Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Severe sepsis leads a high morbidity and mortality by causing organ damage at distance. The treatment relies on early antibiotic therapy and hemodynamic resuscitation. Hypothesis: high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) could reduce work of breathing and improve the outcome of patients with severe sepsis and peripheral perfusion. Objective: the aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of HFNC for improving sixty-day survival in patients with severe sepsis. Design: multicenter parallel-group randomized clinical trial. Method: 592 adult patients with a diagnosis of severe sepsis in the first 12 hours of admission in the Emergency Room will be randomly assigned to an experimental or control group. In the experimental group, HFNC will be administered until the resolution of sepsis or until required mechanical ventilation, either invasive or non-invasive. In the Control group, conventional oxygen will be administered, if required. Sixty-day survival will be the primary outcome. The study is powered to demonstrate an improvement in survival from 70% in control group up to 80% in the HFNC group. The secondary outcomes will be reducing the need for vital support (mechanical ventilation, dialysis, vasoactive drugs) and physiological (acidosis, clearance of lactate, SvO2 and SOFA). Statistical analysis: Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models will be calculated for all-cause sixty-day survival. If the results are conclusive, they will have immediate application in medical practice.


Clinical Trial Description

Severe sepsis is a syndrome associated with severe infections with a high morbidity and mortality. In its most severe form, septic shock still leads to an in-hospital mortality of up to 50%. The pathophysiology of severe sepsis / septic shock includes increased work of breathing to compensate for tissue hypoperfusion-induced metabolic acidosis. This exaggerated work of breathing requires increased consumption of oxygen by respiratory muscles, which calls for a greater percentage of the already insufficient cardiac output, which can aggravate tissue hypoperfusion. In the last decade, high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) appeared as an alternative ventilatory support intermediate between conventional oxygen and mechanical ventilation. Among others (3-7), the investigators have also demonstrated their effectiveness in patients with respiratory failure of different etiologies (8-11). Patients treated with HFNC quickly show a reduction of respiratory rate and respiratory work, associated with an improvement of the functional residual capacity and gas exchange. The absence of significant side effects and low cost makes HFNC especially attractive as adjunctive medical treatment in severe sepsis. Then, the hypothesis is that in patients with severe sepsis, high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy could reduce work of breathing, which would allow a redistribution of cardiac output from the respiratory muscles to other organs, improving peripheral perfusion with minor injury of organs at distance, less multiorgan failure and improved survival. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of HFNC for improving sixty-day survival in patients with severe sepsis. This study will also provide a detailed evaluation of the HFNC's effects on the need for vital support (mechanical ventilation, dialysis, vasoactive drugs) and physiological parameters (acidosis, clearance of lactate, SvO2 and SOFA). DESIGN Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in 592 patients with severe sepsis admitted into a network of 18 ICUs from university and community hospitals in Spain to define the role of high flow oxygen therapy, with one experimental arm that will receive high flow oxygen therapy and a control arm that will receive conventional oxygen therapy if required. Patients who consent will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive HFNC or conventional treatment, which consists of adding oxygen on nasal prongs or Venturi mask only if hypoxemia is detected as SpO2 < 92% by pulse oximetry. STUDY ARMS 1. HFNC therapy (experimental group) Treatment with HFNC (Airvo2® Fisher & Paykel, and AquaNASE® Armstrong Medical) will begin with high flow (50 L/min), high temperature and humidity and oxygen concentration adjusted for SpO2 >92%, even with FiO2 of 0.21, if needed. The rationale for this HFNC dosage is that minute ventilation can be already reduced with 30 L/min, but functional residual capacity and oxygenation maximally improve at higher flow. On the contrary, flow >50 L/min is uncomfortable for many patients. In the case of clinical intolerance, flow will be reduced to 40, 30 or 20 L/min. Yet it is not tolerated, HFNC will be stopped and patients will receive conventional oxygen if required, but will be evaluated as in the HFNC group by intention to treat. In HFNC patients we propose an extra caution to avoid delaying a mechanical ventilation that would be beneficial. To do this, the ROX index (ROX = SpO2/FiO2/respiratory rate) will be calculated and if it is < 5, it is recommended to assess mechanical ventilatory support, either invasive or non-invasive. 2. Conventional therapy (control group) Patients assigned to the conventional treatment will receive the standard care given at hospital which consists of adding oxygen on nasal prongs or Venturi mask only if hypoxemia is suggested by SpO2 < 92% by pulse oximetry. Target for oxygenation in both arms is SpO2 between 92% and 95%. SpO2 >95% without oxygen supply is acceptable. On the contrary, SpO2 <92% may be acceptable when needed for medical reasons, mainly chronic hypercapnic patients. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03334227
Study type Interventional
Source Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa
Contact
Status Terminated
Phase N/A
Start date January 8, 2018
Completion date December 28, 2020

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04804306 - Sepsis Post Market Clinical Utility Simple Endpoint Study - HUMC
Completed NCT04227652 - Control of Fever in Septic Patients N/A
Recruiting NCT04005001 - Machine Learning Sepsis Alert Notification Using Clinical Data Phase 2
Recruiting NCT02899143 - Short-course Antimicrobial Therapy in Sepsis Phase 2
Completed NCT02539147 - Characterization of Non-canonical Way in Inflammasome Monocytes of Patients With Severe Sepsis N/A
Completed NCT01929772 - German Lactat Clearance in Severe Sepsis N/A
Completed NCT01932814 - Acute Kidney Injury in Septic Critically Ill Patients : Are Aminoglycosides Really Harmful? N/A
Completed NCT01449721 - Preemptive Resuscitation for Eradication of Septic Shock N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT01162109 - Zinc Therapy in Critical Illness Phase 1
Not yet recruiting NCT01211899 - 4G/5G Polymorphism of Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Gene and Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock N/A
Completed NCT00934011 - Use of Inflammatory Biomarkers to Guide Antibiotic Therapy in Patients With Severe Infections N/A
Recruiting NCT00335907 - Protocol-driven Hemodynamic Support for Patients With Septic Shock N/A
Completed NCT00463645 - Investigation of Correlation Between Interstitial and Arterial Blood Glucose Concentrations in Septic Patients N/A
Completed NCT02361528 - GM-CSF to Decrease ICU Acquired Infections Phase 3
Completed NCT02734550 - (1,3)-β-D-glucan Based Diagnosis of Invasive Candida Infection in Sepsis N/A
Completed NCT02973243 - The Vital Signs to Identify, Target, and Assess Level (VITAL) Care Study III N/A
Terminated NCT03895853 - Early Metabolic Resuscitation for Septic Shock Phase 2
Completed NCT01945983 - Early Use of Norepinephrine in Septic Shock Resuscitation N/A
Completed NCT01598831 - Phase 3 Safety and Efficacy Study of ART-123 in Subjects With Severe Sepsis and Coagulopathy Phase 3
Enrolling by invitation NCT02258984 - Can the Venus 1000 Help Clinicians Treat Patients With Severe Sepsis or Acute Heart Failure? The CVP Trial N/A