction of VITA ENAMIC multiColor Versus IPS e.Max CAD Veneers
|
N/A |