Ultraslow SWL Versus Slow SWL for Renal Stones With High NCT03795532

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Ultraslow full-power SWL versus slow power-ramping SWL in Renal stones with high attenuation value

To evaluate the efficacy of ultraslow rate of SWL versus slow rate, power ramping SWL for renal stones

Recruitment information / eligibility
Status	Recruiting
Enrollment	124
Est. completion date	June 2019
Est. primary completion date	May 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers	No
Gender	All
Age group	18 Years and older
Eligibility	Inclusion Criteria: - single Renal stone less than or equal to 3 cm (2 cm for lower calyceal stones) - radio-opaque stone - high attenuation value (= 1000 HU) stone Exclusion Criteria: - Abnormal renal anatomy - renal insufficiency - solitary kidney - coagulopathies - uncontrolled hypertension - renal artery or aortic aneurysm - active urinary tract infection - pregnancy - severe skeletal malformations (spinal deformity) precluding proper stone localization - skin to stone distance (SSD) > 11 cm - BMI > 30 Kgm/m2

Procedure:
• SWL
Shock wave lithotripsy

Locations
Country	Name	City	State
Egypt	Beni-Suef Hospitals	Bani Suwayf	Outside U.S./Canada

Sponsors *(2)*
Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Cairo University	Beni-Suef University

Egypt,

Outcome
Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	stone free rate	Complete clearance of stones in addition to clinically insignificant residual fragments	3 months following last session of SWL
Secondary	Complications rate	Comparison of rate of complications in both groups	3 months following last session of SWL

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Not yet recruiting	`NCT03924596` - Treatment of Renal Stones With Frankincense (Luban)	Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed	`NCT03763539` - Ultraslow Full-power SWL Versus Slow Power-ramping SWL in Stones With High Attenuation Value	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04578795` - Effectiveness of Single Use Flexible Ureteroscopes in Treatment of Renal Stones	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04367155` - Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid on Blood Loss During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.	N/A
Completed	`NCT02658942` - Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus ESWL in the Management of Lower Calyceal Stones	N/A
Completed	`NCT02645058` - RIRS Versus ESWL for the Treatment of Renal Stones	N/A
Completed	`NCT06120257` - Management of Lower Pole Renal Hard Stones ≤2 cm	N/A
Completed	`NCT02037906` - Escalating, Constant and Reduction Energy Output in SWL for Renal Stones	N/A
Completed	`NCT05855057` - Effectiveness of US-Guided PCNL Different Positions in Renal Stones Treatment
Completed	`NCT02373384` - The Predictors of Successful Oral Dissolution Therapy in Radiolucent Renal Stones; A Prospective Evaluation	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT06175910` - Postoperative Outcomes of PCNL vs RIRS in Obese Patients With Pelvic 1.5:3 cm Renal Stones	N/A
Completed	`NCT01619735` - "Dusting" Versus "Basketing" - Treatment Of Intrarenal Stones
Completed	`NCT04345835` - Prone Flexed Position in Percutanous Nephrolithotomy	N/A