Severe Sepsis With Septic Shock Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluating a CytoSorb Score in Septic Shock - a Retrospective Multicenter Data Analysis
Systemic hyperinflammatory states, e.g. triggered by infection/sepsis, represent a major
challenge for modern medicine. After an initially localized onset, inflammation can extend to
an excessive, uncontrolled inflammatory reaction affecting the entire body and can trigger
circulatory failure with subsequent irreversible multiple organ failure. Despite all the
medical advances made in recent years, sepsis continues to be a substantial problem, as
almost all therapeutic approaches have failed to prove their efficacy to date. Mortality in
this clinical entity thus remains extremely high. In Germany alone, more than 100,000 people
suffer from sepsis or septic shock every year, nearly half of whom die despite optimal
therapy. Thus, sepsis is the third most common cause of death, has major importance both from
a medical but also from an economical viewpoint, and approaches that could contribute to its
successful treatment need to be further developed and explored.
If a patient experiences the spread of bacteria or their constituents in the blood stream due
to an uncontrolled source of infection, the result is a deliberately triggered physiological
defense reaction of the body. In many patients, however, there is a pathological
dysregulation of these mechanisms, in a way that the defense reaction goes far beyond the
physiological level required, resulting in an excessive immune response of the body, which is
mainly facilitated by inflammatory mediators such as cytokines and chemokines. The immune
response spreads throughout the body and also dissipates into organs unaffected by the
original infection. In cases of such unwanted overshooting immune responses, an attempt to
regain control of the described deleterious systemic events seems reasonable by removing the
excess amount of cytokines from the blood, thus preventing or treating organ failure.
In this context, current therapeutic approaches increasingly focus on the elimination of
inflammatory mediators.
In recent years, hemoadsorption, using a new adsorber (CytoSorb), has been used to treat
sepsis and other conditions of hyperinflammation. The advantage of this therapeutic principle
is that a wide range of inflammatory mediators are removed. In conjunction with the enormous
elimination capacity, the effective and rapid reduction of mediators can be achieved.
To date, there have been more than 61,000 treatments using this procedure worldwide without
device-related side effects being reported. The investigators have been treating patients
with this procedure for over 5 years with consistently very favorable results. Therefore, the
investigators would like to expand and deepen their observations with the proposed project.
The primary effects of CytoSorb therapy, are, among many others, an improvement in
hemodynamics, metobolism, and capillary integrity, with effects of adsorption seeming to
reach far beyond mere cytokine adsorption.
Clinically, several publications have shown that certain patient populations benefit most
from adjuvant CytoSorb treatment.
In a case series from the investigators department, they examined the effects of CytoSorb as
an adjunctive therapy on hemodynamics and on clinically relevant outcome parameters in 26
patients with septic shock and the indication for renal replacement therapy. Treatment was
associated with hemodynamic stabilization and reduction in blood lactate levels. The actual
mortality was lower than predicted by APACHE II score. This effect was more pronounced in
patients in whom therapy was initiated within 24 hours of sepsis diagnosis. Medical patients
seemed to benefit more than post-surgical patients in terms of survival.
Based on these results, the investigators performed another study in seven patients with
septic shock and ECMO (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation)-dependent acute respiratory
distress syndrome (ARDS) treated with a combination therapy of CytoSorb, continuous renal
replacement therapy (CRRT) and veno-venous ECMO. The combined treatment was associated with a
significant stabilization in hemodynamics and a marked reduction in hyperlactatemia. In
addition, patients also showed a significant improvement in lung function and invasiveness of
ventilation, and the disease severity and organ dysfunction decreased significantly over the
course of the combined treatment, while the observed mortality was only half that predicted
by the APACHE II score. The investigators conclude that CytoSorb may be a potentially
promising treatment option for patients with refractory ARDS under ECMO therapy in the
context of septic shock.
Friesecke et al. prospectively investigated CytoSorb cytokine adsorption in combination with
standard of care in 20 patients with refractory septic shock (defined as increasing
vasopressor dosages to maintain a MAP of 65mmHg or increasing lactate levels despite
protocol-based shock therapy over 6 hours). CytoSorb therapy was started on average after
7.8±3.7 hours of shock therapy. After initiating CytoSorb, norepinephrine dosages could be
significantly reduced both after 6 (p=0.03) and 12 (p=0.001) hours. Lactate clearance also
improved significantly. Reversal of septic shock was achieved in 13 (65%) patients, with a
28-day survival rate of 45% (with a SOFA predicted mortality of >80%). Treatment with
CytoSorb resulted in shock reversal in 2/3 of these difficult-to-treat patients. Data from
the CytoSorb registry also support these observations.
In summary, these data show that certain subgroups of patients (in particular those with
pneumonia as well as the most critically ill patients with an APACHE score >35) particularly
benefit from CytoSorb treatment and that an early onset of therapy (at best <24 hours after
diagnosis of septic shock) appears to be beneficial and associated with an increased survival
rate.
Given the available information, the investigators analyzed their existing data for dynamic
scoring of the first 6 hours in septic shock, based on the study by Ferreira et al. This
study showed, that a trend assessment of the SOFA score during the first few days after
admission to the intensive care unit allowed for a very good prognosis of the patient's
eventual outcome.
The Investigators retrospectively screened data using threshold values for lactate,
catecholamine demand, volume requirements, and the need for additional adjuvant therapy with
a second catecholamine, and or the application of hydrocortisone.
In this first data analysis, there was an advantage in terms of survival in those patients
with pneumonia, in those where Cytosorb therapy was started at least within the first 24
hours of refractory shock, and in patients with slightly higher scores. The investigators
subsequently collected this retrospective score in all patients treated at their department
who were diagnosed with septic shock according to sepsis-3 criteria in the years 2014-2018.
Once again, the benefit - this time also compared to non-Cytosorb-treated patients - could be
confirmed.
In order to validate these internal data against neutral other patients, the investigators
plan the retrospective data analysis described herein performed as a multi-center study with
3 additional departments which also use CytoSorb therapy. The project involves colleagues
from Switzerland (Dr. Hübner, Münsterlingen), Germany (Dr. Jarczak, UK Eppendorf Hamburg) and
from Austria (Dr. Schwameis, Baden). Overall, data from approximately 500 patients will be
retrospectively collected and analyzed (of which approximately 1/3 patients have been treated
with CytoSorb).
The aim is to create a new assessment system based on established, clinically well-available
parameters such as lactate, volume and catecholamine therapy to identify patients with early
refractory septic shock (Sepsis-3), who would benefit most from adjuvant therapy with
Cytosorb hemoadsorption.
For this purpose, physiological patient-related treatment data from patients with septic
shock who received CytoSorb treatment will be retrospectively compared to a control group
that did not receive this treatment.
Patients who meet the above mentioned inclusion criteria, i.e. who are in a state of septic
shock according to the Sepsis-3 definition (sepsis + catecholamine therapy and volume therapy
+ lactate >2 mmol/l) will be included. Data of included patients will be entered into a data
matrix (see chapter 'Assessed parameters'). Each parameter is documented at the time of
diagnosis of septic shock as well as 6 hours later to analyze the dynamic process in the
early phase of septic shock. The threshold values are based on Sepsis-3 criteria of septic
shock (lactate level >2 mmol/l), the administration of norepinephrine according to the SOFA
score (norepinephrine > 0.2 μg/kg/min) and volume requirement according to the Surviving
Sepsis Guidelines (initial bolus 30 ml/kg body weight).
Each pathological value is rated with 2 points. Decreasing values or no change during the 6
hours observation period receive no points, increasing values receive 1 point, increasing
values >50% of the initial value receive 2 points (see data matrix). If <2 volume boluses are
necessary, this is rated with 1 point, when ≥2 boluses are necessary within 6 hours, this is
scored with 2 points.
In this matrix, septic shock is typically represented by a score of 5 points. Six or more
points indicate a situation that is no longer responsive to standard therapy. All data are
stored in the respective HIS of the hospitals involved and can be accessed. Centralized data
processing will take place at the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
at Emden Hospital. The investigators will provide their data anonymously in a tabular format.
Each parameter at the time of septic shock diagnosis (T0h) and 6 hours (T6h) later is
documented to analyze the dynamic process in early septic shock.
In addition, values for laboratory diagnostic parameters are also collected 3 days after the
diagnosis of septic shock (T72h).
The personal data and findings collected as part of this research project are subject to
confidentiality and data protection regulations. They are recorded on paper and stored
pseudonymized (encrypted) on data carriers in the participating institutions for a period of
10 years. Name and other identifiers are replaced by a multi-digit code to exclude or
substantially complicate the identification of study participants. Only the respective study
physician in his or her own center has access to the code which allows a personal assignment
of the data of the study participant. As soon as the research purpose allows, the code will
be deleted and the data collected will be anonymized. Only the respective study physician can
access the data of the patients in their own center. The data are transmitted in a tabular
format without any possibility of identification (neither patient-related nor time-related)
to the principal study center (Emden Hospital) and provided there with a consecutive number.
Access to the data of the individual participating study centers is not possible.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02449928 -
Using Sodium Lactate Ringer's Injection Resuscitate Septic Shock Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02339649 -
Long-term Cognitive and Cerebral Changes in Sepsis Survivors and Their Predictors
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05108467 -
Saving Lives by Early Detection and Treatment of Sepsis and Septic Shock by Point of Care Lactate Test in Adults
|
||
Completed |
NCT02353910 -
VTE Incidence in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02640807 -
A Study of IL-7 to Restore Absolute Lymphocyte Counts in Sepsis Patients
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02135770 -
Impact of Low Dose Unfractionated Heparin Treatment on Inflammation in Sepsis
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT02797431 -
Immune Reconstitution of Immunosuppressed Sepsis Patients
|
Phase 2 |