Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00650767
Other study ID # ARRAY-162-201
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 2
First received
Last updated
Start date March 2008
Est. completion date July 2009

Study information

Verified date November 2020
Source Array BioPharma
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This is a Phase 2 study, involving a 12-week treatment period, designed to evaluate the effectiveness of investigational study drug ARRY-438162 in treating rheumatoid arthritis in patients on stable doses of methotrexate, and to further evaluate the safety of the study drug. Approximately 200 patients from the US, Argentina, Brazil, Hungary, Peru, Poland and Romania will be enrolled in this study.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 201
Est. completion date July 2009
Est. primary completion date July 2009
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Key Inclusion Criteria: - Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, based on the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1987 Revised Criteria, prior to first dose of study drug. - Patient has received a stable dose of methotrexate for = 6 weeks prior to first dose of study drug and is willing to continue on this regimen for the duration of the study. - Patient has received a stable dose of folate for = 6 weeks and is willing to continue on this regimen for the duration of the study. - No prior use of biological agents for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. - Additional criteria exist. Key Exclusion Criteria: - Diagnosis of any other inflammatory or non-inflammatory arthritis that may interfere with disease activity assessments or clinically apparent osteoarthritis which would affect subsequent efficacy measures. - A history of severe, progressive, and/or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiac, neurological disease or severe systemic involvement with rheumatoid arthritis. - Additional criteria exist.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
ARRY-438162, MEK inhibitor; oral
multiple dose, single schedule
Placebo; oral
matching placebo

Locations

Country Name City State
Argentina Asistencia Integral en Reumatologia Buenos Aires
Argentina CEMIC Buenos Aires
Argentina Hospital Britanico Buenos Aires
Argentina CER San Juan San Juan
Argentina Centro Medico Privado de Reumatologia San Miguel de Tucumán
Argentina Centro de Investigaciones Clinicas del Litoral SRL Santa Fe
Brazil CETI - Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná Curitiba PR
Brazil Médicos Unidos Ltda. Goiânia GO
Brazil Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Porto Alegre RS
Brazil Hospital São Lucas da da Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre RS
Brazil Hospital Heliópolis São Paulo SP
Brazil Hospital São Paulo / Instituto Paulista de Reumatologia São Paulo SP
Brazil Instituto de Medicina Avançada (IMA Brasil) São Paulo SP
Hungary Budai Irgalmasrendi Kórház - Allergólógia és Immunológia Budapest
Hungary Synexus Ltd Hungary Budapest
Hungary Békés Megyei Pándy Kálmán Kórház - Rheumatology Gyula
Hungary Mozgasszervi Rehabilitacios Kozpont Mezokövesd
Hungary Fejér Megyei Szent György Kórház - Rheumatology Székesfehérvár
Hungary MÁV Kórház - Clinical Pharmacology Szolnok
Hungary Vas Megyei Markusovszky Korhaz Lajos Általános, Rehabilitációs és Gyógyfürdo Kórház, Egyetemi Oktató Kórház, Zártköruen Muködo Nonprofit Részvénytársaság - Rheumatology Szombathely
Peru Instituto de Investigacion y Seguridad Medica EIRL Arequipa
Peru Clínica Ricardo Palma- Sitio de Investigacion de Reumatologia Lima
Peru Clinica San Felipe - Centro de Estudios Clinicos CGYM Lima
Peru Hospital Maria Auxiliadora - Centro de Investigaciones Medicas Lima
Poland Centrum Osteoporozy i Chorób Kostno-Stawowych Bialystok
Poland Wojewódzki Szpital Zespolony - Oddzial Reumatologiczny Elblag
Poland Centrum Leczenia Chorob Cywilizacyjnych Gdynia
Poland NZOZ Reumed Lublin
Poland Centrum Leczenia Chorob Cywilizacyjnych Warszawa
Poland Synexus SCM Sp. z o.o. Wroclaw
Romania Spitalul Clinic "Sf, Maria" Bucuresti
Romania Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta Cluj-Napoca
Romania Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta Targu Mures
Romania Cabinet Medical "Prof. Dr. Miorara Banciu" Timisoara
United States Spartanburg Medical Research Spartanburg South Carolina

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Array Biopharma, now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Argentina,  Brazil,  Hungary,  Peru,  Poland,  Romania, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Rate at Week 12 The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The ACR 20 has a positive outcome if 20% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts were achieved as well as a 20% improvement in at least three of the other five criteria.
Week 12
Secondary American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Rate at Week 1 The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The ACR 20 has a positive outcome if 20% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts were achieved as well as a 20% improvement in at least three of the other five criteria.
Week 1
Secondary American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Rate at Week 2 The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The ACR 20 has a positive outcome if 20% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts were achieved as well as a 20% improvement in at least three of the other five criteria.
Week 2
Secondary American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Rate at Week 4 The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The ACR 20 has a positive outcome if 20% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts were achieved as well as a 20% improvement in at least three of the other five criteria.
Week 4
Secondary American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Rate at Week 8 The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The ACR 20 has a positive outcome if 20% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts were achieved as well as a 20% improvement in at least three of the other five criteria.
Week 8
Secondary American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Rate at Week 16 (Follow-up) The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The ACR 20 has a positive outcome if 20% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts were achieved as well as a 20% improvement in at least three of the other five criteria.
Week 16 (Follow-up)
Secondary American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Rate at Week 1 The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The ACR 50 has a positive outcome if 50% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts were achieved as well as a 50% improvement in at least three of the other five criteria.
Week 1
Secondary American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Rate at Week 2 The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The ACR 50 has a positive outcome if 50% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts were achieved as well as a 50% improvement in at least three of the other five criteria.
Week 2
Secondary American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Rate at Week 4 The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The ACR 50 has a positive outcome if 50% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts were achieved as well as a 50% improvement in at least three of the other five criteria.
Week 4
Secondary American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Rate at Week 8 The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The ACR 50 has a positive outcome if 50% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts were achieved as well as a 50% improvement in at least three of the other five criteria.
Week 8
Secondary American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Rate at Week 12 The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The ACR 50 has a positive outcome if 50% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts were achieved as well as a 50% improvement in at least three of the other five criteria.
Week 12
Secondary American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Rate at Week 16 (Follow-up) The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The ACR 50 has a positive outcome if 50% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts were achieved as well as a 50% improvement in at least three of the other five criteria.
Week 16 (Follow-up)
Secondary American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Rate at Week 1 The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The ACR 70 has a positive outcome if 70% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts were achieved as well as a 70% improvement in at least three of the other five criteria.
Week 1
Secondary American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Rate at Week 2 The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The ACR 70 has a positive outcome if 70% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts were achieved as well as a 70% improvement in at least three of the other five criteria.
Week 2
Secondary American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Rate at Week 4 The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The ACR 70 has a positive outcome if 70% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts were achieved as well as a 70% improvement in at least three of the other five criteria.
Week 4
Secondary American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Rate at Week 8 The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The ACR 70 has a positive outcome if 70% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts were achieved as well as a 70% improvement in at least three of the other five criteria.
Week 8
Secondary American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Rate at Week 12 The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The ACR 70 has a positive outcome if 70% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts were achieved as well as a 70% improvement in at least three of the other five criteria.
Week 12
Secondary American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Rate at Week 16 (Follow-up) The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The ACR 70 has a positive outcome if 70% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts were achieved as well as a 70% improvement in at least three of the other five criteria.
Week 16 (Follow-up)
Secondary American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria - Tender Joint Count (28) The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Tender joint count is calculated based on the tenderness response of 28 joints. Possible values ranged from 0 to 28. A lower score indicated less joint tenderness.
Baseline
Secondary American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria - Tender Joint Count (28) The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Tender joint count is calculated based on the tenderness response of 28 joints. Possible values ranged from 0 to 28. A lower score indicated less joint tenderness.
Week 1
Secondary American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria - Tender Joint Count (28) The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Tender joint count is calculated based on the tenderness response of 28 joints. Possible values ranged from 0 to 28. A lower score indicated less joint tenderness.
Week 2
Secondary American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria - Tender Joint Count (28) The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Tender joint count is calculated based on the tenderness response of 28 joints. Possible values ranged from 0 to 28. A lower score indicated less joint tenderness.
Week 4
Secondary American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria - Tender Joint Count (28) The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Tender joint count is calculated based on the tenderness response of 28 joints. Possible values ranged from 0 to 28. A lower score indicated less joint tenderness.
Week 8
Secondary American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria - Tender Joint Count (28) The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Tender joint count is calculated based on the tenderness response of 28 joints. Possible values ranged from 0 to 28. A lower score indicated less joint tenderness.
Week 12
Secondary American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria - Tender Joint Count (28) The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Tender joint count is calculated based on the tenderness response of 28 joints. Possible values ranged from 0 to 28. A lower score indicated less joint tenderness.
Week 16 (Follow-up)
Secondary American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria - Swollen Joint Count (28) The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The swollen joint count was calculated based on the swelling response of 28 joints. Possible values ranged from 0 to 28. A lower score indicated less joint swelling.
Baseline
Secondary American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria - Swollen Joint Count (28) The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The swollen joint count was calculated based on the swelling response of 28 joints. Possible values ranged from 0 to 28. A lower score indicated less joint swelling.
Week 1
Secondary American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria - Swollen Joint Count (28) The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The swollen joint count was calculated based on the swelling response of 28 joints. Possible values ranged from 0 to 28. A lower score indicated less joint swelling.
Week 2
Secondary American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria - Swollen Joint Count (28) The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The swollen joint count was calculated based on the swelling response of 28 joints. Possible values ranged from 0 to 28. A lower score indicated less joint swelling.
Week 4
Secondary American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria - Swollen Joint Count (28) The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The swollen joint count was calculated based on the swelling response of 28 joints. Possible values ranged from 0 to 28. A lower score indicated less joint swelling.
Week 8
Secondary American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria - Swollen Joint Count (28) The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The swollen joint count was calculated based on the swelling response of 28 joints. Possible values ranged from 0 to 28. A lower score indicated less joint swelling.
Week 12
Secondary American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria - Swollen Joint Count (28) The ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Criteria is a standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The swollen joint count was calculated based on the swelling response of 28 joints. Possible values ranged from 0 to 28. A lower score indicated less joint swelling.
Week 16 (Follow-up)
Secondary Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) The Patient's Assessment of Pain utilized a 0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no pain and 100 being most severe pain. Baseline
Secondary Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) The Patient's Assessment of Pain utilized a 0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no pain and 100 being most severe pain. Week 1
Secondary Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) The Patient's Assessment of Pain utilized a 0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no pain and 100 being most severe pain. Week 2
Secondary Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) The Patient's Assessment of Pain utilized a 0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no pain and 100 being most severe pain. Week 4
Secondary Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) The Patient's Assessment of Pain utilized a 0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no pain and 100 being most severe pain. Week 8
Secondary Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) The Patient's Assessment of Pain utilized a 0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no pain and 100 being most severe pain. Week 12
Secondary Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) The Patient's Assessment of Pain utilized a 0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no pain and 100 being most severe pain. Week 16 (Follow-up)
Secondary Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis - Visual Analog Score (VAS) The Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis was an evaluation based on the patient's disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination, and was independent of the Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The patient self-assessed how the arthritis affected their lives at the time of the visit using the visual analog scale (VAS).
Patients answered the following: "Considering all the ways in which illness and health conditions may affect you at this time, please make a mark below to show how you are doing." The patient's response was recorded using the 100 mm visual analog scale between 0 (Very Well) and 100 (Very Poorly).
Baseline
Secondary Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis - Visual Analog Score (VAS) The Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis was an evaluation based on the patient's disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination, and was independent of the Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The patient self-assessed how the arthritis affected their lives at the time of the visit using the visual analog scale (VAS).
Patients answered the following: "Considering all the ways in which illness and health conditions may affect you at this time, please make a mark below to show how you are doing." The patient's response was recorded using the 100 mm visual analog scale between 0 (Very Well) and 100 (Very Poorly).
Week 1
Secondary Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis - Visual Analog Score (VAS) The Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis was an evaluation based on the patient's disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination, and was independent of the Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The patient self-assessed how the arthritis affected their lives at the time of the visit using the visual analog scale (VAS).
Patients answered the following: "Considering all the ways in which illness and health conditions may affect you at this time, please make a mark below to show how you are doing." The patient's response was recorded using the 100 mm visual analog scale between 0 (Very Well) and 100 (Very Poorly).
Week 2
Secondary Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis - Visual Analog Score (VAS) The Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis was an evaluation based on the patient's disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination, and was independent of the Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The patient self-assessed how the arthritis affected their lives at the time of the visit using the visual analog scale (VAS).
Patients answered the following: "Considering all the ways in which illness and health conditions may affect you at this time, please make a mark below to show how you are doing." The patient's response was recorded using the 100 mm visual analog scale between 0 (Very Well) and 100 (Very Poorly).
Week 4
Secondary Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis - Visual Analog Score (VAS) The Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis was an evaluation based on the patient's disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination, and was independent of the Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The patient self-assessed how the arthritis affected their lives at the time of the visit using the visual analog scale (VAS).
Patients answered the following: "Considering all the ways in which illness and health conditions may affect you at this time, please make a mark below to show how you are doing." The patient's response was recorded using the 100 mm visual analog scale between 0 (Very Well) and 100 (Very Poorly).
Week 8
Secondary Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis - Visual Analog Score (VAS) The Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis was an evaluation based on the patient's disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination, and was independent of the Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The patient self-assessed how the arthritis affected their lives at the time of the visit using the visual analog scale (VAS).
Patients answered the following: "Considering all the ways in which illness and health conditions may affect you at this time, please make a mark below to show how you are doing." The patient's response was recorded using the 100 mm visual analog scale between 0 (Very Well) and 100 (Very Poorly).
Week 12
Secondary Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis - Visual Analog Score (VAS) The Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis was an evaluation based on the patient's disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination, and was independent of the Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The patient self-assessed how the arthritis affected their lives at the time of the visit using the visual analog scale (VAS).
Patients answered the following: "Considering all the ways in which illness and health conditions may affect you at this time, please make a mark below to show how you are doing." The patient's response was recorded using the 100 mm visual analog scale between 0 (Very Well) and 100 (Very Poorly).
Week 16 (Follow-up)
Secondary Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis - Visual Analog Score (VAS) The Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis was an evaluation based on the patient's disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination, and was independent of the Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The Investigator assessed how the overall arthritis appeared at the time of the visit using the visual analog scale (VAS).
The physician's response was recorded using the 100 mm visual analog scale between 0 (Very Good) and 100 (Very Bad).
Baseline
Secondary Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis - Visual Analog Score (VAS) The Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis was an evaluation based on the patient's disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination, and was independent of the Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The Investigator assessed how the overall arthritis appeared at the time of the visit using the visual analog scale (VAS).
The physician's response was recorded using the 100 mm visual analog scale between 0 (Very Good) and 100 (Very Bad).
Week 1
Secondary Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis - Visual Analog Score (VAS) The Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis was an evaluation based on the patient's disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination, and was independent of the Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The Investigator assessed how the overall arthritis appeared at the time of the visit using the visual analog scale (VAS).
The physician's response was recorded using the 100 mm visual analog scale between 0 (Very Good) and 100 (Very Bad).
Week 2
Secondary Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis - Visual Analog Score (VAS) The Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis was an evaluation based on the patient's disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination, and was independent of the Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The Investigator assessed how the overall arthritis appeared at the time of the visit using the visual analog scale (VAS).
The physician's response was recorded using the 100 mm visual analog scale between 0 (Very Good) and 100 (Very Bad).
Week 4
Secondary Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis - Visual Analog Score (VAS) The Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis was an evaluation based on the patient's disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination, and was independent of the Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The Investigator assessed how the overall arthritis appeared at the time of the visit using the visual analog scale (VAS).
The physician's response was recorded using the 100 mm visual analog scale between 0 (Very Good) and 100 (Very Bad).
Week 8
Secondary Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis - Visual Analog Score (VAS) The Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis was an evaluation based on the patient's disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination, and was independent of the Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The Investigator assessed how the overall arthritis appeared at the time of the visit using the visual analog scale (VAS).
The physician's response was recorded using the 100 mm visual analog scale between 0 (Very Good) and 100 (Very Bad).
Week 12
Secondary Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis - Visual Analog Score (VAS) The Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis was an evaluation based on the patient's disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination, and was independent of the Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The Investigator assessed how the overall arthritis appeared at the time of the visit using the visual analog scale (VAS).
The physician's response was recorded using the 100 mm visual analog scale between 0 (Very Good) and 100 (Very Bad).
Week 16 (Follow-up)
Secondary Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) The HAQ-DI contains a list of items that assessed the degree of difficulty experienced in 8 categories of daily living activities (included in 20 questions) over the past week: Dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2 or 3 items. For each question in the HAQ-DI, the level of difficulty was scored from 0 to 3 with 0 equal to "without difficulty," 1 equal to "with some difficulty," 2 equal to "with much difficulty" and 3 equal to "unable to do." Any activity that required assistance from another individual or required the use of an assistive device adjusted to a minimum score of 2 to represent a more limited functional status.
The HAQ-DI score takes values between 0 and 3, with a higher score indicating greater disability.
Baseline
Secondary Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) The HAQ-DI contains a list of items that assessed the degree of difficulty experienced in 8 categories of daily living activities (included in 20 questions) over the past week: Dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2 or 3 items. For each question in the HAQ-DI, the level of difficulty was scored from 0 to 3 with 0 equal to "without difficulty," 1 equal to "with some difficulty," 2 equal to "with much difficulty" and 3 equal to "unable to do." Any activity that required assistance from another individual or required the use of an assistive device adjusted to a minimum score of 2 to represent a more limited functional status.
The HAQ-DI score takes values between 0 and 3, with a higher score indicating greater disability.
Week 1
Secondary Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) The HAQ-DI contains a list of items that assessed the degree of difficulty experienced in 8 categories of daily living activities (included in 20 questions) over the past week: Dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2 or 3 items. For each question in the HAQ-DI, the level of difficulty was scored from 0 to 3 with 0 equal to "without difficulty," 1 equal to "with some difficulty," 2 equal to "with much difficulty" and 3 equal to "unable to do." Any activity that required assistance from another individual or required the use of an assistive device adjusted to a minimum score of 2 to represent a more limited functional status.
The HAQ-DI score takes values between 0 and 3, with a higher score indicating greater disability.
Week 2
Secondary Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) The HAQ-DI contains a list of items that assessed the degree of difficulty experienced in 8 categories of daily living activities (included in 20 questions) over the past week: Dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2 or 3 items. For each question in the HAQ-DI, the level of difficulty was scored from 0 to 3 with 0 equal to "without difficulty," 1 equal to "with some difficulty," 2 equal to "with much difficulty" and 3 equal to "unable to do." Any activity that required assistance from another individual or required the use of an assistive device adjusted to a minimum score of 2 to represent a more limited functional status.
The HAQ-DI score takes values between 0 and 3, with a higher score indicating greater disability.
Week 4
Secondary Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) The HAQ-DI contains a list of items that assessed the degree of difficulty experienced in 8 categories of daily living activities (included in 20 questions) over the past week: Dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2 or 3 items. For each question in the HAQ-DI, the level of difficulty was scored from 0 to 3 with 0 equal to "without difficulty," 1 equal to "with some difficulty," 2 equal to "with much difficulty" and 3 equal to "unable to do." Any activity that required assistance from another individual or required the use of an assistive device adjusted to a minimum score of 2 to represent a more limited functional status.
The HAQ-DI score takes values between 0 and 3, with a higher score indicating greater disability.
Week 8
Secondary Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) The HAQ-DI contains a list of items that assessed the degree of difficulty experienced in 8 categories of daily living activities (included in 20 questions) over the past week: Dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2 or 3 items. For each question in the HAQ-DI, the level of difficulty was scored from 0 to 3 with 0 equal to "without difficulty," 1 equal to "with some difficulty," 2 equal to "with much difficulty" and 3 equal to "unable to do." Any activity that required assistance from another individual or required the use of an assistive device adjusted to a minimum score of 2 to represent a more limited functional status.
The HAQ-DI score takes values between 0 and 3, with a higher score indicating greater disability.
Week 12
Secondary Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) The HAQ-DI contains a list of items that assessed the degree of difficulty experienced in 8 categories of daily living activities (included in 20 questions) over the past week: Dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2 or 3 items. For each question in the HAQ-DI, the level of difficulty was scored from 0 to 3 with 0 equal to "without difficulty," 1 equal to "with some difficulty," 2 equal to "with much difficulty" and 3 equal to "unable to do." Any activity that required assistance from another individual or required the use of an assistive device adjusted to a minimum score of 2 to represent a more limited functional status.
The HAQ-DI score takes values between 0 and 3, with a higher score indicating greater disability.
Week 16 (Follow-up)
Secondary C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Baseline Baseline
Secondary C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 1 Week 1
Secondary C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 2 Week 2
Secondary C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 4 Week 4
Secondary C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 8 Week 8
Secondary C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 12 Week 12
Secondary C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 16 (Follow-up) Week 16 (Follow-up)
Secondary Disease Activity Score (DAS) Using C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-4[CRP]) The DAS28-4(CRP) score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. DAS28-4(CRP) is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity and CRP. DAS28 provides a number on a scale (0 to 10) indicating current disease activity. A score above 5.1 means high disease activity and a score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity. Baseline
Secondary Disease Activity Score (DAS) Using C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-4[CRP]) The DAS28-4(CRP) score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. DAS28-4(CRP) is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity and CRP. DAS28 provides a number on a scale (0 to 10) indicating current disease activity. A score above 5.1 means high disease activity and a score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity. Week 1
Secondary Disease Activity Score (DAS) Using C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-4[CRP]) The DAS28-4(CRP) score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. DAS28-4(CRP) is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity and CRP. DAS28 provides a number on a scale (0 to 10) indicating current disease activity. A score above 5.1 means high disease activity and a score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity. Week 2
Secondary Disease Activity Score (DAS) Using C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-4[CRP]) The DAS28-4(CRP) score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. DAS28-4(CRP) is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity and CRP. DAS28 provides a number on a scale (0 to 10) indicating current disease activity. A score above 5.1 means high disease activity and a score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity. Week 4
Secondary Disease Activity Score (DAS) Using C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-4[CRP]) The DAS28-4(CRP) score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. DAS28-4(CRP) is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity and CRP. DAS28 provides a number on a scale (0 to 10) indicating current disease activity. A score above 5.1 means high disease activity and a score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity. Week 8
Secondary Disease Activity Score (DAS) Using C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-4[CRP]) The DAS28-4(CRP) score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. DAS28-4(CRP) is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity and CRP. DAS28 provides a number on a scale (0 to 10) indicating current disease activity. A score above 5.1 means high disease activity and a score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity. Week 12
Secondary Disease Activity Score (DAS) Using C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-4[CRP]) The DAS28-4(CRP) score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. DAS28-4(CRP) is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity and CRP. DAS28 provides a number on a scale (0 to 10) indicating current disease activity. A score above 5.1 means high disease activity and a score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity. Week 16 (Follow-up)
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Physical Functioning The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Baseline
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Physical Functioning The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 4
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Physical Functioning The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 8
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Physical Functioning The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 12
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Physical Functioning The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 16 (Follow-up)
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Role-Physical The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Baseline
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Role-Physical The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 4
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Role-Physical The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 8
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Role-Physical The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 12
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Role-Physical The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 16 (Follow-up)
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Bodily Pain The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Baseline
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Bodily Pain The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 4
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Bodily Pain The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 8
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Bodily Pain The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 12
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Bodily Pain The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 16 (Follow-up)
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - General Health The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Baseline
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - General Health The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 4
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - General Health The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 8
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - General Health The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 12
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - General Health The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 16 (Follow-up)
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Vitality The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Baseline
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Vitality The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 4
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Vitality The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 8
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Vitality The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 12
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Vitality The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 16 (Follow-up)
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Social Functioning The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Baseline
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Social Functioning The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 4
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Social Functioning The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 8
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Social Functioning The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 12
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Social Functioning The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 16 (Follow-up)
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Role-Emotional The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Baseline
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Role-Emotional The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 4
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Role-Emotional The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 8
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Role-Emotional The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 12
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Role-Emotional The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 16 (Follow-up)
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Mental Health The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Baseline
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Mental Health The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 4
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Mental Health The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 8
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Mental Health The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 12
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Mental Health The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability.
Week 16 (Follow-up)
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Mental Health Component Score SF-36V2 is a generic 36-item generic health status measure covering 2 summary measures: physical component summary (PCS) and mental health component score (MCS); it consists of 8 subscales. The MCS is represented by 4 subscales: vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Participants self-report on items in a subscale that have choices per item. Scoring is done for both MCS subscale scores and summary scores; for each, the range is 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Baseline
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Mental Health Component Score The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures. The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability. Additionally, two summary scale scores can be calculated: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Summary statistics were calculated for each of the 8 scales, the 2 summary measures, and changes from baseline for each treatment group. Week 4
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Mental Health Component Score The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures. The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability. Additionally, two summary scale scores can be calculated: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Summary statistics were calculated for each of the 8 scales, the 2 summary measures, and changes from baseline for each treatment group. Week 8
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Mental Health Component Score The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures. The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability. Additionally, two summary scale scores can be calculated: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Summary statistics were calculated for each of the 8 scales, the 2 summary measures, and changes from baseline for each treatment group. Week 12
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Mental Health Component Score The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures. The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability. Additionally, two summary scale scores can be calculated: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Summary statistics were calculated for each of the 8 scales, the 2 summary measures, and changes from baseline for each treatment group. Week 16 (Follow-up)
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Physical Component Score The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures. The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability. Additionally, two summary scale scores can be calculated: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Summary statistics were calculated for each of the 8 scales, the 2 summary measures, and changes from baseline for each treatment group. Baseline
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Physical Component Score The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures. The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability. Additionally, two summary scale scores can be calculated: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Summary statistics were calculated for each of the 8 scales, the 2 summary measures, and changes from baseline for each treatment group. Week 4
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Physical Component Score The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures. The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability. Additionally, two summary scale scores can be calculated: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Summary statistics were calculated for each of the 8 scales, the 2 summary measures, and changes from baseline for each treatment group. Week 8
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Physical Component Score The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures. The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability. Additionally, two summary scale scores can be calculated: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Summary statistics were calculated for each of the 8 scales, the 2 summary measures, and changes from baseline for each treatment group. Week 12
Secondary SF-36 Health Questionnaire - Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Physical Component Score The SF-36v2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures. The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability, while the higher the score the less disability. Additionally, two summary scale scores can be calculated: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Summary statistics were calculated for each of the 8 scales, the 2 summary measures, and changes from baseline for each treatment group. Week 16 (Follow-up)
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04226131 - MusculRA: The Effects of Rheumatoid Arthritis on Skeletal Muscle Biomechanics N/A
Completed NCT04171414 - A Study to Evaluate Usability of Subcutaneous Auto-injector of CT-P17 in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Phase 3
Completed NCT02833350 - Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Phase 2
Completed NCT04255134 - Biologics for Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain (BIORA-PAIN) Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05615246 - Exactech Humeral Reconstruction Prosthesis of Shoulder Arthroplasty PMCF (HRP)
Completed NCT03248518 - Lessening the Impact of Fatigue in Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases N/A
Completed NCT03514355 - MBSR in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients With Controlled Disease But Persistent Depressive Symptoms N/A
Recruiting NCT06005220 - SBD121, a Synbiotic Medical Food for RA Management N/A
Recruiting NCT05451615 - Efficacy and Safety of Abatacept Combined With JAK Inhibitor for Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis Phase 3
Completed NCT05054920 - Eccentric Versus Concentric Exercises for Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis N/A
Completed NCT02037737 - Impact and Use of Abatacept IV for Rheumatoid Arthritis in Real Life Setting N/A
Recruiting NCT04079374 - Comparative Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity Study of Etanercept and Enbrel Phase 3
Completed NCT02504268 - Effects of Abatacept in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05496855 - Remote Care in People With Rheumatoid Arthritis N/A
Completed NCT05051943 - A Study of the Real-world Use of an Adalimumab Biosimilar and Evaluation of Nutritional Status on the Therapeutic Response
Recruiting NCT06103773 - A Study of Single and Multiple Oral Doses of TollB-001 Phase 1
Recruiting NCT06031415 - Study of GS-0272 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis Phase 1
Completed NCT05999266 - The Cartilage and Muscle Thickness on Knee Pain in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Recruiting NCT05302934 - Evaluation of the PHENO4U Data Platform in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty
Recruiting NCT04169100 - Novel Form of Acquired Long QT Syndrome Phase 4