Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy Clinical Trial
Official title:
Allowing Pain Versus Avoiding Pain During Shoulder Exercises: Does Pain Matter in the Effectiveness of an Exercise Program in Patients With Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy?
Overuse shoulder injuries such as rotator cuff (RC) tendinopathy are common with a prevalence estimated to be 14% in the general population of which 23% of the working population with shoulder problems are sick listed. RC tendinopathy is a tendon-related pain in the proximal lateral aspect of the upper arm with weakness, especially during active elevation and external rotation, and painful active range of motion. The prevalence of RC tendinopathy is highest in the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon. Exercise therapy is regarded as an effective intervention for symptomatic RC tendinopathy for reducing pain and disability and improving function. However, the prescription is diverse and the effectiveness of specific characteristics of exercise programs is unknown. Many contextual factors and prescription parameters, such as external resistance, training intensity and frequency, home versus supervised exercises, duration of the program, etc. have been described. Some of these prescription parameters have been extensively studied, with some conflicting results. Although some level of resistance seems to matter, as well as number of sets and repetitions, the 'optimal' level and volume are unclear. Inducing or allowing pain based on tendon loading during exercises is todays consensus in the treatment of patellar and achilles tendinopathy using a pain-monitoring model. Although a number of shoulder studies report that pain either should be avoided or allowed, not one study ever examined the influence of pain allowance versus pain avoidance during a shoulder exercise program on patient outcome in terms of pain, physical function and disability. The purpose of this project is to examine the effect of allowing pain versus avoiding pain based on tendon loading during an exercise regimen for patients with symptomatic rotator cuff (RC) tendinopathy. This will be accomplished in a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial, comparing the effectiveness on patient reported and objective outcomes of a "pain allowing" and "pain avoiding" exercise program, performed for 26 weeks. Our hypothesis is that allowing pain based on tendon loading during exercises would result in a better outcome in pain and function measured on SPADI (the primary outcome) compared to avoiding pain in patients with RC tendinopathy.
Aim The purpose of this project is to examine the effect of allowing pain versus avoiding pain based on tendon loading during an exercise regimen for patients with symptomatic rotator cuff (RC) tendinopathy. This will be accomplished in a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial, comparing the effectiveness on patient reported and objective outcomes of a "pain allowing" and "pain avoiding" exercise program, performed for 26 weeks. Background Shoulder disorders are the third most common musculoskeletal disorder with a life-time prevalence in the general population of 30%. Shoulder disorders are often persistent and recurrent, with 54% of the patients reporting on-going symptoms after 3 years. RC tendinopathy is regarded as a common source of shoulder pain with prevalence estimated to be as high as 14% in the general working-age population. About 23% of the working population with shoulder problems are sick-listed, with a potential individual productivity loss. RC tendinopathy is a tendon-related pain in the proximal lateral aspect of the upper arm with weakness, especially during active elevation and external rotation, and painful active range of motion. The pathoanatomic understanding is extended by classifying tissue irritability and specific impairments. Tissue irritability is meant to guide intensity of treatment, and identifying specific impairments guides specific tactics used for intervention. The prevalence of RC tendinopathy is highest in the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon. Exercise therapy is widely regarded as an effective intervention for symptomatic RC tendinopathy for reducing pain and disability and improving function. It is well known that tendon collagen regains formation and tensile strength faster than unstressed collagen, and that it can take 12 month or longer before it reaches full maturity and strength. However, the prescription is diverse and the effectiveness of specific characteristics of exercise programs is unknown. Many contextual factors and prescription parameters, such as external resistance, training intensity and frequency, home versus supervised exercises, duration of the program, etc. have been described and are summarized in a systematic review. Some of these prescription parameters have been extensively studied, with some conflicting results. Although some level of resistance seems to matter, as well as a number of sets and repetitions, the 'optimal' level and volume are unclear. The existing studies offer some preliminary guidance in relation to the development and application of loading in exercise programs for RC tendinopathy, however there is a gap in literature with respect to allowing or avoiding pain during shoulder exercises. Inducing or allowing pain based on tendon loading during exercises is todays consensus in the treatment of patellar and achilles tendinopathy using a pain-monitoring model. Although a number of shoulder studies report that pain either should be avoided or allowed, not one study ever examined the influence of pain allowance versus pain avoidance during a shoulder exercise program on patient outcome in terms of pain, physical function and disability. Hypothesis Allowing pain based on tendon loading during exercises would result in a better outcome in pain and function measured on SPADI (the primary outcome) compared to avoiding pain in patients with RC tendinopathy. ;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05561452 -
The Efficacy of PRP Injection in the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Syndrome
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03013192 -
Three Month Automated Messaging Intervention
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02881021 -
Effects of Kinesiotaping on Symptoms, Functional Limitations, and Underlying Deficits of Patients With Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05969652 -
Comparison of the Effectiveness Heavy Slow Resistance and Eccentric Training in Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05320419 -
The Effect of Amniotic Membrane Injection as An Addition to Physical Therapy in Patients With Rotator Cuff Tear
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03454321 -
IS'ECHO : Impact of Bursitis on the Efficacy of Subacromial Steroid Injection in Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
|
||
Completed |
NCT06031857 -
Comparison of Kinesio Tape and Dry Needling for the Management of Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Randomized Control Trial
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03032432 -
A Dynamic Elastic Garment (DEG) in Patients With Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05207384 -
Comparison of Subacromial Ozone (O2-O3) and Corticosteroid Injections in the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04766905 -
Mini Lateral Shoulder Approach
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03104218 -
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Enhance Rehabilitation in Individuals With Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01915979 -
Effect of Plasma Rich in Growth Factors in Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02982460 -
Effects of Isoinertial Training on Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05758415 -
Study of Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab in Participants With Moderate-severe Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05722522 -
Study of Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab in Participants With Moderate-severe Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01423682 -
The Influence of Eccentric Training on the Volume and Vascularisation of the Rotator Cuff in Patients With Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy and Healthy Subjects
|
N/A |