View clinical trials related to Rectal Neoplasms.
Filter by:This study is designed to investigate whether or not the use of a customized vacuum immobilization device (CVID) to immobilize rectal cancer patients undergoing preoperative pelvic radiation therapy improves the positional stability of patients during each radiation treatment. This question is more relevant now in the era of image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT). Using state of the art IGRT technologies such as cone beam CT (CBCT) scanning, assessments of the accuracy of treatment delivery can be made during a course of radiation therapy allowing for patient set-up corrective strategies to be implemented. The use of CBCT scanning may minimize any potential benefit of of a CVID if the patient's pretreatment position can be corrected prior to treatment and our current immobilization strategy results in a stable patient position. While it is seemingly intuitive to assume that the use of CVID results in better patient stability, there is actually little data to support this.
RATIONALE: Sunitinib malate may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth and by blocking blood flow to the tumor. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as irinotecan hydrochloride, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) together with sunitinib malate may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well giving sunitinib malate together with combination chemotherapy works as front-line therapy in treating patients with metastatic rectal cancer that cannot be removed by surgery.
This is a single arm phase II trial with combined celecoxib, tegafur-uracil, folinate and preoperative radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The primary end point is pathological complete response (pCR) rate. The secondary endpoints are toxicities of combined celecoxib and chemoradiation, negative resection margin rate, clinical tumor response by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), sphincter preservation rate, disease-free survival and overall survival.
The investigators would like to test the safety and efficacy of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in rectal cancer using the Photon Radiosurgery System (PRS).
Total mesorectal excision (TME) is a rather new operation technique in the treatment of rectal cancer. It is known to reduce the rate of local recurrences. However, the influence on long-term survival is unclear.
Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) is recommended to many patients with localised rectal cancer, not previously treated with pelvic RT. However, the optimum fractionation, the timing of surgery and the best use of concomitant chemotherapy remains controversial. There are theoretical reasons to believe that radiotherapy given in larger fractions during a shorter period of time might result in more late side effects than giving a conventional, more protracted RT in patients with rectal cancer. In addition, the optimum timing of surgery after RT, with respect to postoperative morbidity, mortality and potential downsizing of the tumour is not known. To address these questions, a prospective randomized multicenter trial was initiated, the Stockholm III trial, in which patients with primarily resectable rectal cancer were randomized to short-course preoperative RT (5x5 Gy) followed by surgery within one week or after 4-8 weeks or long-course preoperative RT(25x2 Gy) followed by surgery after 4-8 weeks.
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as capecitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Sorafenib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth and by blocking blood flow to the tumor. Giving radiation therapy together with capecitabine and sorafenib before surgery may make the tumor smaller and reduce the amount of normal tissue that needs to be removed. PURPOSE: This phase I/II trial is studying the side effects and best dose of capecitabine when given together with sorafenib and external-beam radiation therapy and to see how well it works in treating patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
A double center study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Aer-O-Scope in traveling through the colon in low risk subjects.
This study will assess the efficacy and safety of two different neoadjuvant treatment approaches including bevacizumab in newly diagnosed participants with high risk locally advanced rectal cancer. Participants will be randomized into one of two treatment arms (Arm A or Arm B).
Treatment for locally-advanced rectal adenocarcinoma includes preoperative radiochemotherapy before surgery with total mesorectal excision in order to reduce tumor infiltration, facilitate oncologic surgery and improve survival. About fifty percent of these patients are good responders i.e. their tumor infiltration reduces in the rectal wall and regional lymph nodes in order to be graded ypT0 to T2 N0 after pathologic assessment (so called downstaging). At the opposite, bad responders (ypT3-4 and/or N+) are not sensitive to standard preoperative radiochemotherapy, and their survival is poor than good responders. Until now, response to preoperative radiochemotherapy cannot be anticipated before pathological assessment of surgical specimen. Proteomic analysis of sera from good and bad responders to preoperative radiochemotherapy could allow identification of early biomarkers of tumor response, and subsequently adaptation of treatment to increase preoperative treatment efficiency and survival in most patients.