Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03670927
Other study ID # C17-03
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date April 25, 2019
Est. completion date April 25, 2022

Study information

Verified date August 2021
Source Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
Contact Aude Lacourt, PhD
Phone +3357571623
Email aude.lacourt@inserm.fr
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Introduction: Sarcomas are rare tumors of connective tissue. The exact overall incidence of sarcomas is unknown due to diagnostic difficulties and the various histological subtypes (over 80 subtypes). However, the apparent increasing incidence of sarcomas suggests environmental causes such as pesticides. Except for some specific factors (i.e. ionizing radiation, vinyl chloride, dioxin, and genetic predispositions) the scientific knowledge on the aetiology of sarcomas is sparse and inconsistent. France is a particularly appropriate country to set up a study investigating the causes of sarcoma occurrence due to the French organization in treatment and care of sarcoma patients, which is highly structured and revolved around national expert networks. The main objective of the ETIOSARC project is to study the role of lifestyle, environmental and occupational factors in the occurrence of sarcomas among adults from a multicentric population-based case-control study. Methods and analysis: Cases will be all incident cases (older than 18 years old) identified in 15 districts of France covered by a cancer registry and/or a reference center in sarcoma's patient care over a three-year period with an inclusion start date ranging from the 1st October 2018 to the 1st January 2020 and histologically confirmed by a second review of the diagnosis. Two controls will be individually-matched by sex, age (5-years group), and districts of residence and randomly selected from electoral list. A standardized questionnaire will be administered by a trained interviewer in order to gather information about occupational and residential history, demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and lifestyle factors. At the end of the interview, a saliva sample will be systematically proposed. This study will permit to validate or not already suspected risk factors for sarcomas such as phenoxyherbicides, chlorophenol and to generate new hypothesis to increase our understanding about the genetic and environmental contributions in the carcinogenicity process.


Description:

The main objective of the ETIOSARC study is to assess the role of lifestyle, environmental and occupational factors in the occurrence of sarcomas among adults from a multicenter population-based case-control study. Specific objectives are: - To identify environmental risk factors for sarcomas as a whole and for the most frequent subtypes; - To investigate the interactions between gene polymorphisms and environmental exposures in sarcoma susceptibility; - To assess whether some specific genetic characteristics of sarcoma' tumors are associated with environmental exposures; We will also explore the feasibility of classifying sarcomas by genetics types (simple vs complex genomic profile) as part of the objective of identifying environmental risk factors. Study design The ETIOSARC study is a prospective multicenter population-based case-control study. This study is restricted to French geographical areas (further called districts) that meet at least one of these four criteria: - Criteria 1: Districts covered by both a general cancer registry and a French Sarcoma Group (GSF-GETO) expert center from either the network of reference for soft-tissue sarcoma pathology (RRePS), the network of reference for bone sarcoma pathology (ResOs) or the clinical sarcoma network (NetSarc); - Criteria 2: Districts including a coordinator center of any of the RRePS / NetSarc networks; - Criteria 3: Districts covered by a general cancer registry that is expected to register more than 50 cases per year; - Criteria 4: Districts adjacent to districts meeting criteria 1 and covered by a general cancer registry. In total, 15 districts meet one of the four criteria, which represent approximatively 24% of the French population (2015 estimations from the national institute of statistics and economic studies, Insee). Nine districts meet criteria 1 (Gironde, Hérault, Haute-Vienne, Loire Atlantique, Calvados, Nord, Bas-Rhin and Doubs, Poitou-Charentes), two districts meet criteria 2 (Rhône and Val-de-Marne); two districts meet criteria 3 (Isère and Haut-Rhin) et two districts meet criteria 4 (Manche, Vendée). Study population Cases recruitment modalities Patients will be recruited by specifically trained clinical research associate (CRA). In districts where a general cancer registry is active, the process of identifying incident sarcoma patients is well defined, which warrants the efficiency and exhaustiveness of the recruitment. However, poor survival for some cancer cases will not allow to rely on routine inclusion procedure and the registries will implement a rapid case ascertainment procedure to minimize the delay between diagnosis and enrollment and interview. Cases will be identified from pathology laboratories and multidisciplinary sarcoma tumor board (including sarcoma, gynecological, digestive, skin and bone tumor board). CRA will regularly contact laboratories and hospitals (within a three months window) to identify newly diagnosed sarcoma cases and to collect associated reports. The CRA will retrieve the clinical file in order to check inclusion and non inclusion criteria and to collect names and addresses of eligible patients and their physicians. Then, the CRA will contact the case's physicians in order to gather their clinical advice to include their patients in the study. In case of agreement, the CRA will contact the patients and ask them to participate. In case of oral agreement, he/she will arrange an interview to collect written consent and administer detailed questionnaire. In Rhône and Val de Marne where no general cancer registry exists, the process of identifying incident sarcoma patients will largely rely on the existence of a RRePS/ResOS/NetSarc coordination center to facilitate the identification of new cases. Regardless of the district, the diagnosis of all included cases will be systematically ascertained by an expert pathologist within the RRePS and ResOs networks following a standard procedure. On a regular basis (at least once a month), the list of incident cases included in the RRePS/ResOS/NetSarc networks will be extracted from the shared databases. The list of cases identified by registries will be merged with the list of cases included in the RRePS/ResOS/NetSarc networks by the pathology sample reference number in order to collect diagnosis confirmation and to identify new but missed incident cases. Controls selection The selection of controls and the recruitment of cases will take place simultaneously. Every time a case will be diagnosed and identified, two controls will be randomly selected at that time from the electoral rolls of the same district as the case district of residence. For each case, a list of 20 potential controls with the same age (within a 5-year age group) and sex as the cases will be constituted in order to account for potential refusal. Calls to contact potential controls will be centralized and will be made by an investigator specifically trained to better understand the objectives of the study. First, this investigator will try to retrieve the phone number of the first potential control on the list and will contact him/her in order to gather his/her agreement to participate in this study. After five calls made at different schedules (e.g. in the evening on weekdays), if the potential control couldn't be reached, the investigator will send an information letter containing a reply coupon indicating phone number and schedule at which the person could be reach. If the reply coupon is not returned, or after 10 calls made at the phone number and the schedule indicated on the reply coupon, the first potential control will be considered as unreachable and then, the same procedure will be applied for the second potential controls on the list and so on until two controls per case agreed to participate to the study. For each control agreeing to participate, an appointment will be made to collect written consent and to administer detailed questionnaire by a CRA. All participants will give their informed written consent to participation, in line with French ethical guidelines. Data collection Data will be collected from self-questionnaire supplemented by a specific questionnaire. The self-questionnaire will permit to gather the complete occupational history (for each job held for at least 6 months) and residential history (for each place occupied for at least 6 months). During a face-to-face interview, the trained interviewer will check (complete if necessary) and supplement the self-administered questionnaire by a specific questionnaire with questions about demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, occupations of spouse and parents, leisure-time activities, reproduction, medical history, family history of cancer, diet, lifestyle factors such as tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption. The specific questionnaire will also collect additional occupational and residential information such as work tasks, work places, materials handled for each job held for at least 6 months and description of the environment of each residence places. At the end of the interview, subjects (both cases and controls) will be invited to provide a saliva sample in order to obtain germline DNA. In case of refusal to participate and if the subject agreed, data on demographic and socioeconomic characteristics will be collected in order to assess the potential selection bias that might occur due to the specific profile of non-respondent subjects. Biological sampling and storage Each participant will be asked to provide a salivary sample in order to obtain germline DNA. Salivary samples will be collected by the subjects themselves under instructions from the CRA, using DNA Genotek Oragene 575 collection kit. After collection, samples will be sent at the Biological Resources Center of the Bordeaux hospital university center "Bordeaux Biothèque Santé" for storage. Determination of the sample size Since our definition of environmental exposures is very broad, the sample size calculation has been based on various scenarios of exposure prevalence, from 5% (relevant for domestic, environmental but also some occupational exposures such as farmer in the general population) to 20% (relevant for some occupational exposures such as fibers). For a total sample size of 2000 cases and a 1:2 individually-matched design, considering a statistical power of 80% at a significance level of 5%, the minimum detectable odds ratio will be 1.39 and 1.21 under a exposure prevalence of 5% and 20%, respectively. Considering sub-types analyses, the four main histological types are GIST, liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma and unclassified sarcoma, which account for 18%, 15%, 11% and 16% of sarcomas, respectively. Considering a sample size of 300 cases, the minimum detectable odds ratio will be 2.21 and 1.61 under an exposure prevalence of 5% and 20%, respectively. Typically in environmental epidemiology, the relative increases in disease risks due to environmental exposures are usually low around 1.5, thus, it is essential to recruit a minimum of 2000 cases in order to be able to perform sub-type analyses. Statistical analysis Relationship between case/control status and each exposure variable and 95% confidence intervals will be individually estimated using conditional logistic regression models. If necessary, a multilevel logistic model will be implemented in order to take into account the data variability due to the multicenter design and the various CRA that will administer the questionnaires. Stratified histological sub-types analyses are also planned. Moreover, since sarcomas may be classified into four groups on a molecular basis (i.e. sarcomas with recurrent translocation, sarcomas with specific activating or inactivating mutations, sarcomas with MDM2 amplifications, and sarcomas with a complex genomic profile), the feasibility of classifying sarcomas by genetic types instead of by histological subtypes for the objective of identifying environmental risk factors will be explore. The underlying hypothesis is that the aetiology among these four molecular groups may be homogeneous. Methods for coordinating the project and for quality control This study is organized around three different centers or committees: a national coordination center, a steering committee, and local centers. The national coordination center will be in charge of running routine operations, assisting participating local centers, guaranteeing the quality of the data collection, centralizing data, supervising the data coding and exposure assessment. The steering committee's principal role will be to establish research priorities based on the availability of the data and the current scientific knowledge. Local centers will be in charge of determining identification sources of cases in their districts and of collecting data. They will also transmit the collected data to the national coordination center. Standardized procedures are written in a procedure manual to guarantee the quality of the collected data. Besides, a completion guide of the standardized questionnaire has been developed to assist CRA during interviews. A data manager will ensure that the study is conducted in compliance with the protocol. On a regular basis and as frequently as necessary, he/she will assess the quality of the collected data using several indicators: the average time spent by the CRA at the subject's home, the degree of completeness of the questionnaires by CRA, the ratio of included cases to expected cases, the average elapsed time between the identification of a case and the interview, the average elapsed time between case and control interviews, etc. All collected data will be centralized in a single location, the University of Bordeaux (CREDIM, centre de Recherche et de Développement en Informatique Médicale).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 6462
Est. completion date April 25, 2022
Est. primary completion date April 25, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Cases - Patients diagnosed in the previous 6 months from identification with a primary and histologically confirmed malignant sarcoma including soft-tissue, visceral and bone sarcomas as defined by the WHO classification of bones and soft tissue sarcoma, fourth edition, 2013; - Diagnosed over a three-year period with an inclusion start date ranging from the 1st October 2018 to the 1st January 2020; - Living in the 15 districts participating to the study at the time of diagnosis - French nationality (due to control selection within electoral lists); - At least 18 years old at diagnosis; - Agreed to participate to the study with a signed informed consent; - Controls - Subjects registered within the electoral rolls; - At least 18 years old at interview; - Living in the 15 districts participating to the study at the time of interview; - Agreed to participate to the study with a signed informed consent; Exclusion Criteria: - Cases - Patients with a known genetic predisposition to sarcoma such as Li-Fraumeni syndrome, Retinoblastoma syndrome, neurofibromatosis; - Kaposi's' sarcoma; - Protected adults' patients (aged of at least 18 years old) under guardianship by court order. - Controls - Subject previously diagnosed with a primary and histologically confirmed malignant sarcoma including soft-tissue, visceral and bone sarcomas as defined by the WHO classification of bones and soft tissue sarcoma, fourth edition, 2013; - Protected adults' patients (aged of at least 18 years old) under guardianship by court order.

Study Design


Intervention

Other:
Environmental, occupational and lifestyle-related exposures
A standardized questionnaire will be administered by a trained interviewer in order to gather information about occupational and residential history, demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and lifestyle factors. At the end of the interview, a saliva sample will be systematically proposed

Locations

Country Name City State
France CHRU Besançon
France Institut Bergonié Bordeaux
France Centre François Baclesse Caen
France Centre Oscar Lambret Lille
France CHU Dupuytren Limoges
France Centre Léon Bérard Lyon
France Institut régional du Cancer Montpellier Montpellier
France CHU Nantes
France CHRU Strasbourg
France Institut Gustave Roussy Villejuif

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France

Country where clinical trial is conducted

France, 

References & Publications (34)

Alexandrov LB, Stratton MR. Mutational signatures: the patterns of somatic mutations hidden in cancer genomes. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2014 Feb;24:52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2013.11.014. Epub 2013 Dec 29. Review. — View Citation

Bisanti L, Maggini M, Raschetti R, Alegiani SS, Ippolito FM, Caffari B, Segnan N, Ponti A. Cancer mortality in ethylene oxide workers. Br J Ind Med. 1993 Apr;50(4):317-24. — View Citation

Blair A, Zahm SH. Agricultural exposures and cancer. Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Nov;103 Suppl 8:205-8. Review. — View Citation

Briggs NC, Levine RS, Hall HI, Cosby O, Brann EA, Hennekens CH. Occupational risk factors for selected cancers among African American and White men in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2003 Oct;93(10):1748-52. — View Citation

Burningham Z, Hashibe M, Spector L, Schiffman JD. The epidemiology of sarcoma. Clin Sarcoma Res. 2012 Oct 4;2(1):14. doi: 10.1186/2045-3329-2-14. — View Citation

Downs TD, Crane MM, Kim KW. Mortality among workers at a butadiene facility. Am J Ind Med. 1987;12(3):311-29. — View Citation

Ducimetière F, Lurkin A, Ranchère-Vince D, Decouvelaere AV, Isaac S, Claret-Tournier C, Suignard Y, Salameire D, Cellier D, Alberti L, Bringuier PP, Blay JY, Ray-Coquard I. [Incidence rate, epidemiology of sarcoma and molecular biology. Preliminary results from EMS study in the Rhône-Alpes region]. Bull Cancer. 2010 Jun;97(6):629-41. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2010.1117. Review. French. — View Citation

Ducimetière F, Lurkin A, Ranchère-Vince D, Decouvelaere AV, Péoc'h M, Istier L, Chalabreysse P, Muller C, Alberti L, Bringuier PP, Scoazec JY, Schott AM, Bergeron C, Cellier D, Blay JY, Ray-Coquard I. Incidence of sarcoma histotypes and molecular subtypes in a prospective epidemiological study with central pathology review and molecular testing. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e20294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020294. Epub 2011 Aug 3. — View Citation

Eriksson M, Hardell L, Adami HO. Exposure to dioxins as a risk factor for soft tissue sarcoma: a population-based case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990 Mar 21;82(6):486-90. — View Citation

Grimalt JO, Sunyer J, Moreno V, Amaral OC, Sala M, Rosell A, Anto JM, Albaiges J. Risk excess of soft-tissue sarcoma and thyroid cancer in a community exposed to airborne organochlorinated compound mixtures with a high hexachlorobenzene content. Int J Cancer. 1994 Jan 15;56(2):200-3. — View Citation

Guillou L, Aurias A. Soft tissue sarcomas with complex genomic profiles. Virchows Arch. 2010 Feb;456(2):201-17. doi: 10.1007/s00428-009-0853-4. Review. — View Citation

Hardell L, Eriksson M. The association between soft tissue sarcomas and exposure to phenoxyacetic acids. A new case-referent study. Cancer. 1988 Aug 1;62(3):652-6. — View Citation

Hoar SK, Blair A, Holmes FF, Boysen CD, Robel RJ, Hoover R, Fraumeni JF Jr. Agricultural herbicide use and risk of lymphoma and soft-tissue sarcoma. JAMA. 1986 Sep 5;256(9):1141-7. Erratum in: JAMA 1986 Dec 26;256(24):3351. — View Citation

Hoar Zahm S, Blair A, Holmes FF, Boysen CD, Robel RJ. A case-referent study of soft-tissue sarcoma and Hodgkin's disease. Farming and insecticide use. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1988 Aug;14(4):224-30. — View Citation

Hoppin JA, Tolbert PE, Flanders WD, Zhang RH, Daniels DS, Ragsdale BD, Brann EA. Occupational risk factors for sarcoma subtypes. Epidemiology. 1999 May;10(3):300-6. — View Citation

Hossain A, McDuffie HH, Bickis MG, Pahwa P; Cross Canada Study of Pesticides and Health Researchers. Case-control study on occupational risk factors for soft-tissue sarcoma. J Occup Environ Med. 2007 Dec;49(12):1386-93. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318157d2f2. — View Citation

Howe HL, Wingo PA, Thun MJ, Ries LA, Rosenberg HM, Feigal EG, Edwards BK. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer (1973 through 1998), featuring cancers with recent increasing trends. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Jun 6;93(11):824-42. — View Citation

IARC (2012). IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Vol. 100. A review of human carcinogens, part D: radiation. Lyon, IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer)

IARC (2012). IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Vol. 100. A review of human carcinogens, part F: chemical agents and related occupations. Lyon, IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer)

Karanian M, Coindre JM. [Fourth edition of WHO classification tumours of soft tissue]. Ann Pathol. 2015 Jan;35(1):71-85. doi: 10.1016/j.annpat.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Dec 17. French. — View Citation

Kogevinas M, Kauppinen T, Winkelmann R, Becher H, Bertazzi PA, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Coggon D, Green L, Johnson E, Littorin M, et al. Soft tissue sarcoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in workers exposed to phenoxy herbicides, chlorophenols, and dioxins: two nested case-control studies. Epidemiology. 1995 Jul;6(4):396-402. — View Citation

Landrigan PJ. Critical assessment of epidemiologic studies on the human carcinogenicity of 1,3-butadiene. Environ Health Perspect. 1990 Jun;86:143-7. Review. — View Citation

Lurkin A, Ducimetière F, Vince DR, Decouvelaere AV, Cellier D, Gilly FN, Salameire D, Biron P, de Laroche G, Blay JY, Ray-Coquard I. Epidemiological evaluation of concordance between initial diagnosis and central pathology review in a comprehensive and prospective series of sarcoma patients in the Rhone-Alpes region. BMC Cancer. 2010 Apr 19;10:150. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-150. — View Citation

Mathoulin-Pélissier S, Chevreau C, Bellera C, Bauvin E, Savès M, Grosclaude P, Albert S, Goddard J, Le Guellec S, Delannes M, Bui BN, Mendiboure J, Stoeckle E, Coindre JM, Kantor G, Kind M, Cowppli-Bony A, Hoppe S, Italiano A. Adherence to consensus-based diagnosis and treatment guidelines in adult soft-tissue sarcoma patients: a French prospective population-based study. Ann Oncol. 2014 Jan;25(1):225-31. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt407. Epub 2013 Nov 26. — View Citation

Merletti F, Richiardi L, Bertoni F, Ahrens W, Buemi A, Costa-Santos C, Eriksson M, Guénel P, Kaerlev L, Jöckel KH, Llopis-Gonzalez A, Merler E, Miranda A, Morales-Suárez-Varela MM, Olsson H, Fletcher T, Olsen J. Occupational factors and risk of adult bone sarcomas: a multicentric case-control study in Europe. Int J Cancer. 2006 Feb 1;118(3):721-7. — View Citation

Pahwa P, McDuffie HH, Dosman JA, Robson D, McLaughlin JR, Spinelli JJ, Fincham S. Exposure to animals and selected risk factors among Canadian farm residents with Hodgkin's disease, multiple myeloma, or soft tissue sarcoma. J Occup Environ Med. 2003 Aug;45(8):857-68. — View Citation

Ray-Coquard I, Montesco MC, Coindre JM, Dei Tos AP, Lurkin A, Ranchère-Vince D, Vecchiato A, Decouvelaere AV, Mathoulin-Pélissier S, Albert S, Cousin P, Cellier D, Toffolatti L, Rossi CR, Blay JY. Sarcoma: concordance between initial diagnosis and centralized expert review in a population-based study within three European regions. Ann Oncol. 2012 Sep;23(9):2442-2449. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr610. Epub 2012 Feb 13. — View Citation

Sathiakumar N, Delzell E, Austin H, Cole P. A follow-up study of agricultural chemical production workers. Am J Ind Med. 1992;21(3):321-30. — View Citation

Savage SA, Mirabello L, Wang Z, Gastier-Foster JM, Gorlick R, Khanna C, Flanagan AM, Tirabosco R, Andrulis IL, Wunder JS, Gokgoz N, Patiño-Garcia A, Sierrasesúmaga L, Lecanda F, Kurucu N, Ilhan IE, Sari N, Serra M, Hattinger C, Picci P, Spector LG, Barkauskas DA, Marina N, de Toledo SR, Petrilli AS, Amary MF, Halai D, Thomas DM, Douglass C, Meltzer PS, Jacobs K, Chung CC, Berndt SI, Purdue MP, Caporaso NE, Tucker M, Rothman N, Landi MT, Silverman DT, Kraft P, Hunter DJ, Malats N, Kogevinas M, Wacholder S, Troisi R, Helman L, Fraumeni JF Jr, Yeager M, Hoover RN, Chanock SJ. Genome-wide association study identifies two susceptibility loci for osteosarcoma. Nat Genet. 2013 Jul;45(7):799-803. doi: 10.1038/ng.2645. Epub 2013 Jun 2. — View Citation

Smith JG, Christophers AJ. Phenoxy herbicides and chlorophenols: a case control study on soft tissue sarcoma and malignant lymphoma. Br J Cancer. 1992 Mar;65(3):442-8. — View Citation

Toro JR, Travis LB, Wu HJ, Zhu K, Fletcher CD, Devesa SS. Incidence patterns of soft tissue sarcomas, regardless of primary site, in the surveillance, epidemiology and end results program, 1978-2001: An analysis of 26,758 cases. Int J Cancer. 2006 Dec 15;119(12):2922-30. — View Citation

Wibmer C, Leithner A, Zielonke N, Sperl M, Windhager R. Increasing incidence rates of soft tissue sarcomas? A population-based epidemiologic study and literature review. Ann Oncol. 2010 May;21(5):1106-11. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp415. Epub 2009 Oct 25. Review. — View Citation

Wingren G, Fredrikson M, Brage HN, Nordenskjöld B, Axelson O. Soft tissue sarcoma and occupational exposures. Cancer. 1990 Aug 15;66(4):806-11. — View Citation

Woods JS, Polissar L, Severson RK, Heuser LS, Kulander BG. Soft tissue sarcoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in relation to phenoxyherbicide and chlorinated phenol exposure in western Washington. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1987 May;78(5):899-910. — View Citation

* Note: There are 34 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Odds ratios measuring the association between environmental exposures under study (environmental, occupational and lifestyle exposures) and sarcoma occurence The relationship between case/control status and each exposure variable will be estimated by odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals using conditional logistic regression models. 1 year
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04986748 - Using QPOP to Predict Treatment for Sarcomas and Melanomas
Recruiting NCT04457258 - 68Ga-FAPi-46 PET/CT Scan in Imaging Patients With Sarcoma Early Phase 1
Completed NCT04474678 - Quality Improvement Project - "My Logbook! - I Know my Way Around!"; ("Mein Logbuch - Ich Kenne Mich Aus!") N/A
Recruiting NCT05415098 - Study of Safety, Pharmacokinetic and Efficacy of APG-5918 in Advanced Solid Tumors or Lymphomas Phase 1
Recruiting NCT04535713 - GALLANT: Metronomic Gemcitabine, Doxorubicin, Docetaxel and Nivolumab for Advanced Sarcoma Phase 2
Completed NCT03521531 - Burden and Medical Care of Sarcoma in Germany
Completed NCT02496520 - Dendritic Cell-based Immunotherapy for Advanced Solid Tumours of Children and Young Adults Phase 1/Phase 2
Terminated NCT02054104 - Adjuvant Tumor Lysate Vaccine and Iscomatrix With or Without Metronomic Oral Cyclophosphamide and Celecoxib in Patients With Malignancies Involving Lungs, Esophagus, Pleura, or Mediastinum Phase 1/Phase 2
Terminated NCT00788125 - Dasatinib, Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, and Etoposide in Treating Young Patients With Metastatic or Recurrent Malignant Solid Tumors Phase 1/Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT04577014 - Retifanlimab (Anti-PD-1 Antibody) With Gemcitabine and Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma Phase 1/Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT04383210 - Study of Seribantumab in Adult Patients With NRG1 Gene Fusion Positive Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 2
Completed NCT04052334 - Lymphodepletion Plus Adoptive Cell Therapy With High Dose IL-2 in Adolescent and Young Adult Patients With Soft Tissue Sarcoma Phase 1
Completed NCT01593748 - A Phase II Trial Comparing Gemcitabine and Pazopanib Versus Gemcitabine and Docetaxel for Patients With Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma Phase 2
Completed NCT00199849 - NY-ESO-1 Plasmid DNA (pPJV7611) Cancer Vaccine Phase 1
Recruiting NCT04367779 - Research of Biomarkers of Response to Proton Beam Therapy in Pediatric and Adult Patients.
Completed NCT01879085 - Study of Vorinostat in Combination With Gemcitabine and Docetaxel in Advanced Sarcoma Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04553692 - Phase 1a/1b Study of Aplitabart (IGM-8444) Alone or in Combination in Participants With Relapsed, Refractory, or Newly Diagnosed Cancers Phase 1
Completed NCT01209598 - PD0332991 (Palbociclib) in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Liposarcoma Phase 2
Completed NCT04553471 - Palliative Lattice Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Patients With Sarcoma, Thoracic, Abdominal, and Pelvic Cancers N/A
Withdrawn NCT04906876 - A Phase 2 Study of 9-ING-41Combined With Chemotherapy in Adolescents and Adults With Advanced Sarcomas Phase 2