View clinical trials related to Septic Shock.
Filter by:Sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Intensive care unit (ICU) mortality in patients with septic shock and acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) remains high and approximates 50-60%. Sepsis is the leading etiology for AKI and CRRT requirement in ICU patients. In septic shock, the dysregulated host response to infectious pathogens leads to a cytokine storm with uncontrolled production and release of humoral pro-inflammatory mediators. These pro-inflammatory mediators and cytokines exert cellular toxicity and promote the development of organ dysfunction and increased mortality. In addition to treating AKI, CRRT techniques can be employed for adsorption of inflammatory mediators extracorporally using specially developed adsorption membranes, hemoperfusion sorbent cartridges or columns. Several methods and devices, such as Oxiris®-AN69 membrane, CytoSorb® cytokine hemoadsorption and polymyxin B (Toraymyxin) endotoxin adsorption and plasmapheresis have been evaluated in small study series but to date the data on outcome benefits remains controversial. HA380 (Jafron Biomedical Co , Ltd, Zhuhai, China) is a CE-labeled hemoadsorption cartridge developed to treat patients with septic shock. It contains hemo-compatible, porous polymeric beads that adsorp cytokines and mid-molecular weight toxins on their surface. The cytokines absorved using this cartridge are IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 in addition to TNF-α8. Therefore, this study aims to examine the potential effects of cytokine adsorption using HA380 in addition to hemodiafiltration with the Oxiris®-AN69 membrane on ICU- and 90-day mortality in patients with septic shock and AKI.
This is a single-center prospective bio-specimen analysis and observational study aiming to define immune pathways disrupted in bacterial sepsis and to identify clinically useful biomarkers of immune status.
To assess the performance of the CytoSorb® 300 mL device for shock reversal in patients with vasoplegic septic shock.
The assessment of left ventricular systolic function is based on the measurement of left ventricular ejection function (LVEF) by the Simpson biplane method. More recently, left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) has been developed to detect abnormalities of cardiac contractility in patients with preserved myocardial contractility. However, both tools are not always easy to collect in practice. This is why other ultrasound parameters have been proposed in the literature as a substitute for LVEF and GLS such as the Doppler tissue imaging (DTI)-derived mitral annular systolic peak S-wave velocity (S'), the mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) and the longitudinal wall fractional shortening index (LWFS). The purpose of this project is to propose an algorithm using simple parameters (S' wave, lateral MAPSE, septal MAPSE, mean MAPSE and LWFS) to predict LVEF and GLS in order to diagnose patients with impaired systolic function and preserved ejection.
Background: Recent studies have questioned the safety of current fluid resuscitation strategies in patients with septic shock as prospective and observational data suggesting that the resulting fluid overload is associated with mortality. Two strategies have evolved to prevent or minimize fluid overload: restrictive fluid administration or active removal of accumulated fluid. While several small trials show benefits with a restrictive fluid administration regimen, active protocolized de-resuscitation was scarcely evaluated. The combination of both strategies yet warrants systematic evaluation. Aim: This study aims to assess the efficacy and feasibility of an early active de-resuscitation protocol in patients with septic shock. We hypothesize that the application of a structured early de-resuscitation protocol versus standard of care will lead to less fluid overload at day three after ICU admission. Study Intervention: Patients admitted to the ICU with confirmed or suspected septic shock (Sepsis-3 definition) will be randomized (1:1) to either the intervention or standard of care. In the intervention arm, patients are managed according to the REDUCE fluid management protocol during resuscitation and de-resuscitation.
The objectives of this study are to evaluate the effect of continuous intravenous Landiolol injection (from 0.5 to 10 µg/kg/min during 12 hours ) up to a 15% decrease in Heart Rate (HR) on microcirculatory vascular reactivity vs. usual tachycardia management and evaluate the hemodynamic effects of Landiolol vs. usual management in patients with septic shock.
Randomized, unblinded clinical trial of 152 critically ill patients with sepsis admitted to the intensive care unit. The primary determine if using the Venous Excess Ultrasound Score (VExUS) to guide fluid deresuscitation in critically ill patients with sepsis reduces net fluid balance at 5 days as compared to usual care.
This clinical study adopts the design of cohort research, selects the sepsis shock patients admitted to our hospital ICU as the research object, takes the 28-day mortality rate as the outcome index, collects the baseline data of the patient, the severity of the disease, vital signs, the main infection site, the laboratory-related index, the treatment method and other data, screens out the risk factors affecting the sepsis shock 28-day mortality rate and constructs the prediction model accordingly, analyzes the prediction model with the subject's working characteristic curve (ROC). The recognition ability of the model is calculated by the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and the ability of the model to predict 28-day mortality with SOFA and APACHE II.
The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of norepinephrine and fluid expansion on capillary refill time during septic shock.
New-onset supraventricular arrhythmia (NOSVA) is reported in 40 % of patients with septic shock and is associated with hemodynamic alterations and mortality. The lack of consensus regarding best practices for the management of NOSVA in this setting has led to major variations in practice patterns. Observational studies reported three usual strategies: (i) heart rate control (hereafter rate control) with the use of antiarrhythmic drugs, essentially based on low dose of amiodarone, (ii) rhythm control with the use of antiarrhythmic drugs, essentially based on high dose of amiodarone, and electrical cardioversionand (iii) modifiable NOSVA risk factors control (hereafter risk control) without using antiarrhythmic drugs. Risk control would minimize adverse events of antiarrhythmic drugs. Rhythm control would rapidly improve haemodynamics via restoring diastole and decreasing cardiac metabolic demand, while minimizing exposure to anticoagulation. Rate control, would limit potential adverse events of high dose of amiodarone and of electrical cardioversion (only in patients intubated on mechanical ventilation), while controlling haemodynamics. Therefore, it seems important to compare these three strategies. Our hypothesis is dual: first, that rate control and rhythm control each improve hemodynamics with in fine a decreased mortality, as compared to a risk control; second, that rhythm control outperforms rate control in this setting. This is a multicenter, parallel-group, open-label, randomized controlled superiority trial to compare the effectiveness and safety of these three strategies (risk control, rate control and rhythm control) for NOSVA during septic shock.