Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05988541
Other study ID # Tikk2023
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date October 3, 2023
Est. completion date September 2025

Study information

Verified date November 2023
Source Tartu University Hospital
Contact Tiina Tikk, MD
Phone 55929399
Email tiinatikk@gmail.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The study gives an overview of surgically treated rotator cuff injury patients in Tartu University Hospital Sports Traumatology Centre during 2013-2019 and evaluates the integrity of rotator cuff at minimum 5 years after atraumatic rotator cuff tendon repair. First stage of the study describes the study population, etiology of the injury (traumatic/atraumatic) and aims to answer the question whether the arthroscopic findings are in line with the preoperative imaging studies or not. Second stage of the study focuses on atraumatic tendon tears assessing structural integrity of the tendons 5 years after repair using ultrasound imaging. The main question is - does the findings correlate with clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Participants of the second phase of the study will be asked for an appointment to have their shoulders examined with ultrasonography and clinical outcomes are measured using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score, The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and The Constant-Murley score (CMS).


Description:

High numbers of re-tear after rotator cuff surgery have been shown, though not always influencing patient satisfaction. If there is an atraumatic tendon tear, the risk of having a contralateral rotator cuff tendon tear is high. The aim is to study surgically treated rotator cuff injury patients 5 years after repair to evaluate tendon integrity on ultrasonography and answer the question do the findings correlate with functionality and patient satisfaction. It has been shown that people over the age of 66 who have been diagnosed with rotator cuff tendon tear, have up to 50 % chance of having a rotator cuff tendon tear in contralateral shoulder (Yamaguchi, et al. 2006). Therefore the study will evaluate the function and the integrity of the rotator cuff in both shoulders.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 150
Est. completion date September 2025
Est. primary completion date September 2025
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group N/A and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patients underwent rotator cuff repair by three orthopaedic surgeons at the Tartu University Hospital Sports Traumatology Centre between 2013 and 2019. - Subject gives an informed consent and is willing to come for one outpatient visit. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients who underwent rotator cuff repair for traumatic tears are excluded from clinical assessment (stage II). - Patients who underwent revision surgery are excluded from clinical assessment (stage II).

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Diagnostic Test:
Ultrasonography imaging
Ultrasonography: rotator cuff tendons (supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subscapularis) integrity, long head of the biceps tendon integrity and location, SASD (subacromial-subdeltoid) bursitis, synovitis and muscle atrophy.
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score
The patient self-assessment (pASES) includes 6 pain items and 10 functional items that are shoulder specific (Angst, 2008). The pASES form has 3 sections: pain, instability, ADLs (Goldhahn, 2008). Pain section: 4 questions with yes/no responses, 1 question covering number of pain tablets per day, and a VAS (visual analogue scale) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Instability section: 2 questions (1. Response yes/no about feelings of instability, 2. Quantify instability from 0 (stable) to 10 (very unstable)). Activities of daily living (ADLs): Each shoulder is included (affected/non affected), 10 items, with a 4 point ordinal scale, range: 0 (unable to perform activity) to 3 (no difficulty in doing activity) (Goldhahn 2008).
The Constant-Murley score (CMS)
The test is divided into four subscales: pain (15 points), activities of daily living (ADL) (20 points), strength (25 points) and range of motion: forward elevation, external rotation, abduction and internal rotation of the shoulder (40 points).
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)
30-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess symptoms and function of the entire upper extremity. Total scores range from 0 (minimum) to (100) maximum.

Locations

Country Name City State
Estonia Tartu University Hospital Tartu Tartumaa

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Tartu University Hospital University of Tartu

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Estonia, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Ultrasonography Integrity of the rotator cuff tendons 5 years after primary repair
Secondary American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score The higher the score, the better the outcome. 5 years after primary repair
Secondary Constant-Murley score (CMS) The higher the score, the higher the quality of the function. 5 years after primary repair
Secondary The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) The higher the score, more severe disability. 5 years after primary repair
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04974242 - Physiotherapy for Patients Awaiting Rotator Cuff Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT06055478 - Effect of Suprascapular Nerve Block and Axillary Nerve Block After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair N/A
Completed NCT04552925 - Exercises With Electromyographic Biofeedback in Conservative Treatment of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06032416 - DenCT Shoulder Bone Quality Evaluation N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04047745 - Post-operative Exparel Study Following Rotator Cuff Repair N/A
Completed NCT01029574 - Platelet Rich Plasma on Rotator Cuff Repair Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT05817578 - Profiling the RCRSP Patient: a Pain Phenotype Classification Algorithm
Not yet recruiting NCT05670080 - Does MI Have a Therapeutic Role in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair? N/A
Suspended NCT04421417 - The Effect of Microfracture Procedure on Rotator Cuff Tendon Healing N/A
Recruiting NCT06156423 - Investigation of the Effect of Motor Control Exercises in Patients Undergoing Rotator Cuff Surgery N/A
Completed NCT06145815 - Machine Learning Predictive Model for Rotator Cuff Repair Failure
Not yet recruiting NCT05009498 - Vitamin D3 Supplementation for Vitamin D Deficiency in Rotator Cuff Repair Surgery N/A
Completed NCT04594408 - Tranexamic Acid to Improve Arthroscopic Visualization in Shoulder Surgery Phase 4
Terminated NCT04855968 - The Effect of Mindfulness/Meditation on Post-operative Pain and Opioid Consumption N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04538001 - Safety and Efficacy of Rotator Cuff Function Restoration Balloon in Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tear N/A
Completed NCT04710966 - Comparison Between Arthroscopic Debridement and Repair for Partial-thickness Rotator Cuff Tears N/A
Recruiting NCT06192459 - Effect of the Muscle Strength and Range of Motion Training for Post-platelet Rich Plasma Injection in People With Rotator Cuff Partial Tear N/A
Recruiting NCT05925881 - Lower Trapezius Transfer vs Bridging Reconstruction N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04584476 - Superior Capsular Reconstruction Versus. Partial Repair for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04587037 - A Clinical Study Comparing Superior Capsule Reconstruction Using Different Graft for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tear N/A