Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05578534
Other study ID # MD-194-2019
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date December 1, 2020
Est. completion date October 1, 2022

Study information

Verified date October 2022
Source Cairo University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational [Patient Registry]

Clinical Trial Summary

Background The arteriovenous difference of partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) between mixed or central venous blood and arterial blood is the ∆PCO2 or CO2 gap. Previous data demonstrated a strong relationship between ∆PCO2 and cardiac index (CI) at the very early phase of resuscitation in septic shock. Monitoring the ∆PCO2 from the beginning of the resuscitation may be a useful tool to assess the adequacy of cardiac output (CO) in tissue perfusion. Aim of work: To examine behavior of ∆PCO2 during early management of septic shock. Methodology: Seventy-six patients with diagnosis of septic shock admitted to critical care department, Cairo university hospitals. We classified the study population according to initial resuscitation response, initial CO2 gap, or 28-days mortality. The response vs non-response to initial resuscitation, ICU morbidity and recovery rate were the study primary outcomes while secondary outcomes included ICU length of stay (LOS) and 28-day ICU Mortality.


Description:

Introduction Shock is defined as a life-threatening, generalized acute circulatory failure with inadequate cellular oxygen utilization [1]. One of the goals of acute circulatory failure treatment is to increase cardiac output [2]. The ∆PCO2 is defined by the difference in the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) between mixed or central venous blood and arterial blood [1]. The ∆PCO2 has been correlated to outcome and mortality [3]. The mixed ∆PCO2 difference has been shown to be inversely correlated with the cardiac index (CI). A central venous PCO2, which is easier to obtain, may provide similar information. Substitution of a central for a mixed ∆PCO2 provides an accepted alternative [4]. Measurements of central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) and ∆PCO2 were advised to assess adequacy of cardiac output as well as to guide therapy [5]. A normal CO2 gap indicates that CO is high enough to wash out CO2 from peripheral tissue. Either PCO2 gap or the PCO2 gap to arterio-venous O2 content difference ratio could be used to guide resuscitation therapy [6]. ∆PCO2 value of >6 mmHg suggests an insufficient blood flow in the tissues even when the ScvO2 is >70 % [1]. Aim of work Our aim of the study is to investigate the value of PCO2 gap changes in the early septic shock management compared to the cardiac output. Patients and methods The study was approved by the ethical committee of faculty of medicine, Cairo University (N-194-2019) A written informed consent was obtained from patient's first degree relatives. Sample size calculation Based on past review of literature and by using G power software (version 3.1.3, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf Germany) with a power of 0.90 and 0.05 alpha error, sample size was calculated to be 69 patients. With a withdrawal/non-evaluable subject rate of 10%, a total of 76 patients will be recruited. Type of the study An observational prospective study was conducted on 76 consecutive adult patients admitted to critical care department of Cairo university hospitals with septic shock and elevated blood lactate level > 2 mmol/ L requiring fluid resuscitation and/ or vasopressor drugs infusion. Duration : between December 2020 to March 2022 Definitions Sepsis is identified by suspected or confirmed infection AND an organ dysfunction as defined by a sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) [7]. Organ dysfunction defined by an increase in SOFA score of 2 points or more (sepsis-related) from up to 48 hours before to up to 24 hours after the onset of suspected infection [8]. Septic shock is clinically identified by a vasopressor requirement to maintain a mean arterial pressure of 65 mm Hg or greater and serum lactate level greater than 2 mmol/L (>18 mg/dL) in the absence of hypovolemia [7]. Inclusion criteria The study population were included immediately on admission to ICU after fulfilling inclusion criteria. Exclusion criteria Patients with advanced cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, or renal diseases were excluded from enrolment. Our patients were resuscitated according to surviving sepsis campaign recommendations within 1 hr of recognition. The study cohort were included immediately on admission to ICU and after insertion of invasive lines (T0). The resuscitation targets were MAP ≥ 65 mmHg, urine output ≥ 0.5 ml/kg/min, ScvO2 ≥ 70%, normalization or significant decrease of serum lactate concentration. Infusion of vasopressors during or after fluid resuscitation if MAP cannot be maintained, and infusion of dobutamine if evidence of myocardial dysfunction or ongoing hypoperfusion despite optimizing intravascular volume. The 1st set of measurements were taken after insertion of invasive lines (T0) & 2nd set of measurements were taken (T1) after completion the initial resuscitation when stable MAP by a fluid boluses of up to 30 ml/kg iv and/or by vasopressor infusion or after 3 hours which is closer. Patients' demographics, comorbidities, APACHE II score up on ICU admission, SOFA score (initial and after 48 hrs), arterial lactate, ∆PCO2, blood gases (ABG, cvVBG), vital signs, echocardiographic LVOT cardiac output and index data were collected. The microbiological data, source of sepsis, relevant laboratory data, vasopressor/inotropic support, ventilatory support, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) needs along with ICU-morbidities and readmissions were recorded. Lactate clearance was calculated as a percentage ratio of (initial arterial lactate level at T0 - arterial lactate level at 6 hours after treatment)/ arterial lactate level at T0. The P/F ratio, ∆PCO2 (before and after resuscitation), PCO2 Gap at T1/PCO2 Gap at T0 (gap/gap ratio) and cardiac index responsiveness was calculated as well. The patients were classified according to initial ∆PCO2, resuscitation response, and 28-days mortality into: 1. High gap (Pcv-aCO2 > 6 mmHg) vs normal gap (Pcv-aCO2 ≤6 mmHg) [9] [10], 2. Responsive (15% increase in CI or stable MAP was achieved) vs non-responsive (< 15% increase in CI or a stable MAP was not achieved) [11] [12] 3. Survivors vs non-survivors The gap/gap ratio is an expression of the trend of ∆PCO2 level during resuscitation and thus, it can be reflection of prognosis and outcome. Response to resuscitation: investigators defined the positive response to initial resuscitation as an increase in CI by 15% or a stable MAP was achieved within or after completion of the 1st 3 hrs post-enrolment. This cut-off value was chosen by the reference to previous studies.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 76
Est. completion date October 1, 2022
Est. primary completion date September 30, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - adult patients admitted to critical care department of Cairo university hospitals with septic shock and elevated blood lactate level > 2 mmol/ L requiring fluid resuscitation and/ or vasopressor drugs infusion. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with advanced cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, or renal diseases were excluded from enrolment.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Locations

Country Name City State
Egypt Critical care department Cairo

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Cairo University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary The response to initial resuscitation response to intial resuscitation with IV fluids and vasopressors measured by PCO2 gap 6 hours
Secondary ICU length of stay (LOS) and 28-day mortality correlation of measuring PCO2 gap as a resuscitation measure with ICU stay and mortality 28 days
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT03649633 - Vitamin C, Steroids, and Thiamine, and Cerebral Autoregulation and Functional Outcome in Septic Shock Phase 1/Phase 2
Terminated NCT04117568 - The Role of Emergency Neutrophils and Glycans in Postoperative and Septic Patients
Completed NCT04227652 - Control of Fever in Septic Patients N/A
Completed NCT05629780 - Temporal Changes of Lactate in CLASSIC Patients N/A
Recruiting NCT04796636 - High-dose Intravenous Vitamin C in Patients With Septic Shock Phase 1
Terminated NCT03335124 - The Effect of Vitamin C, Thiamine and Hydrocortisone on Clinical Course and Outcome in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Phase 4
Recruiting NCT04005001 - Machine Learning Sepsis Alert Notification Using Clinical Data Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05217836 - Iron Metabolism Disorders in Patients With Sepsis or Septic Shock.
Recruiting NCT05066256 - LV Diastolic Function vs IVC Diameter Variation as Predictor of Fluid Responsiveness in Shock N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05443854 - Impact of Aminoglycosides-based Antibiotics Combination and Protective Isolation on Outcomes in Critically-ill Neutropenic Patients With Sepsis: (Combination-Lock01) Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT04516395 - Optimizing Antibiotic Dosing Regimens for the Treatment of Infection Caused by Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae N/A
Recruiting NCT02899143 - Short-course Antimicrobial Therapy in Sepsis Phase 2
Recruiting NCT02580240 - Administration of Hydrocortisone for the Treatment of Septic Shock N/A
Recruiting NCT02676427 - Fluid Responsiveness in Septic Shock Evaluated by Caval Ultrasound Doppler Examination
Recruiting NCT02565251 - Volemic Resuscitation in Sepsis and Septic Shock N/A
Completed NCT02638545 - Hemodynamic Effects of Dexmedetomidine in Septic Shock Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT02547467 - TOADS Study: TO Assess Death From Septic Shock. N/A
Terminated NCT02335723 - ASSET - a Double-Blind, Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Investigation With Alteco® LPS Adsorber N/A
Completed NCT02204852 - Co-administration of Iloprost and Eptifibatide in Septic Shock Patients Phase 2
Completed NCT02079402 - Conservative vs. Liberal Approach to Fluid Therapy of Septic Shock in Intensive Care Phase 4