Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Clinical Trial
— GSP 301-301Official title:
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of a Fixed Dose Combination GSP 301 Nasal Spray (NS) Compared With Placebo Nasal Spray and Individual Monotherapy Formulations (Comparators) in Subjects (Aged 12 Years and Older) With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR)
Verified date | August 2018 |
Source | Glenmark Specialty S.A. |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GSP 301 NS compared to placebo NS and to individual monotherapies (comparators) as well as the efficacy of these monotherapies (comparators) versus placebo NS over 14 days of study treatment
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 1180 |
Est. completion date | July 2016 |
Est. primary completion date | July 2016 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 12 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Aged 12 years and older inclusive of either sex. 2. Documented clinical history of SAR (for at least 2 years preceding the Screening Visit [Visit 1]) with exacerbations (clinical evidence of active symptoms) during the spring allergy season (tree/grass pollen) 3. A 12-hour reflective TNSS = 8 out of a possible 12 and a congestion score of = 2 for the AM assessment at the Screening Visit (Visit 1). Exclusion Criteria: 1. Pregnant or lactating women. 2. Plans to travel outside the known pollen area for the investigative site for > 24 hours during the last 7 days of run in period. 3. History of anaphylaxis and/or other severe local reaction(s) to skin testing. 4. History of positive test for HIV, Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C infection. 5. Documented evidence of acute or significant chronic sinusitis or chronic purulent postnasal drip. 6. Subjects with an active pulmonary disorder or infection. 7. Subjects with posterior subcapsular cataracts or glaucoma |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Investigational Site 3 | Austin | Texas |
United States | Investigational Site 5 | Austin | Texas |
United States | Investigational Site 8 | Austin | Texas |
United States | Investigational Site 14 | Baltimore | Maryland |
United States | Investigational Site 16 | Bellevue | Nebraska |
United States | Investigational Site 25 | Centennial | Colorado |
United States | Investigational Site 27 | Cincinnati | Ohio |
United States | Investigational Site 22 | Colorado Springs | Colorado |
United States | Investigational Site 24 | Draper | Utah |
United States | Investigational Site 10 | Jupiter | Florida |
United States | Investigational Site 1 | Kerrville | Texas |
United States | Investigational Site 11 | Louisville | Kentucky |
United States | Investigational Site 37 | Marietta | Georgia |
United States | Investigational Site 32 | Medford | Oregon |
United States | Investigational Site 30 | Miami | Florida |
United States | Investigational Site 34 | Middleburg Heights | Ohio |
United States | Investigational Site 19 | Minneapolis | Minnesota |
United States | Investigational Site 20 | Mission Viejo | California |
United States | Investigational Site 7 | New Braunfels | Texas |
United States | Investigational Site 13 | Orangeburg | South Carolina |
United States | Investigational Site 35 | Portland | Oregon |
United States | Investigational Site 18 | Raleigh | North Carolina |
United States | Investigational Site 36 | Rochester | New York |
United States | Investigational Site 21 | Saint Louis | Missouri |
United States | Investigational Site 2 | San Antonio | Texas |
United States | Investigational Site 4 | San Antonio | Texas |
United States | Investigational Site 6 | San Antonio | Texas |
United States | Investigational Site 9 | San Antonio | Texas |
United States | Investigational Site 31 | San Diego | California |
United States | Investigational Site 29 | San Jose | California |
United States | Investigational Site 12 | Skillman | New Jersey |
United States | Investigational Site 17 | Spartanburg | South Carolina |
United States | Investigational Site 15 | Stockbridge | Georgia |
United States | Investigational Site 23 | Stockbridge | Georgia |
United States | Investigational Site 28 | Waco | Texas |
United States | Investigational Site 33 | Wheaton | Maryland |
United States | Investigational Site 26 | Ypsilanti | Michigan |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Glenmark Specialty S.A. |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change in Average AM and PM Subject-reported 12-hour Reflective Total Nasal Symptoms Score (rTNSS) From Baseline to End of Treatment. | Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) was calculated as the sum of 12-hour reflective scoring of the severity of four nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, nasal itching, sneezing). Subjects responded on a 4-point severity scale with scores ranging from 0 (no signs/symptoms evident) to 3 (severe signs/symptoms that is hard to tolerate). The rTNSS was calculated as the sum of the subject-reported severity scores for nasal symptoms, and value ranged from 0 (no signs/symptoms evident) to 12 (severe signs/symptoms that is hard to tolerate). | 14 days |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Terminated |
NCT01337323 -
Prospective Observational Study of Concomitant Allergic Rhinitis Treatment Patterns Among Patients Starting on Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Spray in a Retail Pharmacy Setting
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01171664 -
Clinical Trial of STAHIST in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) Subjects
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00784732 -
A Study to Compare the Efficacy of QAV680 Against Placebo in Treating Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis in an Environmental Exposure Chamber
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00619827 -
Efficacy and Safety of Sublingual Tablets of Grass Pollen Allergen Extract
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00578929 -
Safety and Efficacy of Olopatadine HCl Nasal Spray in 6-11 Year Old Patients
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00209365 -
The Role of Pollen Starch Granules in Pollen Challenge Studies in the Fraunhofer Environmental Exposure Unit
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT00223587 -
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis and Driving Ability
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00637455 -
Single Center, Randomized, Double-Blind,Crossover Study Comparing Effects Of Single-Dose Fexofenadine HCl 180 mg, Cetirizine 10 mg, and Placebo on Cognitive Performance in Naval Flight Personnel
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00963599 -
Montelukast in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis - Fall 1999 Study (0476A-117)
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05346718 -
Threshold Concentrations for Ragweed and Birch Pollen in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06126952 -
Azelastine Allergen Chamber - Onset of Action Study
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01940146 -
Efficacy and Safety of SPARC1310 in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02245360 -
Study Immunology and Safety of 60-day Treatment of SQ Grass SLIT (Sublingual Immunotherapy)-Tablet in Adult Subjects With Grass Pollen-induced Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01230619 -
Vienna Challenge Chamber Study Using RV658 in Subjects With Allergic Rhinitis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00574210 -
PK/PD and Steady State Efficacy Study of Bilastine Compared With Placebo Given Orally in the Treatment of the Symptoms of SAR in an EEC Model (5-arm)
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00561717 -
A Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study to Determine the Efficacy and Speed of a Nasal Spray in Allergen Induced Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00420082 -
A Randomized, Double-Blind, 4-way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Bilastine in the Vienna Challenge Chamber
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00443495 -
Phase I/IIa Study on Chitin Microparticles in Subjects Suffering From Allergic Rhinitis
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00405899 -
Pilot Study of Allergy Immunotherapy and Prevention of Viral Respiratory Infections
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03097432 -
Non-interventional Study to Assess the Tolerability, the Safety Profile and the Adherence of Different Up-dosing Schemes for a Sublingual Immunotherapy Treatment
|
N/A |