View clinical trials related to Rectal Neoplasms.
Filter by:This early phase I trial studies how well heated intra-peritoneal chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cisplatin work for the treatment of abdominal or pelvic tumors that can be removed by surgery (resectable), does not respond to treatment (refractory), or has come back (recurrent). Heated intra-peritoneal chemotherapy is a procedure performed in combination with abdominal surgery for cancer that has spread to the abdomen. It involves the infusion of a heated chemotherapy solution that circulates into the abdominal cavity. Chemotherapy drugs, such as doxorubicin and cisplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Heating a chemotherapy solution and infusing it directly into the abdomen may kill more cells.
Background Recent novel surgical techniques for resection of low rectal cancer have been introduced and these approaches have the potential to overcome anatomical limitations like obesity, narrow male pelvis and bulky and low tumours. Two of these procedures are robotic low anterior resection (RLAR) and transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Both approaches have distinct advantages and limitations however there have been no head to head trial comparing RLAR and TaTME for patients with mid to low rectal cancer undergoing surgery by experienced surgeons. Previous studies looking at the oncological outcomes of either TaTME or robotic TME included many centres where the surgeons were on a learning curve and hence the true oncological outcomes and clinical benefits cannot be measured accurately. The primary objective of this pilot study is to conduct a multicentre prospective trial to investigate clinical outcomes, in particular disease free survival (DFS) in patients undergoing RLAR and TaTME. The additional goal is to investigate other efficacy measures, complications rates, recruitment feasibility and protocol refinement. Method This pilot study will be a prospective, observational, case-matched, two -cohort, multicentre designed to investigate the oncological and clinical outcomes of patients with mid-to-low, non-metastatic rectal cancer undergoing low anterior resection (LAR) using robot-assisted surgery ( RLAR), or transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). The inclusion criteria consist of experienced surgeons defined as 60 prior procedures with RLAR or TaTME to meet the enrolment criteria for the RLAR and TaTME arm, respectively. Successful oncological and clinical outcomes are defined as circumferential resection margin (CRM) ≥1 mm with minimal postoperative morbidity (absence of Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV complications within 30 days after surgery). Local and distal recurrence rates with DFS over 3 years will be measured as primary outcome. Secondary and exploratory endpoints will include length of hospital stay, intraoperative time, intraoperative blood loss, harvested lymph nodes, distal resection margin, incompleteness of mesorectum, CRM involvement, unplanned conversion rates, 30-days postoperative complications and overall recurrence rate. The Quality of life assessment questionnaires will be performed preoperatively, 6 months and 12 months after reversal of ileostomy. Propensity score matching will be used to minimize bias from the nonrandomized treatment assignment. The RLAR and TaTME cohorts will be matched by propensity scores accounting for factors significantly associated with either undergoing robotic surgery or TaTME occurrence on logistic regression analysis. Ethics and Dissemination The medical ethical committees of all the participating countries will be involved in approving the study protocol. Results of the primary and secondary end points will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.
The MA-PPING is a multicenter prospective observational study that includes patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. The study aims to map the oral and gut microbiome of patients diagnosed with pancreatic, esophageal or colorectal cancer during their surgical patient journey from the moment of diagnosis until full recovery (three months after surgery).
Seamless phase I/II trial with phase I part for determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Trifluridine/tipiracil, followed by a randomized phase II trial (randomization ratio 2:1) with an experimental arm with Trifluridine/tipiracil based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and a standard - calibration arm (internal control) with capecitabine CRT flanked by translational research in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer
Background: Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) may cause various surgical complications including disruption of perineal wound, perineal hernia and adhesive small-bowel obstruction. Pelvic peritoneum reconstruction could prevent those complications, but it may not always be achievable, especially in patients with severe pelvic fibrosis after neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Previous study has reported the application of the pelvic peritoneum reconstruction using the bladder peritoneum flap in laparoscopic ELAPE. The aim of the study is to evaluate the short-term clinical, technical and safety outcomes of pelvic peritoneum reconstruction using the bladder peritoneum flap in laparoscopic ELAPE. Methods/Design: This is a single -center prospective cohort study and fulfill the IDEAL 2A stage principle. Rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant radiotherapy and about to undergo laparoscopic ELAPE will be included. Main exclusion criteria are being complicated with urgent complications, ASA grade > 3 and accompanied with mental illness. Patients suffering rigid pelvis or huge perineal peritoneum defect, and having difficulty in primary perineal wound closure will be considered eligible for the baldder peritoneum flap (BPF) group; corresponding rectal cancer patients will be allocated to the control group. After informed consent, 10 patients are planned to be included in the BPF group. Standard laparoscopic ELAPE with pelvic peritoneal floor reconstruction using BPF are to be performed. The surgical safety is to be evaluated after one-year follow-up. Primary endpoints are the occurrence of intraoperative and postoperative complications of pelvic peritoneum reconstruction after ELAPE. Second endpoints are overall complication rate within 30 days after surgery, extent of small intestine falling down to pelvic cavity, and other follow-up consequences within 1 year after surgery.
Extramural Vascular Invasion Positive(EMVI+) is a high risk of distant metastasis for locally advanced rectal cancer(LARC) after resection. The study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mFOLFOXIRI as neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for EMVI+ LARC.
Randomized clinical trial of multimodal prehabilitation in vulnerable patients with colon or rectal cancer prior to surgery.
This phase Ib trial studies side effects and best dose of dasatinib in preventing oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with gastrointestinal cancers who are receiving FOLFOX regimen with or without bevacizumab. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX regimen), work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. However, the buildup of oxaliplatin in the cranial nerves can result in damage or the nerves. Dasatinib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Blocking these enzymes may reduce oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy.
The prevalence of malnutrition is common among patients with colorectal cancer. Chemotherapy induced side effects may impact negatively on nutrition intake thus increase the risk of malnutrition and serious complications for patients. Purpose is to test the effect of empowering education on activation and knowledge level among patients with colorectal cancer during the chemotherapy. Secondary outcomes are quality of life and malnutrition. A two-arm, single center, patient blinded superiority trial with stratified randomization (1:1) and with repeated measures is used to measure the effectiveness of face-to-face education on nutrition intake related chemotherapy induced side-effects' self-care compared to standard care. Eligibility criteria are adult patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer and receiving intra venous chemotherapy treatment. Patients are recruited in one university hospital outpatient clinic in Finland. Experienced oncology nurse delivers the intervention two weeks after the first chemotherapy. Primary outcomes are activation in self-care and knowledge level. Secondary outcomes are quality of life and risk of malnutrition measured at baseline (M0) and after eight (M1) and 16 weeks (M2) after the intervention. The study will provide knowledge of nurse-led educational intervention on self-care among patients with colorectal cancer. The findings will contribute to patient education and self-care, thus better quality of life.
The use of the novel recently introduced PET/MR scanner is believed to be promising in RC management, providing great anatomical details and detailed metabolic characterization. Preliminary data indicate it may become a strong imaging modality for staging of RC and has the potential to be used as a predictive tool guiding individualized therapy in patients receiving nT, but confirmation on prospective studies is mandatory. The use of radiomics as analysis approach may assist in achieving a better understanding of the obtained image data, and thus a more accurate disease assessment. Objectives 1. To preliminary assess the potential diagnostic value of single PET/MR scan in RC staging and compare it to that of MRI alone, PET/CT alone, and combined MRI and PET/CT. 2. To preliminary assess the potential value of PET/MR in predicting pMR to nT. 3. To use radiomics analysis of PET/MR data to develop a quantification clinical tools that allow a more accurate and comprehensive assessment of RC patients.