View clinical trials related to Sedation.
Filter by:In Korea, oral chloral hydrate is still widely used for pediatric procedural sedation. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of intranasal dexmedetomidine (2mcg/kg) and ketamine (3mg/kg) on the first-attempt success rate of pediatric procedural sedation. The hypothesis of this study is that the intranasal dexmedetomidine (2mcg/kg) and ketamine (3mg/kg) will improve the success rate of adequate pediatric procedural sedation (PSSS=1,2,3) within 15 minutes. This is a prospective, parallel-arm, single-blinded, multi-center, randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of intranasal dexmedetomidine (2mcg/kg) and ketamine (3mg/kg) with oral chloral hydrate (50mg/kg) in pediatric patients undergoing procedural sedation. Prior to the procedure, each patient will be randomized in the control arm (oral chloral hydrate) or study arm (intranasal dexmedetomidine and ketamine).
Sedation is a component of the care of critically ill patients who are undergoing mechanical ventilation. Dexmedetomidine induces sedation while preserving a degree of arousability among patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), and its use has resulted in a shorter time to extubation, an increased number of days free from coma or delirium, a reduced incidence of agitated delirium, prevention of delirium, and lower mortality than other agents administered in certain populations. Hypotension and bradycardia are common side effects, which is lethal for the patients with persistent or severe hemodynamic instability. The pharmacological properties of rimazolom suggest that it is an ideal sedative drug for critically ill patients, but there is no relevant clinical research to confirm it. Therefore, this study mainly discusses the efficacy and safety of remidazolam in ICU patients with mechanical ventilation, so as to provide theoretical basis for individualized sedation treatment of patients with mechanical ventilation.
This research is a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial involving mechanically ventilated children in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Indonesia. Subjects were divided into two groups: intervention vs control group. Primary and secondary outcomes will be measure pre, during, and post treatment.
The purpose of this study is to compare the sedation effect of dexmedetomidine and propofol when they are both combined with midazolam and remifentanil during awake endotracheal intubation.
This is a study to compare safety and efficacy of inhaled isoflurane delivered by the AnaConDa-S versus intravenous midazolam for sedation in mechanically ventilated children admitted to an intensive care unit.
There is exaggerated neuroendocrine stress response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation during the Induction to anesthesia-delivery (I-D) period under light anesthesia. Mechanical stimulation of laryngeal proprioceptors elicits increased secretion of cortisol and catecholamine with subsequent elevation of blood pressure from 40 to 50 % and heart rate up to 20 % during direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation
To meet the needs of both operators and patients, moderate and deep sedation has been widely used in digestive endoscopy, which is invasive and painful. With its pleasant effects, sedation has complications nevertheless. And respiratory depression is the most common one, which makes respiratory monitoring significant. SpO2 and respiratory motion are regularly monitored without satisfying timeliness or sensitivity. Capnography with current device is only able to detect either oral or nasal breathing. The present study was designed to test the effect of the investigator's modified End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide (ETCO2) monitoring device for sedation during endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration.
To compare the changes in heart function, induced after sedation with midazolam or dexmedetomidine, using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study is a randomized unmasked study, in which participant will be allocated by the envelop method into the dexmedetomidine (DEX) group or into the midazolam (MID) group.
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to shortages of intravenous sedatives due to increased ICU patient admissions and greater use of mechanical ventilation. A shortage of sedatives is as concerning as a shortage of mechanical ventilators since critically ill patients require sedation for comfort and to tolerate mechanical ventilation. Anti-adrenergic medications are increasingly recognized for their role in sedation of critically ill patients. Propranolol is a plentiful and inexpensive, non-selective beta-adrenergic blocker with good penetration of the blood-brain barrier, which can reduce agitation and arousal. The study team published a single-centre retrospective study of 64 mechanically-ventilated patients which found the initiation of propranolol was associated with an 86% reduction in propofol dose and a roughly 50% reduction in midazolam dose while maintaining the same level of sedation. Propranolol has the potential to mitigate the threat posed by worldwide sedative shortages and improve critical care management of patients who require mechanical ventilation. This study seeks to evaluate whether the addition of propranolol to a standard sedation regimen reduces the dose of sedative needed in critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation. This study is an open-label randomized controlled trial, single-blinded with 1:1 allocation. Both arms will receive sedation according to usual intensive care unit practice with a sedative agent. The intervention arm will additionally receive enteral propranolol 20-60mg q6h titrated up over 24-48h until intravenous sedative doses have fallen to a minimal level (propofol <0.5mg/kg/h or midazolam <0.5mg/h) or the maximum dose of propranolol is reached. Intravenous sedative doses will be titrated downwards in response to sympatholysis produced by the propranolol, as evidenced by a decreasing heart rate or blood pressure. The control arm will receive sedation without the addition or propranolol. The primary outcome will be the change in primary sedative dose from baseline to Day 3 of enrollment. Analysis of the primary outcome will be a difference in differences; the change in sedative dose from baseline to Day 3 in the intervention group versus the same change in the control group. The Mann-Whitney U test will be used as a nonparametric test of independent samples for this outcome.
intravenous infusion of lidocaine significantly reduce fatigue and pain and improve the patients satisfaction after sedation for colonoscopy.