View clinical trials related to Septic Shock.
Filter by:This study is designed to improve the outcomes for patients suffering from severe sepsis and septic shock (SS/SS) by decreasing the time from first medical contact to antibiotic administration. This is a stepwise study that aims to demonstrate the ability of paramedics to accurately obtain blood cultures prior to hospital arrival, administer a broad spectrum antibiotic and initiate IV fluid resuscitation in patients meeting predefined criteria for SS/SS.
The objective of this project is to determine if in patients admitted to the hospital with septic shock (population), does treatment with a bundle including hydrocortisone, thiamine, and ascorbic acid improve in-hospital or 28-day mortality (primary outcomes) or surrogate markers of illness severity including: (1) ICU or hospital length-of-stay, (2) duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, (3) duration of vasopressor administration, (4) incidence and severity of ICU delirium, and (5) illness severity (secondary outcomes).
The purpose of this trial is to investigate the efficacy and safety of continuous intravenous administration of low dose iloprost versus placebo for 72-hours, in up to a total of 380 patients with septic shock suffering from organ failure. The study hypothesis is that iloprost may be beneficial as an endothelial rescue treatment as it is anticipated to deactivate the endothelium and restore vascular integrity in septic shock patients suffering from organ failure caused by endothelial breakdown, ultimately improving survival.
Surgical trauma elicits an immune response aiming to initiate healing and remove debris and damaged tissue locally at the wound site (1). This local reaction includes a considerable production of cytokines and chemokines that enters the circulation and initiate a systemic inflammatory response mediated by circulating cytokines and chemokines. This response is called systemic inflammatory immune response (SIRS) and is an aseptic systemic inflammation. Postoperative inflammation produces proinflammatory cytokines, mainly IL-6, IL1 beta, and tumor necrosis factor alfa (2). Neutrophils and emergency granulopoesis Polymorphonuclear neutrophils constitute the most abundant population of white blood cells. Their main task is to provide innate immune protection of the host from microbial attack, migrating to the site of infection, engulfing the microbes by phagocytosis, and killing the prey through attack by reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antimicrobial granule pro¬teins (22). Upon systemic infection or inflammation, e.g., sepsis or trauma, the bone marrow enters a state of emergency granulopoiesis, drenched in cytokines that augment production and survival of neutrophils for rapid delivery to the blood (23-25). Recently, advanced techniques have evolved that al¬low the isolation of different developmental stages of steady-state and emergency neutrophils, and characterization of these has just begun (26). Glycans Glycans (polysaccharides) attached to proteins and lipids on the surfaces on immune cells serve as ligands for glycan-binding proteins, lectins. Several neutrophil processes are directed by gly¬can - lectin interactions; selectin-directed rolling on the endothelium, siglec-mediated in¬hibitory signals, and activation of effector function by galectins. Many of the proteins that end up in neutrophil intra-cellular granules are highly glycosylated, but not much is known about if and how the neutrophil glycome evolves during the 'targeting-by-timing' process of differentiation and how this is affected by emergency granulopoiesis during systemic infection and inflammation. Here is a clear knowledge gap.
Due to the high incidence, mortality and short and long term complications of sepsis and septic shock, it is necessary to look for strategies to try to minimize this impact.
Knowing the dramatic increase in thrombin generation during sepsis, our research hypothesis is that AMPK-induced ACC phosphorylation in platelets is increased and that this might modulate platelets metabolism and more particularly platelets inflammatory mediators content, coming from AA and lipids.
The performance and clinical impact of two diagnostic systems will be evaluated using whole blood samples that are collected in parallel with samples for blood culture. As the rapid diagnostic systems will have the largest impact on severely ill patients (in need of a fast diagnosis) with bacterial infection, the evaluation will be performed in patients suspected of bacteraemia. During the study the new systems will be used in parallel with routine blood cultures. In alternating periods of 1 month, the results of the diagnostic system will be communicated to treating physicians (intervention) or not revealed (control). Blood culture results will be reported throughout the complete study period. Patients with suspected sepsis at the Emergency Department (ED), the department of infectious diseases/nephrology, and the department of haemodialysis will be included. In routine care, two blood culture sets (2x2 bottles) per patient are collected. One extra blood sample (EDTA tube, 9 ml of blood) will be sampled for each routine set of blood cultures. In addition, the clinical data of the patients will be collected. The samples will be sent to the clinical laboratory where samples are tested with the new systems during regular working hours in batches of 8 samples per run (2-3 runs per day). On average, 10%-20% of the blood cultures drawn on the presumption of bacteraemia yield bacterial pathogens. Previous data show that 13% of patients yield positive blood cultures. Thus, in order to collect blood samples of 100 new episodes of bacteraemia approximately 1000 patients (2000 blood cultures + 1000 EDTA tubes) have to be collected for each system (2000 patients in total). The results of the systems will be used to evaluate the clinical utility of the system regarding time to antibiotic treatment change and bacteraemia management. The system will be used directly for the diagnosis of patients, resulting in a possible change of treatment strategy. However, routine blood culture practices will still be done during the whole study period.
This prospective observational study will include critically ill patients with hemodynamic compromise. It will compare passive leg raising and a mini volume challenge (MVC) carried out on every patient sequentially. The endogenous release of stress hormones will also be assayed in order to investigate their modifying effect on the hemodynamic reaction of the participants. The effect of fluid resuscitation on renal perfusion will also be assessed and the data compared with the release of cystatin C.
A randomized, prospective study comparing ProvayBlue® to standard care with multiple sympathomimetic vasopressors.
Blood platelets play a major role in the inflammatory response. A dysregulation of platelets activation may be one of the contributors to tissue damage in critically ill patients with septic shock. The main objective of this study is to compare platelet activation markers levels (including plasma concentration in CD154, beta thromboglobulin, platelet factor 4, platelet microparticles, soluble CD62, RANTES, GRO-alpha and HMGB-1) at the early phase of a septic shock and a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).