View clinical trials related to Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Filter by:Acute Respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a severe condition in which protective ventilation is a critical point in its management. Positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) setting can be challenging for clinicians and high PEEP has been associated with better outcome in moderate and severe ARDS. Recently, recruitment to inflation ratio and airway closure have been investigated in order to help PEEP adjustment. However, ventilatory maneuvers are performed with a low level of PEEP and therefore expose to derecruitment and oxygen desaturation. So far, the risk of oxygen desaturation has not been investigated and risk factors are unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of oxygen desaturation during ventilatory maneuvers at low level of PEEP in patients with moderate or severe ARDS
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is often complicated by Right Ventricular Dysfunction (RVD), and the incidence can be as high as 64%. The mechanism includes pulmonary vascular dysfunction and right heart systolic dysfunction. Pulmonary vascular dysfunction includes acute vascular inflammation, pulmonary vascular edema, thrombosis and pulmonary vascular remodeling. Alveolar collapse and over distension can also lead to increased pulmonary vascular resistance, Preventing the development of acute cor pulmonale in patients with acute respiratory distress. ARDS patients with RVD have a worse prognosis and a significantly increased risk of death, which is an independent risk factor for death in ARDS patients. Therefore, implementing a right heart-protective mechanical ventilation strategy may reduce the incidence of RVD. APRV is an inverse mechanical ventilation mode with transient pressure release under continuous positive airway pressure, which can effectively improve oxygenation and reduce ventilator-associated lung injury. However, its effect on right ventricular function is still controversial. Low tidal volume (LTV) is a mechanical ventilation strategy widely used in ARDS patients. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with LTV, APRV improved oxygenation more significantly, reduced the time of mechanical ventilation, and even had a tendency to improve the mortality of ARDS patients However, randomized controlled studies have shown that compared with LTV, APRV improves oxygenation more significantly and also increases the mean airway pressure. Therefore, some scholars speculate that APRV may increase the intrathoracic pressure, pulmonary circulatory resistance, and the risk of right heart dysfunction but this speculation is not supported by clinical research evidence. In addition, APRV may improve right ventricular function by correcting hypoxia and hypercapnia, promoting lung recruitment and reducing pulmonary circulation resistance. Therefore, it is very important to clarify this effect for whether APRV can be safely used and popularized in clinic.we aim to conduct a single-center randomized controlled study to further compare the effects of APRV and LTV on right ventricular function in patients with ARDS, pulmonary circulatory resistance (PVR) right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling (RV-PA coupling), and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR).
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition characterized by acute respiratory failure with hypoxemia, noncardiogenic or non-fluid overload pulmonary edema, bilateral diffuse opacities on chest radiograph in the presence of a predisposing factor. In ARDS there is activation of the inflammatory cascade which is very intense and persistent in the severe types. It was highlighted that the inflammatory cytokines in patients with ARDS or sepsis is similar to that observed in COVID-19 positive patients. Emerging therapies include immunomodulation and the administration of mesenchymal stem cells for the modulation of lung repair through the release of cytokines and growth factors that modulate the local inflammatory response. Regardless of the cause of ARDS, the severity of the inflammatory state and fibroproliferative evolution have been shown to be independent predictors of survival and ventilator dependence. Patients suffering from severe forms of ARDS in fact require prolonged mechanical ventilation, which exposes them to ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and the onset of multiorgan insufficiency. The hyperinflammatory state underlying ARDS predisposes to pulmonary fibroproliferation, which in turn increases susceptibility to ventilator dependence and increases the risk of MOF and death. For this reason, the rationale in the use of anakinra is to limit the inflammatory process of ARDS as early as possible, avoiding the progression of lung damage.
Sepsis-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening acute inflammatory lung injury, associated with increased pulmonary microvascular permeability, increased lung weight, and loss of aerated lung tissue.Despite advances in critical care, no established and targeted treatment for ARDS, contributing to a persistently high mortality rate of 34% to 45%. Therefore, exploring novel therapeutic targets for septic ARDS is of paramount importance.Acetaldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) is a mitochondrial enzyme that serves as the primary toxic aldehyde scavenger and is expressed in various cells, including neutrophils. The ALDH2 rs671 single nucleotide polymorphism, leading to an approximate 90% decrease in ALDH2 enzymatic activity, is implicated in occurrence of macrovascular conditions, such as coronary artery disease, pulmonary arterial hypertension, and aortic aneurysm or dissection.An array of studies has delved into role of ALDH2 in regulating cellular processes, including inflammation, autophagy, apoptosis, necrosis,efferocytosis and pyroptosis.but whether it associated with the incidence of septic-ARDS remains unknown.The aim of this study was to determine whether the ALDH2 rs671 single nucleotide polymorphism was associated with the incidence of septic-ARDS.
Premature babies often need help breathing for a longer period of time. Traditionally, this is done with a breathing aid called NCPAP (nasal continuous positive airway pressure). This treatment is safe and effective, but it is very time-consuming and can sometimes have side effects. In the present research project, the investigators want to find out whether another type of breathing aid called NHF (nasal high flow therapy) is just as effective for stable premature babies. The investigators suspect that NHF is just as effective, but easier to use and more comfortable.
Predicting fluid responsiveness is primordial when caring for patients with circulatory shock as it allows correction of preload-dependent low cardiac output states, while preserving patients of the deleterious effects of excessive fluid resuscitation. Patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) treated with prone positioning (PP) are a specific subset of patients, as 1) they frequently present with shock; 2) excessive fluid administration may lead to respiratory worsening due to increased hydrostatic oedema with potential subsequent worse clinical outcome; and 3) all available dynamic tests evaluating fluid responsiveness can only be performed in patients in the supine condition (which in the case of severe ARDS patients in PP occurs only for 8h over 24h). These elements warrant the development of specific tests allowing the clinician to predict fluid responsiveness with enough exactitude when caring for these patients. We hypothesize that there exists diagnostic heterogeneity in the predictive performance of 4 clinical tests to identify fluid responsiveness in ARDS patients in PP. For the matter of this study, these 4 tests are the Trendelenburg maneuver, the end-expiratory occlusion test, the end-expiratory occlusion test associated with the end-inspiratory occlusion test, and the tidal volume challenge. The diagnostic reference of the study will be the relative change in cardiac index measured by transpulmonary thermodilution before and after a 500 ml fluid bolus, and will allow the adjudication of patients as being fluid responsive or not. The primary objective of the study is to determine the area under the ROC curve of each of the 4 tests, with their respective 95% confidence interval. All enrolled patients will perform the 4 tests following a cross-over design and in a randomized sequence, separated by 1-min wash-out periods with return to hemodynamic baseline values, and concluded with the 500-ml fluid bolus. Patients will only participate once. The expected duration of study participation is 30 minutes maximum.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a diffuse inflammation of the lungs that occurs in a variety of diseases. According to the Berlin definition, ARDS is characterized by diffuse lung damage in patients with predisposing factors. Understanding the physiology of ARDS has led to improved ventilatory management, which must be protective to ensure adequate oxygenation and CO2 clearance. Prone position (PP) is a technique that can reduce mortality in patients with severe ARDS. PP results in a more homogeneous distribution of pulmonary stress and strain, helping to protect the lung against ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). It also increases the PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio, improves the pulmonary ventilation-perfusion ratio, decreases PaCO2 and promotes ventilation of the dorsal lung regions. This technique should be offered to all patients with severe ARDS for 16 consecutive hours, to improve survival and weaning success from mechanical ventilation. However, PP has adverse effects. A meta-analysis showed an increased risk of pressure sores, possibly linked to generalized acute inflammation associated with significant cytokine discharge and diffuse lesions of the vascular endothelium. PP also increased the risk of obstruction and displacement of the endotracheal tube. Final positioning in PP, (i.e., the position imposed on the patient for the duration of the PP session) varies from one ICU to another, and is rarely described in scientific articles. There are two main variants: 1. prone , with arms alongside the body 2. prone, swimmer's position The aim of our study is to show that the "swimmer" PP reduces the occurrence of stage 3 or higher pressure sores, compared with the "arms alongside the body" PP (standard care) at Day 28 post inclusion.
Dyspnea is defined by a subjective sensation of respiratory discomfort, the intensity of which varies according to the terrain, the anamnesis and the cause. Resuscitation is associated with many causes of dyspnea, including initial distress, mechanical ventilation, or after-effects following the pathology and its management. Respiratory distress is the most severe form of impaired lung function. It is the first cause of hospitalization in intensive care. This distress, indicative of the failure of the respiratory system, is always severe and potentially fatal. It therefore constitutes an absolute therapeutic emergency. Dyspnea is often the revealing symptom of the condition and the urgency surrounding its management is an additional factor of concern for the patient. As a result, dyspnea is a pejorative element associated with severity or even death. In patients surviving the initial condition, dyspnea persists and can be found months or even years later, despite the initial rehabilitation. It is strongly associated with anxiety or even the fear of dying and contributes to the occurrence of post-traumatic stress syndromes. This persistent sensation of respiratory discomfort, limiting the patient's autonomy in his activities of daily living, seems to be able to reduce his quality of life. In addition, the perpetuation of this dyspnea could favor a spiral of deconditioning causing a progressive deterioration of the cardio-respiratory system justifying new hospitalizations. In patients with chronic respiratory failure, exercise rehabilitation supervised by hysiotherapists allows, in addition to improving autonomy, a significant reduction in dyspnoea, thus increasing the quality of life of these patients. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the effect at 2 years of 3 modes of management of dyspnea: exercise rehabilitation, standard physiotherapy and "usual care" on post-resuscitation dyspnea in patients with presented with severe COVID-19.
To evaluate the validity of lung ultrasound compared to CT chest and chest radiograph for diagnosis of ARDS and prediction of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation in those patients compared to traditional methods.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common acute and critical disease in clinic. The clinical mortality is as high as 30%-40%. At present, there is no specific treatment. Erythropoietin (EPO), also known as erythrocyte- stimulating factor, erythropoietin, has a certain amount in normal human body, mainly synthesized by liver in infants and kidneys in adults, which can stimulate erythropoiesis. In recent years, more and more studies have shown that high-dose exogenous EPO administration has benefit effects on multi-organ protection. Therefore, we designed this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial for defecting EPO on the alveolar fluid clearance of ARDS. The study mainly answers the following questions: Does human erythropoietin accelerate the resolution of alveolar edema in ARDS? Is there any effect on hospital survival? The study will draw conclusions by comparing the control group with the experimental group.