View clinical trials related to SARS-CoV2 Infection.
Filter by:Emerging clinical details of the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic have illustrated that there are multiple clinical presentations and outcomes of this viral infection. People with an infection have been reported to have a spectrum of disease from severe acute respiratory distress requiring ventilation, to mild respiratory or gastrointestinal symptoms and asymptomatic presentations. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has been accompanied with a substantial increase in the number of individuals presenting with new onset type 1 diabetes [1]. Most individuals presenting with type 1 diabetes since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic are SARS-CoV-2 antibody positive. These findings suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection can cause type 1 diabetes. Investigators have identified that many individuals presenting with type 1 diabetes since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic are SARS-CoV-2 positive by swab or blood test. Researchers have also observed that T cells in patients who have had COVID recognise some of the peptides in the pancreatic islet cells, which are responsible for production of insulin. These findings suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection may be associated with new onset of type 1 diabetes. The aim of this project is to understand the host immune response to infection with SARS-CoV-2 over time in convalescent newly diagnosed patients with type 1 diabetes, including acquired immune responses, gene expression profiling in peripheral blood and to identify host genetic variants associated with disease progressions or severity. Participants will have Type 1 diabetes and will have had a diagnosis of COVID-19 (confirmed by a positive nasopharyngeal swab PCR test and/or SARS-CoV-2 antibody test) and have recovered from COVID-19. Samples will be processed and analysed to explore the molecular mechanisms by which SARS-CoV-2 infection might precipitate immune attack on insulin-producing cells resulting in autoimmune diabetes.
In this study, the investigators will examine the extent to which having suffered coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19) impacts one's sensibility to hypoxia by means of the 'Richalet test'. The aim of the study is to formulate recommendations for advice in altitude mountain medicine for patients having suffered COVID19. To determine any eventual changes in response to hypoxia, performances by participants having suffered COVID-19 and participants having stayed free of COVID-19 will be both compared intra-individually with previous performances (pre-COVID-19 pandemic) and between both groups of subjects. The investigators hypothesize that patients having suffered COVID19 might perform differently on the cardiopulmonary exercise test compared to before the illness. Based on recent research on COVID19 pathophysiology and -patient follow-up, it might be expected that COVID19 alters the response to hypoxia, thus influencing one's acclimatization capabilities at high altitude, albeit reversibly and/or temporarily. Different alterations of response to hypoxia could be observed. The virus causing COVID19, the "severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2" (SARS-CoV-2), has the potential to significantly damage the nervous system and to affect cardiorespiratory functions. If SARS-CoV-2 does, similarly to MERS and SARS, induce cardiorespiratory and neurological dysfunction, then COVID19 patients may have impaired hypoxia response after infection and perform worse on the 'Richalet test' in comparison to before the illness. Conversely, reports of high prevalence of dyspnea in patients up to 3 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection, might indicate infection-induced degenerative changes in the carotid bodies, which might lead to sensibilization of the peripheral chemoreceptors to impaired oxygenation. Possibly similar to the impact of aging and smoking on the cardiorespiratory response to hypoxia, this phenomenon of sensibilization could entail an increased hypoxic response in patients having suffered COVID-19. Accordingly, patients might perform better on the 'Richalet test' post-COVID-19 than they did before.
The Coronavirus Pediatric Serological Study's aim is to provide a better insight of children's immune response after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Serological tests were conducted on blood samples taken 3 to 5 months after the children's viral infection. The study was performed in collaboration with the Institute of Medical Immunology, were antibody levels were measured and immunoglobulin subclasses profiles were studied.
The goal of this project is to determine the efficacy of a treatment method that increase a participants sense of smell after suffering from COVID-19 related decline in smell. Participants have to be greater than 14 days from positive COVID-19 test and still have a decreased sense of smell. https://jaoa.org/article.aspx?articleid=2765119 this article is a review of literature regarding why OMT can have a positive effect on individuals suffering from COVID-19 Anosmia: Complete loss of smell Hyposmia: Decrease in smell
The first COVID-19 case in Turkey was reported on March 11, 2000. National COVID-19 mass vaccination was initiated on Jan 13, 202, with two doses of CoronaVac (R) inactivated vaccine (of Sinovac), 28 days apart. The health personnel were prioritized in the mass vaccination, given their high rates of exposure and fatality. National COVID-19 statistics have been limited to those announced in the media; data breakdown by gender, age, vaccine type and status etc. is not provided, nor is the association between non-pharmaceutical preventive measures (NPPM) and infection rates. Well-planned, longitudinal, detailed studies with laboratory support are clearly warranted. Hacettepe University is a leading institution in Turkey, with its large health sciences campus. Students of medical school (grades 4, 5, and 6) and dental school (grades 4 and 5) have been actively providing patient care in HU Hospitals, and more than 10% of medical interns had been reportedly diagnosed as COVID-19 cases prior to vaccination activities, despite (reportedly) strict non-pharmaceutical public preventive measures (NPPM) use inside/outside the occupational settings. A two-year prospective cohort study was planned for periodic evaluation of students' general health status and COVID-19 risk/exposure/infection, for timely referrals and quarantine/isolation, as needed. Anti- SARS-CoV-2-RBS antibodies will be measured periodically after vaccination, together with evaluation of potential adverse effects, presence and durability of vaccine-induced immunity. Comparison of antibody levels were planned for incident COVID-19 cases and two test-negative controls of the same gender, attending the same grade and faculty. A subcohort will be followed for aymptomatic infection risk. Institutional ethical approvals were obtained, as required. A step-wise informed consent was obtained from all participants, all tests will be done with de-personalized records, and all statistical analyses and reporting will be completed anonymously. Follow-up of participants will be ensured using participant-specific study identification numbers provided at enrollment. Study team is composed of academic personnel of 10 selected departments, nursing support is provided by the Students' Health Center in the Campus, and dental faculty are assigned for obtaining informed during the 4 subsequent study visits. The budget of the study is provided by the Hacettepe University Scientific Research Projects Office (BAP).
Despite the successful treatment of patients with moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), outcomes for patients with severe disease remain unsatisfactory. In this category of patients, the course of the disease is complicated by the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and the need for mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU). Mortality in this category of patients reaches 85%. The lack of effective treatment for COVID-19 has prompted scientists to look for new strategies to reduce the incidence and severity of COVID-19, disease progression, and mortality. Disease severity and mortality rates due to COVID-19 infection are greater in the elderly and chronically ill patients, populations at high risk for vitamin D deficiency. Vitamin D plays an important role in immune function and inflammation. A number of experimental studies have shown that stimulation of vitamin D receptors can improve the course of ARDS due to inhibition of the hyperimmune inflammatory response, regulation of the renin-angiotensin system, modulation of neutrophil activity, maintenance of the integrity of the pulmonary epithelial barrier and stimulation of epithelial repair, as well as by reducing hypercoagulation. Several studies on ICU patients have reported that low vitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations are associated with a higher risk of negative outcomes such as death, organ failure, prolonged mechanical ventilation, a higher rate of ventilation-associated pneumonia, and sepsis. While the available evidence to-date, from largely poor-quality observational studies, may be viewed as showing a trend for an association between low serum 25(OH)D levels and COVID-19 related health outcomes, this relationship was not found to be statistically significant. Calcifediol supplementation may have a protective effect on COVID-19 related ICU admissions.
In December 2019, a new pandemic emerged, the COVID-19 disease caused by a SARS-Cov-2 virus. One of the most common symptoms of COVID-19 is mainly respiratory failure and patients requires assistance by mechanical ventilation. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a risk of this assistance. Since the beginning of the pandemic, Standard of care have evolved with new data. The prevalence of these VAPs seems significantly higher in the population of patients with ARDS COVID-19 (40-50%) and their ecology seems to have evolved over time, particularly in terms of bacterial resistance. Investigators want to describe and compare this evolution of bacterial and fungal ecology as well as identify potential risk factors that may be associated with these changes in ecology during different waves.
People with sarcoidosis, particularly those with significant lung and/or cardiac involvement, who become infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) are likely at increased risk of complications or death from COVID-19. While SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are highly efficacious in preventing COVID-19 in the general population, whether vaccination provides similar protection in people with sarcoidosis is unknown. The investigators hypothesize that people with sarcoidosis develop less robust antibody and cell-mediated immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination than healthy individuals, both as a consequence of the disease itself and due to treatment with immunosuppressive medications. This hypothesis will be examined by determining levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody (Specific Aim 1) and measuring SARS-CoV-2-specific activation of peripheral blood T cells (Specific Aim 2) following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in individuals with sarcoidosis treated and not treated with immunosuppressive medications, in comparison to age- and sex-matched healthy controls. For Specific Aim 1, a second-generation anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG assay calibrated against an independent virus neutralization assay will be utilized. The results of this investigation will address a critical gap in the understanding of vaccine responses in people with sarcoidosis. In addition, the study will contribute knowledge needed to inform clinicians' recommendations to sarcoidosis patients regarding risk of infection after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, and will help lay the basis for future trials to evaluate the possible benefit of vaccine boosters in individuals with poor immune responses to initial vaccination.
the SARS-CoV2 pandemic has led to a major reorganization of the French Hematology and stem cell transplant departments since march 2020. Since the allogeneic stem cell transplant cannot be delayed especially when patients with hematological malignancies are in a fragile remission, risking relapse at any time, the necessity to maintain safe hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donations from match unrelated or family donors appears rapidly mandatory during the pandemic period. To increase the safety of voluntary donations, a SARS-CoV2 Polymerase Chain Reaction test has been recommended to donors by regulatory agencies. However, due to the lack of homogeneity of care at European level, some countries do not require SARS-CoV-2 testing in asymptomatic donors. In this case, the test is performed on additional EDTA tube accompanying the graft on arrival or in the case of a missing tube (not collected or forgotten), on few milliliters of the HSC graft. This circuit had the consequence of forcing the clinicians to wait for the test result before starting the patient's conditioning regimen. The graft being already collected and received at the transplant center, and the conditioning regimen lasting on an average of 5 days, this resulted in its conservation during this minimum period and therefore its freezing by the associated cell therapy unit. However, this practice has so far been exceptional regarding allogeneic transplants, which are primarily freshly infused to ensure to the recipient the highest viability and functionality of stem cells. Since the entire freezing-thawing and washing process may impact cell viability and delay the patient's aplastic recovery, this study aimed to analyze the results of one year of allogeneic transplants infused after freezing in terms of graft quality after thawing and clinical consequences.
Since the onset of COVID-19, recommendations suggest the use of neuraxial anesthesia, if possible, over general anesthesia for cesarian section to avoid the risks of aerosolization associated with tracheal intubation and extubation. But the safety of performing spinal anesthesia is unclear especially for post spinal hypotension, during the presence of active infection with COVID-19. Since at the beginning of the pandemic a few studies reported significant hypotension during epidural anesthesia in COVID-19 pregnant women, there was a controversial discussion about the safety of regional anesthesia was started. In this study we aimed to find if spinal anesthesia is safely recommended anesthesia type for COVID-19 obstetric patients. 249 patients with PCR confirmed COVID-19 for cesarean section undergoing spinal anesthesia in Ankara City Hospital, Ankara assessed in this retrospective study to find if the hypotension is the risk factor for the COVID-19 patients.