Rectal Cancer Clinical Trial
— TreatableOfficial title:
Towards Personalized Care Pathways for Bowel Symptoms in Rectal Cancer Patients Through Precision Medicine
Colorectal cancer is the 2nd and 3rd most common cancer in respectively women and men, of which about 40% is located in the rectum. The gold standard treatment for rectal cancer (RC) is a low anterior resection, combined with chemoradiotherapy. However, this treatment will negatively impact different aspects of bowel function and the patients' quality of life. These bowel symptoms often remain prevalent, even at 12 months after RC treatment. Most assessment tools are however not capable of capturing the full range or therapeutic-related evolution of these bowel symptoms. Consequently, the aim is to develop a validated bowel diary for diagnosing and evaluation of all bowel symptoms.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 118 |
Est. completion date | March 2026 |
Est. primary completion date | October 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Voluntary written informed consent of the participant or their legally authorized representative has been obtained prior to any screening procedures. - At least 18 years of age at the time of signing the Informed Consent Form (ICF). - Proficient in reading, comprehending, and conversing in Dutch . - Patients diagnosed with a rectal tumour based on a pathology report. Exclusion Criteria: - The participant has undergone a different type of surgery, including a Hartmann procedure, abdominoperineal excision, transanal endoscopic microsurgery, or sigmoid resection. - Experienced fecal incontinence prior to undergoing surgery. - Are affected by neurological disorders affecting bowel function. - Already underwent previous pelvic surgery, previous pelvic radiation or rectal surgery for non-cancer reasons. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
KU Leuven | Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven |
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Selection of items for the newly developed bowel diary | The selection of items for a comprehensive bowel diary in patients with rectal cancer is based on a literature review, a patient focus group and an international Delphi survey. The patient focus group is recorded using an audio and video recording. This recording is transcribed verbatim by the researcher into a Word document. The transcription will be analyzed using NVIVO 9 software. In this Delphi survey, a multidisciplinary group of experts will score each item of the long list on a 1-9-point Likert scale from 'Not relevant' (1) to 'Essential' (9) for inclusion in the bowel diary. Finally, a patient consultation meeting and a consensus meeting will be held for the participants who completed the Delphi survey. | 12 months | |
Primary | Assessment of content validity of the newly developed bowel diary in a post-Delphi patient focus group consisting of 8-12 participants | Content validation of the newly developed bowel diary will be tested during interview in the post-Delphi patient focus group. This focus group is recorded using an audio and video recording. This recording are transcribed verbatim by the researcher into a Word document. The transcription will be analyzed using NVIVO 9 software. | 12 months | |
Primary | The usability of the newly developed e-diary, assessed with the System Usability Scale (SUS) in patients after rectal surgery for rectal cancer | The participants will be asked to use a newly developed electronic bowel diary for 7 consecutive days. This bowel diary will be available on the smartphone in the form of an application. After 7 days, the usability of this e-diary will be assessed with the System Usability Scale (SUS). The SUS is a questionnaire consisting of 10 items, utilizing a 5-point Likert scale to measure users' perceived satisfaction with the system. It includes two subscales focusing on usability and learnability. Scores on the SUS range from 0 to 100, with no direct correlation to percentiles (i.e., a score of 60 does not signify a usability level of 60%). Instead, a score of 70 points or higher is commonly employed as an initial threshold indicating acceptable usability. This benchmark is derived from the overall mean of more than 200 studies covering various systems and products. | 12 months | |
Primary | The usability of the newly developed e-diary will be evaluated through conversations with patients who have undergone rectal surgery for rectal cancer, after these patients have used the e-diary for seven consecutive days | Participants will be instructed to use a newly developed electronic bowel diary via a smartphone app for seven consecutive days. The research will then conduct conversations with the participants covering aspects such as complexity, the need for additional support, application coherence, user-friendliness, pre-existing knowledge requirements, and suggestions for improvement. Audio and video recordings of these conversations will be transferred to the researcher's computer and subsequently transcribed into a Word document. The transcriptions will be analyzed using NVIVO 9 software. | 12 months | |
Primary | Construct validity of the newly developed bowel e-diary | For the determination of the construct validity, published literature will be used to generate hypotheses regarding bowel symptoms after RC treatment. The responses recorded in the e-diaries by participants, who diligently maintained entries for a continuous period of 7 days, will be systematically analyzed and compared against the formulated hypotheses. | 12 months | |
Primary | Criterion validity of the newly developed bowel e-diary | Criterion validity will be measured in patients, comparing the relationship between the newly developed e-diary and an accepted current measure (e.g. LARS score). The participants will be asked to use the newly developed electronic bowel diary for 7 consecutive days. | 12 months | |
Primary | Test-retest reliability of the newly developed bowel e-diary | To investigate the test-retest reliability of the newly developed bowel e-diary, patients will have to fill out the bowel diary application twice, each time for a continuous period of 7 days, during a period when the disorder and treatment do not change (i.e., after the end of adjuvant treatment and/or after closure of an eventual temporary postoperative ileostomy). | 12 months | |
Primary | Responsiveness of the newly developed bowel e-diary in patients after rectal surgery for rectal cancer. The newly validated e-diary is the primary outcome. | To evaluate the responsiveness of the new bowel e-diary, which measures its ability to detect actual changes over an anticipated time frame (before and after treatment), patients scheduled for specific treatments (sacral nerve stimulation/ondansetron) will be asked to use the e-diary twice. This involves recording entries before and two weeks after the treatment, each for a continuous period of 7 days. | 12 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06380101 -
Evaluating a Nonessential Amino Acid Restriction (NEAAR) Medical Food With Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (LARC)
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05551052 -
CRC Detection Reliable Assessment With Blood
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04323722 -
Impact of Bladder Depletion on Mesorectal Movements During Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06006390 -
CEA Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Lymphocytes (CAR-T) in the Treatment of CEA Positive Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04088955 -
A Digimed Oncology PharmacoTherapy Registry
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01347697 -
Collagen Implant (Biological Mesh) Versus GM Flap for Reconstruction of Pelvic Floor After ELAPE in Rectal Cancer
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04495088 -
Preoperative FOLFOX Versus Postoperative Risk-adapted Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
|
Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03007771 -
Magnetic Resonance-guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MR-HIFU) Used for Mild Hyperthermia
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT01347645 -
Irinotecan Plus E7820 Versus FOLFIRI in Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Colon or Rectal Cancer
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03520088 -
PROSPECTIVE CONTROLLED AND RANDOMIZED STUDY OF THE GENITOURINARY FUNCTION AFTER RECTAL CANCER SURGERY IN RELATION TO THE DISSECTION OF THE INFERIOR MESENTERIC VESSELS
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05556473 -
F-Tryptophan PET/CT in Human Cancers
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04749381 -
The Role of TCM on ERAS of Rectal Cancer Patients
|
Phase 2 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05028192 -
Mitochondria Preservation by Exercise Training: a Targeted Therapy for Cancer and Chemotherapy-induced Cachexia
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03283540 -
Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer on Anal Physiology + Fecal Incontinence
|
||
Completed |
NCT04534309 -
Behavioral Weight Loss Program for Cancer Survivors in Maryland
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05914766 -
An Informational and Supportive Care Intervention for Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04852653 -
A Prospective Feasibility Study Evaluating Extracellular Vesicles Obtained by Liquid Biopsy for Neoadjuvant Treatment Response Assessment in Rectal Cancer
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03190941 -
Administering Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes Transduced With a Murine T-Cell Receptor Recognizing the G12V Variant of Mutated RAS in HLA-A*11:01 Patients
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT02933944 -
Exploratory Study of TG02-treatment as Monotherapy or in Combination With Pembrolizumab to Assess Safety and Immune Activation in Patients With Locally Advanced Primary and Recurrent Oncogenic RAS Exon 2 Mutant Colorectal Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02810652 -
Perioperative Geriatrics Intervention for Older Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection
|
N/A |