View clinical trials related to Septic Shock.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of several enzymes of the gut mucosa in preventing invasion of gastrointestinal bacteria.
PiCCO has been widely used in critical care settings for several decades. Together with pulmonary artery catheter, it is regarded as the important tool for guiding fluid management in patients with shock or acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, its effects on patients' outcome remain untested. The investigators study is a pilot study that is designed to test whether the use of PiCCO will improve patients' outcome, as compared to those without PiCCO monitoring.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between a procalcitonin decrease over 72 hours and outcome in patients who have severe sepsis or septic shock.
Overweight patients are susceptible to develop acute complications when they are admitted in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Severe infection can be associated with cardiovascular failure ('shock") and is associated with 35-50% mortality. One of the key issue to cure infection is to administer antibiotics. However, under dosing antibiotic is one of the main reason that explain treatment failure. There are very few data concerning particularities of antibiotic dosing in critically ill, overweight, patients. The aim of the present study is to describe the pharmacokinetic of two main antibiotics (doripenem and piperacillin/Tazobactam) in both overweight and non overweight critically ill patients presenting a septic shock. The investigators hypothesis is that usual dose for those antibiotic may be accurate in non overweight patients but is not in overweight patients.
Patients with blood poisoning - sepsis - often receive blood transfusions in the intensive care unit. The evidence that blood transfusion leads to improved outcome is limited and the blood may be harmful to some of these patients. To bridge the gap between clinical practice and evidence, a large randomised clinical trial is needed to document the efficacy and safety of RBC transfusion in these very sick patients
Sepsis is the most severe complication of infections. Sepsis-associated Acute kidney injury (AKI) is commonly encountered in critically ill patients and independently predicts poor outcome. Unfortunately, no drug or management strategy was able to reduce incidence of AKI. To adapt the level of mean arterial pressure according to local renal hemodynamic evaluated by renal Doppler could lead to a better renal perfusion, and then less AKI.
The purpose of this study is to find out whether adult patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit with septic shock who are given hydrocortisone compared to placebo (a dummy solution), will have an improved rate of survival 90 days later. Septic shock is the result of an infection, which triggers a complex response by the body (the inflammatory response) that causes a decrease in blood pressure and subsequently one or more organ systems to fail when blood supply to these organs is reduced. This may result in poor recovery and death. About a quarter of the people who suffer septic shock that is not rapidly reversed, will die. When patients are admitted to Intensive Care with sepsis and/or septic shock they receive a number of therapies. These include fluids given through a drip, antibiotics, drugs to boost your blood pressure and other organ systems. In addition to these therapies, steroids (hydrocortisone) are sometimes administered. Whether steroids are useful or not in the treatment of severe infections has been studied for more than 50 years. Previous research has suggested that the use of low dose steroid may have shortterm benefits in improving the circulation. However, there is no agreement amongst doctors around the world about whether treatment with or without low dose steroids improves the overall recovery and survival in patients with septic shock. This study would allow doctors to make informed decisions about whether the addition of low dose steroid therapy is better for patients with septic shock in intensive care. The study will include 3800 intensive care patients who have septic shock. Each enrolled patient will be randomised to receive either Hydrocortisone 200mg or placebo daily for 7 days as a continuous intravenous infusion while in intensive care. The patient will be followed for 90 days. If the patient is discharged prior to 90 days a telephone call will be made for the followup information. At six months the patient will be contacted again for completion of a quality of life questionnaire.
We hypothesized that the increase in MAP from 65 mmHg to patients' usual level improved sublingual microcirculation.
The major goal of this project is to determine whether intravenously infused ascorbic acid is safe for use as a viable therapeutic strategy in adult humans with sepsis.
Sepsis represents the leading cause of childhood mortality worldwide. However, as distinct from adult medicine, there exists a large knowledge gap regarding long term health related quality of life (HRQL) and functional status (FS) following pediatric sepsis. This lack of sepsis outcomes data is critical because failure to identify children at risk for sepsis associated HRQL/FS deterioration may delay delivery of crucial rehabilitation medicine efforts to facilitate recovery. Moreover, failure to identify mechanisms of sepsis associated HRQL/FS deterioration may impede development of novel, effective interventions for these children. For the first time the LAPSE investigation will quantify deterioration of HRQL/FS among children surviving sepsis. We will measure the incidence, magnitude and duration of HRQL/FS alterations associated with pediatric septic shock, and examine clinical, sociodemographic, and parent/family factors potentially associated with such adverse outcomes. Because sepsis affects a heterogeneous group of children, long term morbidity associated with sepsis likely depends on premorbid health status and parent, family and home characteristics, as well as children's clinical course during sepsis critical illness. Mechanisms underlying adverse sepsis outcomes among children are poorly understood at this time. Clinically multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) has been clearly linked to sepsis mortality. To begin to understand pathophysiology underlying pediatric sepsis morbidity, this investigation will seek to identify evidence for association of HRQL/FS alterations following sepsis with intensity and duration of sepsis mediated organ dysfunction as well as with pre-existing comorbidities and parent, family, and home characteristics. The long-term goal of this research program is to timely identify children at high risk of sepsis mediated HRQL/FS deterioration and ultimately to design effective interventions to minimize such risk. The primary objectives of this investigation are to comprehensively characterize HRQL/FS trajectory and to critically examine the potential role of sepsis mediated organ dysfunction as well as pre-existing comorbidities and parent, family, and home characteristics as risk factors for the adverse outcomes. The central hypothesis is that intensity of sepsis organ dysfunction will predict magnitude of HRQL/FS deterioration. We also hypothesize that the trajectory towards baseline HRQL/FS following the sepsis event will also depend on pre-existing co-morbidities and parent, family, and home, and characteristics. Knowledge of these potential mechanisms will ultimately facilitate development of targeted interventions to maximize HRQL/FS among children surviving sepsis.