View clinical trials related to Respiratory Tract Infections.
Filter by:Study to assess the efficacy and safety of XC8, film-coated tablets, 10 mg in comparison with placebo in patients with dry non-productive cough against acute respiratory infection.
Study to assess the efficacy and safety of XC8, film-coated tablets, 10 mg in comparison with placebo in patients with dry non-productive cough against acute respiratory infections, and to determine the dosing regimen of XC8, film-coated tablets, 10 mg for treatment of dry non-productive cough against acute respiratory infections.
The study is planned to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of Ingavirin®, syrup, 30 mg/5 ml, in the treatment of influenza or other acute respiratory infections in children from 6 months to 2 years compared with placebo.
This is a randomized, open-label, parallel-arm study to investigate the efficacy and safety of pamrevlumab in patients with documented SARS-CoV-2 infection. The study consists of screening, a treatment period, and a follow-up period. The study will enroll patients who have been hospitalized and who are not currently on invasive mechanical ventilation. The treatment period is open ended, and patients will be randomized to treatment with pamrevlumab or standard of care in a 1:1 ratio according to a pre-generated randomization list. Pamrevlumab dosing, 30 mg/kg IV, will be administered at day 1, day 7 and day 14. Based on Investigator's decision, treatment may be continued every 3 weeks after day 14, up to 11 weeks. A follow-up by visit or phone call will be performed 8 and 12 weeks after the end of the last dose of treatment. The treatment period for an individual patient will not exceed 11 weeks.
Antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) is the most common gastrointestinal complication of antibiotic use, with potentially serious clinical impact. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of Saccharomyces boulardii in the prevention of AAD in adult patients with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) treated in a hospital. A multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study is conducted whereby adults who are hospitalized due to LRTI and treated with intravenous antibiotics and randomized to capsules containing S. boulardii or indistinguishable placebo. The outcome measures were: relevant clinical features, gastrointestinal symptoms, and adverse events.
TAFFIX is a nasal powder spray that immediately creates a protective acidic barrier on the nasal mucosa against infection by inhaled viruses. The protective barrier lasts 5 hours. TAFFIX is approved as a medical device in Israel, intended for use to block inhaled viruses within the nasal cavity. In Europe, it is registered as a medical device indicated for use as a protective mechanical barrier against allergens and viruses (e.g., SARS-CoV-2) within the nasal cavity. TAFFIX is used as additional safety mean together with masks, hygiene, and social distancing. The study rationale is to evaluate whether daily use of TaffiX™ as prophylaxis will reduce the rate of SARS- CoV-2 infection and other upper respiratory infections, compared to the placebo control rate.
This is a randomised controlled experiment in the form of a web based survey study which randomly exposes participants to different forms of public health messages, after which participants will be assessed on their intent to take up the COVID-19 vaccine, recommend the vaccine, and also willingness to propagate the exposed message.
In this study, it is hypothesized that administration of 5-ALA-Phosphate + SFC in subjects vaccinated against Covid-19 could contribute in enhancing the targeted function of the immune system, which might lead to re-activation and/or increase of the vaccination response. Thus, in the present study, we will be evaluating the safety and efficacy of 5-ALA-Phosphate + SFC in subjects receiving the Covid-19 vaccine.
COVID-19 infection are characterized by fever and signs of acute respiratory infection. A worsening of respiratory symptoms that can lead to respiratory failure. The decompensation can then be brutal and require rapid recourse to respiratory assistance. The contribution of clinical examination (auscultation and monitoring of oxygen saturation in particular) remains unsatisfactory in predicting an unfavorable course. The interest of pulmonary ultrasound is known in the management of pulmonary infections. However, estimating the severity of lung damage at an early stage could be of great help in monitoring and caring for patients. Ultrasound could meet this need in general practice, the chest scanner is often unavailable in these situations. Ultrasound signs are associated with severe forms. The contribution of pulmonary ultrasound seems particularly interesting in the context of the reassessment of patients during the worsening phase of symptoms (D5-D10). Estimate the prevalence of ultrasound signs in patients with an acute respiratory infection suspected or confirmed to be COVID-19, at the time of the worsening phase (between D5 and D10 of the onset of symptoms). The prevalence of ultrasound lung lesions under COVID-19 may be essential to consider the development of the ultrasound tool in primary care. Indeed, if the contribution of ultrasound is now recognized in intensive care or emergency, its place in general medicine still raises questions.
In this trial the researchers plan to recruit 25,000 volunteers to be randomly allocated either wearing sunglasses or ordinary glasses in public spaces where they are close to other people, or not wear glasses in such circumstances. For each participant the trial period is 2 weeks, after which they will be asked to complete a brief questionnaire which includes questions about results of COVID-19 tests during the trial period.