Safety of a Boost (CXB or EBRT) in Combination With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Early Rectal Adenocarcinoma

Rectal Neoplasms Clinical Trial

— OPERA  

Official title:

European Phase III Study Comparing a Radiation Dose Escalation Using 2 Different Approaches : External Beam Radiation Therapy Versus Endocavitary Radiation Therapy With Contact X-ray Brachytherapy 50 kiloVolts (kV) for Patients With Rectal Adenocarcinoma

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02505750
• Other study ID #: 2014/14
• Secondary ID: 2014-A01851-46
• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Phase: Phase 3
• Start date: June 24, 2015
• Est. completion date: June 2030

Study information

• Verified date: November 2023
• Source: Centre Antoine Lacassagne
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The investigators propose to conduct a randomised study on cT2, cT3a-b tumours less than 5 cm using two different techniques of radiotherapy boost following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) (CAP45): EBRT (9 Gy/5 fractions) or CXB (90 Gy/3 fractions). The endpoint will be organ preservation at 3 years without non-salvageable local pelvic recurrence. The proof of this concept will be of most benefit for all patients but especially for the elderly who usually are not fit for or keen to undergo major surgery. The hypothesis of this study is to determine whether the addition of an endocavitary boost with CXB after standard treatment with nCRT, increases the chance of rectum and anus preservation by 20%-unites in early rectal adenocarcinoma without locally progressive disease (organ preservation in control arm 20%, in experimental arm 40%). Main objective To demonstrate that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in combination with a boost given with CXB (Arm B) is superior to the same neoadjuvant therapy plus a boost with EBRT alone (Arm A) in terms of rectum (organ) preservation without non salvageable local disease at 3 years post treatment start, or permanent deviating stoma. Study Design Open-label, phase III, prospective, multi-centre, international, randomised 1:1, 2 arm study designed to evaluate the efficacy of a CXB boost versus an EBRT boost.

Description:

Rationale - current state of knowledge Current guidelines for cT2-T3 (clinical stage T2 and T3) low and middle rectal cancer recommend radical total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery that may involves permanent stoma or a low anterior resection with sometimes poor bowel function. Randomised trials have shown that neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (nCRT) reduces the risk of local recurrence by more than half. At 3 years, it is close to or below 5% with acceptable toxicity at many centers. On the other hand, it provides no definite improvement in overall survival and does not increase the chances of conservative surgery. Rectal adenocarcinoma is rather radioresistant and the dose required to achieve 50% sterilization is close to 90 grays (Gy), which is a high dose causing toxicities when given with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Among the radiotherapy techniques able to achieve safely such a high dose, Contact X-Ray Brachytherapy 50 Kv (CXB) is an appealing method. The Lyon R96-2 randomised trial using CXB showed an increased clinical complete response (cCR) rate from 2% to 29% and an improvement by 30% the chance of avoiding a permanent stoma (72% vs. 42%). In addition, some patients achieving cCR were able to preserve not only the sphincter but the whole rectum (organ preservation) either after local excision or using only a "watch and wait" strategy. Such a conservative approach is receiving a growing interest all over the world among colorectal cancer specialists. The extensive and pioneering work of Prof. Habr Gama in Brazil is presently considered as a reference for the use chemoradiotherapy and an EBRT boost (total dose 54 Gy/30 f/6 weeks) followed by watch and wait in case of cCR to preserve organ, i.E. to avoid surgery. Research Hypothesis The investigators propose to conduct a randomised study on cT2, cT3a-b tumours less than 5 cm using two different techniques of radiotherapy boost following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) (CAP45): EBRT (9 Gy/5 fractions) or CXB (90 Gy/3 fractions). The endpoint will be organ preservation at 3 years without non-salvageable local pelvic recurrence. The proof of this concept will be of most benefit for all patients but especially for the elderly who usually are not fit for or keen to undergo major surgery. The hypothesis of this study is to determine whether the addition of an endocavitary boost with CXB after standard treatment with nCRT, increases the chance of rectum and anus preservation by 20%-unites in early rectal adenocarcinoma without locally progressive disease (organ preservation in control arm 20%, in experimental arm 40%). Main objective To demonstrate that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in combination with a boost given with CXB (Arm B) is superior to the same neoadjuvant therapy plus a boost with EBRT alone (Arm A) in terms of rectum (organ) preservation without non salvageable local disease at 3 years post treatment start, or permanent deviating stoma. Study Design Open-label, phase III, prospective, multi-centre, international, randomised 1:1, 2 arm study designed to evaluate the efficacy of a CXB boost versus an EBRT boost. Randomisation: Arm A: 3D conformal EBRT 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction/5 weeks) with concurrent chemotherapy using capecitabine (825 mg/m2 bid, on radiation days). A cone down EBRT targeting the Gross Tumour Volume (GTV) will deliver a boost dose of 9 Gy in 5 fractions. On week 14 after the start of treatment, the tumour response evaluation will guide the final strategy: surgery (radical TME or local excision) or watch-and-wait (W-W). Arm B divided in 2 subgroups depending on the tumour diameter: B1: If the tumour is < 3 cm, a CXB boost dose (90Gy/3 fractions/4 weeks) will be initially delivered to the tumour. After 2 weeks rest, patients will receive 3D conformal EBRT 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction/5 weeks) with concurrent chemotherapy using capecitabine (825 mg/m2 bid, on radiation days). Clinical evaluation will be performed 3 weeks after the end of irradiation (week 14) and will guide the final strategy (surgery or W-W) as in arm A. B2: If the tumour is ≥ 3 cm, patients will receive EBRT first 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction/5 weeks) with concurrent chemotherapy using capecitabine (825 mg/m2 bid, on radiation days). A CXB boost dose (90 Gy/3 fractions/4 weeks) will be delivered to residual tumour, after a rest of 2 weeks. On week 14 after the start of treatment, the tumour response evaluation will guide the final strategy (surgery or W-W) as in arm A. Adjuvant chemotherapy will be left to institution choice. Number of subjects: Taking alpha=5% and bêta=7.5% with 10% patients not evaluable after randomisation, 236 patients (118 patients/arm) must be enrolled to show a 50% increase in the main endpoint at 3 years (from 20% to 40%).This study will show a hazard ratio of 0.56. Stopping rule: non-salvageable local recurrence rate > 10% checked by the independent Data Monitoring Committee every 80 patients.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Enrollment: 236
• Est. completion date: June 2030
• Est. primary completion date: June 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Adenocarcinoma of the rectum classified clinically T2, T3a, T3b (penetration in the mesorectal fat between 1 to 5 mm) by TNM classification (Tumour Node Metastase), < 5 cm largest diameter, < half rectal circumference (by MRI staging), N0-N1 (any node < 8 mm diameter on MRI), M0

2. Operable patient

3. Tumour accessible to endocavitary contact X-Ray Brachytherapy with a distance from the lower tumour border to the anal verge = 10cm

4. 18 years or above

5. No comorbidity preventing treatment

6. Adequate birth control

7. Patient having read the information note and having signed the informed consent

8. Health care insurance available

9. Follow-up possible

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Inoperable patient

2. T1, T3cd, T4, T= 5cm, T= ½ circumference

3. Patient N2 at diagnosis or N1 with any node > 8 mm diameter

4. Patient presenting metastasis at diagnosis

5. Previous pelvic irradiation

6. Tumour with extramural vascular invasion

7. Simultaneous progressive cancer

8. Tumour invading external anal sphincter and within 1 mm, and the levator muscle

9. Patient unable to receive CXB or CRT

10. Tumour with poor differentiation (G3)

11. People particularly vulnerable as defined in Articles L.1121-5 to -8 of the French Healthcare Code, including: person deprived of freedom by an administrative or judicial decision, adult being the object of a legal protection measure or outside state to express their consent, pregnant or breastfeeding women

12. Any significant concurrent medical illness that in the opinion of the investigator would preclude protocol therapy

13. Patient with history of poor compliance or current or past psychiatric conditions or severe acute or chronic medical conditions that would interfere with the ability to comply with the study protocol

14. Concurrent enrolment in another clinical trial using an investigational anti-cancer treatment within 28 days prior to the first dose of study treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Adenocarcinoma
• Rectal Neoplasms

Intervention

Radiation:
• 3D conformal EBRT
External Beam Radiation Therapy

Device:
• Contact X-ray brachytherapy 50 kV

Drug:
• Capecitabine

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Denmark	Aarhus University Hospital	Aarhus
France	Centre Léon Bérard	Lyon
France	Hospices Civils de Lyon - Hôpital de la Croix Rousse	Lyon
France	Centre d'oncologie et de radiothérapie Mâcon	Mâcon
France	Hôpital La Timone - AP-HM	Marseille
France	Institut Paoli Calmette	Marseille
France	Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie	Mougins
France	Centre Antoine Lacassagne	Nice
France	Centre de Haute Energie	Nice
France	Hospices Civils de Lyon - Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud	Pierre Bénite
France	Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth	Saint-Priest en Jarez
France	Clinique Charcot	Sainte Foy-Lès-Lyon
France	Hôpital de la Croix Rouge Française - Centre de Radiothérapie St Louis	Toulon
France	Centre de radiothérapie Bayard	Villeurbanne
Sweden	Karolinska Institute	Stockholm
Sweden	University of Uppsala	Uppsala
United Kingdom	Royal Surrey County Hospital	Guildford
United Kingdom	Spire Hull and East Riding Hospital	Hull
United Kingdom	Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust	Liverpool
United Kingdom	University Hospital	Nottingham

Sponsors (19)

Lead Sponsor

Collaborator

Centre Antoine Lacassagne

Aarhus University Hospital, Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Centre de Haute Energie, Centre de radiothérapie Bayard, Centre Leon Berard, Centre Oncologie Radiothérapie de Mâcon, Clinique Charcot, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hôpital de la Timone, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Karolinska Institutet, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Spire Hull and East Riding Hospital, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Uppsala University Hospital

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

Denmark,  France,  Sweden,  United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Rate of sphincter conservation		3 years post treatment
Other	Treatment toxicity	Early and late toxicity by National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v4.0.	3 years post treatment
Other	Bowel function	Bowel function by modified Low Anterior Resection Score (LARS)	3 years post treatment
Other	Quality of Life	Quality of life questionnaire (QLQ): QLQ-C30 and colorectal (CR) QLQ-CR29 questionnaires	3 years post treatment
Primary	Rate of rectum preservation either with local excision or watch and wait strategy after neoadjuvant treatment without non salvageable locally progressive disease at 3 years post treatment, or permanent stoma.	The primary analysis will take place when approximately 138 events have occurred.; The evaluation of the rate of rectum preservation without progressive local disease at 3 years will be performed using a Log rank test stratified by center.	3 years post treatment
Secondary	Clinical Complete Response (assessed by digital rectal examination, endoscopy with photos and MRI)		Week 14
Secondary	Overall Survival	Time between date of randomisation and date of death due to any causes. Patients who were not reported as having died at the time of the study will be censored at the date they were last known to be alive	3 years post treatment
Secondary	Disease-free survival	Time between date of randomisation to time of recurrence, either local or distant metastasis or death due to any cause). Patients without an event will be censored at last date the patient was known to be disease-free. Recurrence of rectal cancer will be based on tumour assessment made by investigator	3 years post treatment
Secondary	Tumour regression score on the operative specimen		week 24