Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Active, not recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04224948 |
Other study ID # |
19-5429 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Active, not recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
January 3, 2020 |
Est. completion date |
December 31, 2024 |
Study information
Verified date |
February 2024 |
Source |
University Health Network, Toronto |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Retroperitoneal sarcoma(RPS) is a rare cancer that is difficult to cure as it typically
presents as a very large abdominal mass, and complete removal with clear margins is
challenging . This study will focus on improving the outcomes of surgery by treating RPS
before surgery, to make resection more effective. The role of chemotherapy as a preoperative
treatment for RPS is highly controversial. Response to chemotherapy is unpredictable and if
the patient's tumour progresses instead of responding, the window of opportunity for
resection will be lost. Conventional cross sectional imaging (CT scan) is inadequate to
measure response to chemotherapy until 5-6 cycles have been given, possibly with no
improvement. Thus it is critical to develop an earlier and reliable way to assess response.
Functional imaging by PET scan is used in other tumour types to identify early response to
treatment. PET imaging may provide a more meaningful assessment of RPS response to systemic
therapy much earlier in the course of treatment than conventional imaging, allowing timely
modification of the treatment plan. This study will define the role of PET imaging in
evaluating early response to systemic therapy in high grade RPS, improving patient treatment.
Description:
Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are derived from mesenchymal cells, and can arise at any site.
Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) account for ~15% of STS, and patients have much worse survival
outcomes than for extremity STS. Local (abdominal) recurrence of RPS is very common, due to
the challenges of obtaining complete resection of these large masses that abut critical
central compartment structures, such as the inferior vena cava and aorta. There is currently
intense interest in using preoperative therapy to downsize/cytoreduce RPS and hopefully
improve oncologic outcomes. Studies have shown that preoperative radiation does not
cytoreduce these tumours. In this study, the potential of systemic therapy for cytoreduction
will be examined.
The standard systemic therapy regimen for treatment of patients with STS remains
Adriamycin/Ifosphamide, although side effects can be tolerated only by relatively young and
fit patients. The use of this regimen preoperatively for extremity STS results in average
response rates of about 30-40%, as judged by histologic assessment of the resected specimen.
The international experience with preoperative chemotherapy for RPS is very limited, and
there are no published reports.
Functional imaging may provide a more meaningful assessment of tumour response to systemic
therapy. PET-MR is a newer modality that may hold promise in assessing solid tumour response
and its potential utility is currently of rapidly growing interest. Conventional MRI can
offer a more detailed assessment of tumour relationships to adjacent structures than can CT,
particularly in STS. Integration of PET with MR has the potential to provide information
about metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and to help guide surgical planning.There are no data
available on the utility of PET-MR in evaluating tumour response to chemotherapy in STS.
At present, the role of chemotherapy as a preoperative treatment for retroperitoneal sarcoma
(RPS) is undefined and controversial. The sarcoma group at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
(PMCC) has had some experience with this treatment paradigm, but like most sarcoma groups in
Ontario, and Canada, has reserved preoperative chemotherapy for frankly unresectable and
borderline resectable tumours for which downsizing would potentially render resection more
feasible. At present, CT-scan imaging is performed after 2 cycles of chemotherapy, and if
there is no frank progression of the cancer, chemotherapy is continued for another 3-4
cycles. By that point the tumour is smaller on CT scan in about 30% of patients. There are 2
main problems with this approach: 1)70% of the patients may have undergone 5-6 cycles of
chemotherapy with no apparent benefit; and 2) there may be a metabolic response and
associated benefit without a change in tumour size. The ability to reliably assess tumour
response earlier on (i.e. after 1 cycle) would significantly influence the care of these
patients as ineffective chemotherapy could be terminated after 1 cycle and the regimen could
be modified, or surgery could happen right away before the window of resectability is lost.