Clinical Benefit of M89PB in Subjects With Rosacea Associated With Erythema and Sensitive Skin

Rosacea Clinical Trial

Official title: A Split-face Study Assessing the Clinical Benefit, Tolerability and Subject Satisfaction of M89PB in Subjects With Rosacea Associated With Erythema and Sensitive Skin

Status Active, not recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of the product M89 probiotic fractions in improving the symptoms of rosacea patients with sensitive skin after 30 days of treatment, in comparison with an area treated with the habitual skin care product.

20 women with sensitive skin (positive reaction to stinging test), suffering from persistent centrofacial erythema of rosacea with no more than 3 papules and pustules apply the product on half a face, twice a day, for 30 days. The subjects use their habitual skin care product on the other side of the face.

The product efficacy is supported by significant improvements in the mean basal values of the following instrumental parameters: skin hydration (increase), trans-epidermal water loss (decrease), skin erythema (a* parameter decrease).

The efficacy and the tolerability of the product is also showed by a visual clinical assessment of the face skin conditions and by stinging test. Digital images of the face of the subjects were also taken at each control time.

Furthermore, the volunteers express their judgement on the efficacy and the pleasantness of the product by means of a self-assessment questionnaire.

Clinical Trial Description

The test was carried out in a temperature and humidity-controlled room (24 ± 2 °C; 50 ± 10 % r.h.).

20 female subjects, between 20 and 60 years old, phototype I-IV according to Fitzpatrick skin type classification, with sensitive skin (positive reaction to stinging test) and suffering from persistent centrofacial erythema of rosacea with no more than 3 papules and pustules were selected for the study.

Volunteers were asked not to wash their face for at least 2 hours before performing the assessments and not to apply any products on the face for 12 hours before the basal visit.

The subjects were recruited for the study if they showed a positive response to stinging test performed with the application of a solution at 15% lactic acid on the nasolabial folds.

The volunteers rated the burning/stinging/itching/painful sensations perceived on each nasolabial fold after 2.5 and 5 minutes from the application, on the basis of the following scale: 0=no burning/stinging/itching/painful sensation; 1=mild burning/stinging/itching/painful sensation; 2=moderate burning/stinging/itching/painful sensation; 3=severe burning/stinging/itching/painful sensation.

If the sum of the score of the two time points was ≥ 3 for each nasolabial fold, the subject was considered a 'stinger', a subject with sensitive skin and could be selected for the test.

The selected subjects filled in a questionnaire on sensitive skin. The subjects applied the product M89 Probiotic Fractions on half a face, twice a day, in the morning and in the evening, for 30 days. They put two drops of the product in the palm of their hand and gently massage with their fingertips on half face. The face skin had to be cleaned and dried before the application of the product. The subjects used their standard skin care product on the side of the face not treated with M89 Probiotic Fractions. The subjects were allowed to use their habitual foundation and makeup products on the whole face.

The side of application of the product M89 Probiotic Fractions (right or left side of the face) was randomized among the subjects.

The assignment of subject number and subsequent placement on the randomization chart were made in order of appearance at the study centre on the first day.

The following evaluations were performed at the baseline, after 15 days and/or after 30 days of treatment:

Instrumental Evaluations: baseline, after 15 days and after 30 days of treatment:

• skin hydration by Corneometer CM825

• trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL) by Tewameter TM 300 MDD 4

• skin erythema by Chromameter CR400

The measurements were performed on the cheeks, on the same location at each control time.

Digital images of the face of the subjects were also taken by means of Fotofinder Dermoscope Ver. 2.0.

Clinical Evaluation: baseline, after 15 days and after 30 days of treatment

A visual clinical evaluation of each side of the face was performed by the technician related to:

• erythema

• desquamation

• number of papules and pustules (visual count)

The subjects were asked to refer about skin tightness, skin dryness, burning, itching, stinging sensations perceived on each side of the face answering to the following questions:

Skin tightness: Do you feel skin tightness? Skin dryness: Does your skin feel dry? Burning sensation: Do you suffer from burning sensation of your skin? Itching sensation: Do you suffer from itching sensation of your skin? Stinging sensation: Do you suffer from stinging/tingling sensation of your skin? The parameters erythema, desquamation, skin tightness, skin dryness, burning, itching and stinging were scored according to a 0-10 scale.

Stinging Test: baseline, after 15 days and after 30 days of treatment

A solution at 15% lactic acid was applied on the nasolabial folds of each subject. The volunteers rated the burning/stinging/itching/pain sensations perceived on each nasolabial fold after 2.5 and 5 minutes from the application, on the basis of the following scale:

0=no burning/stinging/itching/painful sensation;

1. mild burning/stinging/itching/painful sensation;

2. moderate burning/stinging/itching/painful sensation;

3. severe burning/stinging/itching/painful sensation.

Standardized Skin Surface Biopsy technique (SSSB): after 30 days of treatment The face of the volunteers was cleaned with ether to remove traces of sebum. Then a drop (about 0.05 ml) of cyanoacrylate glue was homogeneously applied to an area of 1 cm 2 at one end of a microscope slide. Then the slide (SSSB 1) was put against one cheek. The slide was left in place until the cyanoacrylate changed in consistency and then gently removed. A second SSSB (SSSB 2) was performed at the same site immediately after the first. The procedure was repeated on the other cheek in order to collect slides related to both the areas (treated with M89 and with the habitual skin care product). The SSSB 2 were analyzed with a microscope (x40) and the Demodex density (number of Demodex in 1 cm2) was determined for each slide.

Satisfaction questionnaire: after 15 days and after 30 days of treatment The subjects expressed their opinion on the efficacy and the pleasantness of the product by filling in a questionnaire referred to the side of the face treated with M89 Probiotic Fractions. ;

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Erythema
• Hypersensitivity
• Rosacea
• Sensitive Skin

• NCT number: NCT04898582
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: Institute of Skin and Product Evaluation, Italy
• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: May 18, 2021
• Completion date: May 18, 2021