View clinical trials related to Septic Shock.
Filter by:The Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Monitor (NICOM) is a non-invasive monitor capable of measuring cardiac output (CO) and cardiac index (CI), and stroke volume (SV) and stroke volume index (SVI) based on heart rate. Conceptually NICOM is a technology that utilizes a dynamic response characteristic in assessing the need for fluid administration, whereby SVI is measured before and after a fluid challenge with more fluid given only if SVI increases significantly with administered fluid. Dynamic response technologies are intended to replace older, "static" measures such as central venous pressure (CVP) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures (PCWP) which are single point measurements utilized to assess the need to administer fluid. The aim is to pilot and evaluate the effectiveness of using The Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Monitor (NICOM) technology for goal-directed fluid resuscitation in adult inpatients with sepsis associated acute hypotension and/or evidence of septic shock (Lactate >= 4.0).
This study aim to examine if randomization to different treatment strategies had any effect on the time to normalization of lactate in intensive care patients treated for septic shock.
During acute circulatory failure, volume expansion does not always lead to a significant increase in cardiac output (fluid responsiveness). After initial resuscitation by rapid fluid administration, cardiac preload is no longer extremely low and only half of the patients respond to further volume expansion with the expected increase in cardiac output (fluid unresponsiveness). However, the time delay or the volume of fluid needed to be administered from the state of fluid responsiveness to fluid unresponsiveness is still not determined. Objective To determine, in critically ill patients with acute circulatory failure, 1. : the time and/or the volume of fluid needed from the state of fluid responsiveness to fluid unresponsiveness during septic shock. 2. : determine the factors that influence this time and volume.
Introduction Aim of the work Patients and methods Type of study Exclusion criteria Statistical analysis Research ethics Reference
The popuse of this study is to assess the inflammatory immunophenotypes of sepsis patients are significantly correlated with prognosis, which may provide theoretical basis for precise immune regulation of sepsis.
- Testing the association between circulating candidate proteins and the level of vascular leakage for three distinct forms of circulatory failure: cardiogenic shock, septic shock, and post-resuscitation syndrome. - Describing immuno-inflammatory profiles associated with massive vascular leakage during those three forms of circulatory failure in humans
Background The arteriovenous difference of partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) between mixed or central venous blood and arterial blood is the ∆PCO2 or CO2 gap. Previous data demonstrated a strong relationship between ∆PCO2 and cardiac index (CI) at the very early phase of resuscitation in septic shock. Monitoring the ∆PCO2 from the beginning of the resuscitation may be a useful tool to assess the adequacy of cardiac output (CO) in tissue perfusion. Aim of work: To examine behavior of ∆PCO2 during early management of septic shock. Methodology: Seventy-six patients with diagnosis of septic shock admitted to critical care department, Cairo university hospitals. We classified the study population according to initial resuscitation response, initial CO2 gap, or 28-days mortality. The response vs non-response to initial resuscitation, ICU morbidity and recovery rate were the study primary outcomes while secondary outcomes included ICU length of stay (LOS) and 28-day ICU Mortality.
We aimed to determine if metformin use in both diabetic and non diabetic patients with sepsis and septic shock affects 28 day mortality and its effect on inflammatory markers. Plasma rennin, serum lactate concentration and IL6 will be measured for predicting 28 days in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis.
Infections due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae are a major public health concern, in particular in the intensive care unit (ICU), due to the increase in their incidence. Carbapenems are the treatment of choice of these infections, but their increased use may select for carbapenem resistance in Gram-negative bacilli, which currently represents the greatest threat in terms of antibiotic resistance. Several retrospective studies have shown that the use of non-carbapenem antibiotics (mainly the association of piperacillin/tazobactam, but also cefepime and temocillin) may be safe alternatives to carbapenems to treat these pathogens when the strain is susceptible to the corresponding antibiotic. However, one recent randomized controlled study, the Merino trial, failed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of piperacillin/tazobactam, as compared to meropenem, in patients with Gram-negative bacilli bacteremia resistant to third generation cephalosporins (mainly ESBL producers). However, the patients included in that study were not ICU patients, dosing and modalities of piperacillin/tazobactam administration were not optimal (30-min infusion whereas 4-hours infusion may be associated with better outcome), and cause of death of patients in the piperacillin/tazobactam arm were not due to antimicrobial treatment failure (mostly death due to care withdrawal in cancer patients). Recently, a retrospective bicenter study performed in ICU patients showed that outcome of patients with severe infection (i.e. sepsis and septic shock according to the Sepsis-3 definition) due to ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae susceptible to non-carbapenem agents treated with a non-carbapenem agent was similar to that of patients treated with carbapenems. Given the scarcity of data in ICU patients, the disputable results of the Merino trial, we will therefore conduct a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial of non-carbapenem beta-lactam (piperacillin/tazobactam or temocillin) treatment vs. meropenem treatment for ESBL-producing Enterobaceriaceae severe infection in ICU patients. Our hypothesis is that a non-carbapenem beta-lactam treatment is non-inferior to carbapenem treatment in patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae severe infection in the ICU.
Fluid therapy is important in patients with sepsis and septic shock. There are many invasive and non-invasive methods to assess fluid responsiveness in patients. The specificities and sensitivities of these methods are highly variable. The reason for our study was to determine end-tidal co2 and fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the fluid response using the End-tidal CO2 difference in septic shock patients receiving intubated mechanical ventilation support.