View clinical trials related to Rectal Cancer.
Filter by:Surgery is the most indicated curative treatment for rectal cancer when disease is diagnosed early, however local recurrence risk increases when the disease is diagnosed at advanced stage.T1-2 tumors have a recurrence rate lower than 10%, while T3N0 tumors have 15% - 35% and positive lymph nodes T3-4 45% to 67% of recurrence rate within 5 years. These data indicate that patient who have a high risk of tumor recurrence should receive an adjuvant therapy treatment. It is possible that adjuvant chemotherapy has a positive impact on survival of patients already treated with neoadjuvant combination therapy. However it is necessary to identify those patients that might have this benefit. An exploratory analysis of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 22921 study showed that the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy has benefited only the group of patients who had a reduction of tumor stage to ypT0-2. In the group who had no reduction (ypT3-4), there was no benefit. Retrospective analyzes suggest that the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is a predictor of prognosis and even benefit to adjuvant chemotherapy. However the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with rectal cancer remains controversial. Therefore, a randomized trial is needed to answer this question. Based on these data the investigators proposed a phase III study, randomized, unblinded, adjuvant chemotherapy based on Fluorouracil(5-FU) and Oxaliplatin versus observation in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma T3-4, N0-1, M0 previously treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and who did not presented complete response. The investigator believes that this subgroup of patients, who have not achieved complete response, will be benefit from adjuvant therapy. Study objective: The main objective of this study is verify if adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU and oxaliplatin, for 4 months, increases recurrence-free survival versus the observation. Secondary objectives include the evaluation of toxicity, overall survival and assessment of biomarkers (study protocol separately). The study's primary endpoint is disease-free survival (DFS) to be defined as time from randomization to radiological detection of distant disease and / or locoregional recurrence. Isolate carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) increase will not be consider as recurrence until a new measurable lesion be found. NOTE: The TNM system is based on the size and/or extent (reach) of the primary tumor (T), the amount of spread to nearby lymph nodes (N), and the presence of metastasis (M) or secondary tumors formed by the spread of cancer cells to other parts of the body.
Objective tumour response rate to FOLFOXIRI to pre-operative therapy.
The purpose of this study is evaluation of the safety and the efficacy of transanal total mesorectal excision.
Rationale: Approximately 800 abdominoperineal resections (APR) are performed for rectal cancer each year in the Netherlands. The extralevator approach (eAPR) reduces the rate of positive margins and improves oncological outcome in distal rectal cancer. However, wider excisions increase wound healing problems and development of perineal hernia. This has resulted in a progressive increase of the use of musculocutaneous flaps and biological meshes associated with a substantial increase of costs, which is not supported by proper data. Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the cost-effectiveness of pelvic floor reconstruction using a biological mesh after standardized eAPR with neo-adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy. Study design: This is a multicenter study in which patients undergoing an eAPR are randomized between standard care using primary closure of the perineum and the experimental arm with assisted closure using a biological mesh. Study population: Patients with a clinical diagnosis of primary rectal cancer who are scheduled for eAPR after neo-adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy. A total number of 104 patients will be randomized. Intervention: The intervention in the experimental arm consists of suturing a biological mesh derived from porcine dermis in the pelvic floor defect, followed by perineal closure similar to the control arm. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint is the percentage of uncomplicated perineal wound healing (Souphampton wound score less than II at day 30). Secondary endpoints are hospital stay, incidence of perineal hernia, quality of life, and costs. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Both primary perineal closure and biological mesh assisted closure are being performed in daily clinical practise. The potential benefit resulting from participation of the study in patients randomized for biological mesh assisted closure may be a higher chance of uncomplicated perineal wound healing and lower perineal hernia rate. On the other hand, the use of a biological mesh has been associated with increased postoperative pain and seroma formation.
Radical treatment of primary rectal cancer with synchronous distant metastases includes surgical resection of primary and metastatic lesion. However, primary rectal cancer in case of metastasized disease are often locally advanced disease and need downsizing before surgery. It is reported that pelvic recurrence rates and distant metastasis rates outside liver are 30~35% and 60%, respectively. Therefore, combined treatment with radiotherapy and chemotherapy is used. However, the sequence of treatment modalities is not yet definitely established and preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection is accepted as an option of treatment. Conventional long course chemoradiotherapy delays administration of full-dose chemotherapy, and metastatic lesion can be progressed during chemoradiotherapy. In present study, we evaluate the efficacy of short course radiotherapy (SCRT) followed by full-dose chemotherapy with delayed surgical resection of the primary tumor and metastases.
The investigators hypothesize that individuals who receive a personalized 4 week prehabilitation program consisting of exercise and nutrition counselling with post-workout whey protein supplementation will show, before colorectal surgery, improved insulin sensitivity, inflammatory profile, and substrate utilization compared to baseline measures. These results will translate into a higher functional capacity before surgery as demonstrated by an improvement in 6-minute walking test.
Patients' ability to tolerate surgery is associated with physical fitness: less fit patients have an increased rate of death and serious complications following major surgery. Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy (x-rays) prior to rectal cancer surgery is known as neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) and is associated with improved cancer removal but adversely affects physical fitness. In Liverpool, the investigators have pre-pilot data showing that NACRT reduces objectively measured physical fitness (measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing) in patients having surgery. This pre-pilot study investigated the effects of a 6-week structured responsive endurance training programme (SRETP) after NACRT and before cancer surgery. This programme has improved both their fitness and their health related quality of life(HRQL). Now, the investigators are undertaking a randomised controlled trial to compare changes in patient's physical fitness in response to SRETP with a group of patients who will be given exercise advice. The SRETP group will exercise 3 times a week for 9 weeks. The investigators will make objective measurements of physical fitness in both groups. The investigators will monitor patient's perceptions of the training programme, HRQL, daily activity (using an accelerometer), and outcomes after surgery. The investigators believe that, patients in the exercise group will improve their physical fitness prior to surgery, change behaviour towards exercise, improve activity and HRQL following NACRT. These results will contribute to the design of a large, multi-centre trial to determine whether a SRETP increases physical fitness with a reduction in adverse outcome following surgery. The investigators will conduct an adequately powered randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing a SRETP with 'exercise advice' in 46 rectal cancer patients. Specifically, we will test the following hypotheses and outcomes: PRIMARY HYPOTHESIS A 9-week, structured responsive endurance training programme (SRETP) compared with a control group (no training) will result in a clinically significant difference in physical fitness (2.0ml/kg/min VO2 at LT) post-NACRT prior to surgery. SECONDARY OUTCOMES 1. A 9-week SRETP compared with a control group (no training) will result in a clinically significant difference in physical fitness (2.0ml/kg/min VO2Peak) in patients who have had NACRT prior to surgery. 2. SRETP following NACRT and prior to cancer surgery will provide psychological health benefits and improve patient's HRQL (assessed by semi-structured interviews and questionnaires -EORTC QLQ-30 and EQ-5D). This will provide vital exploratory information that will inform a future application to deliver a larger appropriately powered RCT exploring the hypothesis that patients with greater pre-operative fitness will encounter lower postoperative morbidity and mortality. Specifically, these exploratory outcomes are: EXPLORATORY OUTCOMES 1. To investigate whether SRETP following NACRT and prior to surgery is associated with a change in overall physical activity (assessed by the number of steps while active using an accelerometer). 2. To investigate whether there is a change in the day 7 surgical morbidity (using the Post-Operative Morbidity Survey) and mortality. 3. The effect of SRETP on cancer downstaging post-NACRT (Tumour, Node and Metastasis Staging-TNM staging).
The purpose of this project is to implement and evaluate an intervention to increase and sustain rates of use of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among men and women aged 50 and older in 6 intervention counties in Appalachia Ohio. Researchers will employ community-based participatory research (CBPR) in combination with two CRC interventions that have been developed and piloted with community partners to improve CRC screening
45 patients undergoing a colon (large bowel/intestine)removal operation for the diagnosis of colon cancer will be included in this study. During colon operation the affected portion of the colon is removed. In addition, lymph nodes are included in the specimen and evaluated by a pathologist. Analysis of the lymph nodes in the specimen are important because this is an important aspect of determining the stage of the cancer. Once the standard technique is used for the colon removal operation and the specimen is removed it will be injected with two drugs to help identify the lymph nodes. One is a blue dye and the other a radiotracer. The colon and ALL of the lymph nodes will then be sent for the standard pathologic evaluation. The patient themselves will never be injected with these drugs being used for research. Following the standard lymph node evaluation, an additional pathologist at an outside research facility will further examine the lymph nodes in the specimen using more in depth techniques which are above and beyond the standard of care. The results of all the pathologic tests will be conveyed to the surgeon of record to help in their decision making regarding further treatment. The study hypothesis is that radiotracer will be at least as effective as blue dye in identifying the lymph nodes most likely to harbor cancer cells (sentinel nodes). Once identified, these sentinel nodes can then undergo a more in depth review leading to improved staging of colorectal cancer and more accurate treatment.
This innovative study will involve the use of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy, a new medical imaging technology never used for surgical indications to date. Virtual biopsies (pCLE images) will be compared to histopathology analysis. This study focuses on the evaluation of rectal tumor margins. The hypothesis is that pCLE will allow identification of rectal tumor margin, comparable to that of histopathology. In the future, decision of resection margin could rely on intraoperative pCLE exam. The proposed study is a feasibility study, first in the indication of rectal cancer.