View clinical trials related to Rectal Cancer.
Filter by:Elaboration of a preoperative prediction model of the quality of the mesorectum and the involvement of the circumferential margin in patients with mid-low rectal cancer who undergo laparoscopic anterior rectal resection. In a second phase the investigators will study the utility of the prediction model in classifying patients with high risk of suboptimal quality of mesorectum and/or positive circumferential margin. Patients with high preoperative risk will undergo a transanal total mesorectal excision and patients with low risk a laparoscopic transabdominal mesorectal excision. The investigators finally will compare pathological outcomes ( quality of mesorectum and circumferential margin), survival and recurrence between the two groups.
This study is being done to look at the safety and response to the investigational drug durvalumab (MEDI4736) following chemo-radiation therapy for patients with MSS stage II to IV rectal cancer. Durvalumab recognizes specific proteins on the surface of cancer cells and triggers the immune system to destroy the cancer cells. The chemoRT portion of the treatment will be completed just before the course of durvalumab is initiated. In order to learn more about certain characteristics of rectal cancer tumors, this study includes special research tests using samples from diagnostic tumors, a tissue sample from tumors removed during surgery, fresh tumor samples from an area where the cancer has recurred, and blood samples.
This study includes patients affected by advanced and resectable rectal adenocarcinoma. It provides an induction chemotherapy with FOLFOXIRI regimen plus Bevacizumab followed by Chemoradiotherapy plus Bevacizumab. Surgery with total mesorectal incision must be performed within 7-9 weeks after this last treatment. The protocol will be evaluate the disease free survival at two years. Translational analyses will be performed to show the presence of VEGF polymorphism, CD133 surface markers on colorectal CSCs.
This study is designed to investigate if aerobic exercise during and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) can improve outcomes for rectal cancer patients.
CSAR Trial's aim is to determine whether the transverse coloplasty pouch or the side-to-end anastomosis as rectal reservoir reconstruction offers the best functional results.
In recent years the concept of organ sparing treatment in rectal cancer was introduced for selected good responders after neo-adjuvant treatment. In these patients replacement of the standard of care total mesorectal excision (TME) by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) or omission of surgery after chemoradiation (CRT) was proposed. Before organ sparing treatments could be applied in clinical practice a reliable patient selection procedure has to be available as only good treatment responders after neo-adjuvant therapy are candidates for such adapted therapy. Different imaging modalities have been studied for their ability to distinguish good treatment responders from others. Examples of such imaging modalities with some promising results regarding response assessment are fludeoxyglucosepositron emission tomography (FDG-PET), T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (T2w-MRI), dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion weighted MR imaging (DW-MRI). Besides these modalities dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound (D-CEUS) is a new modality used for tissue characterization and therapy response assessment in several tumor locations, like liver tumors and breast cancer. D-CEUS reflect tissue vascular perfusion. For rectal cancer, the value of D-CEUS for pathological response prediction and assessment has never been assessed. Therefore, in this study we assessed D-CEUS to predict and assess pathological response in rectal cancer after neo-adjuvant CRT.
Currently, there is no clear indication if exercise is safe and if it confers health benefits for adults across the cancer trajectory (i.e., from diagnosis onward) for rectal cancer - a population who may have limited exercise tolerance and who may be at an increased risk for adverse events associated with exercise. In this prospective single-arm feasibility trial, we aim to examine the safety and feasibility of a 12-week exercise intervention for adults diagnosed with rectal cancer to inform the development of a large-scale randomized controlled trial that will assess the efficacy of exercise administered across the cancer trajectory for for rectal cancer. Adults who have been diagnosed with rectal cancer and are currently undergoing or have completed treatment (within the last five years) will be recruited over a 12-month period into a supervised exercise intervention consisting of aerobic and strength training to be done three times per week. Feasibility, safety, patient-reported outcomes, and physical tests will be performed pre-intervention and post-intervention. This study will provide data on the feasibility of an exercise intervention and will help determine if it is safe to progress with a large-scale randomized controlled trial to test the benefits of exercise for adults diagnosed with rectal cancer. It will also provide initial estimates of the parameters for patient-reported outcomes, which are required to calculate the sample size for the large-scale randomized controlled trial to ensure it is sufficiently powered. The purpose of this prospective single-arm feasibility trial is to determine if a 12-week exercise intervention offered to adults diagnosed with rectal cancer surviviors is safe and feasible. The specific objectives are to: 1. Test the feasibility and safety of a 12-week exercise intervention; 2. Obtain initial estimates of the parameters of the main outcomes to inform sample size calculations for the main study (i.e., means and standard deviations for patient-reported and physical outcomes); 3. Determine the opportune time in the cancer trajectory for rectal cancer to deliver a 12-week exercise intervention.
Patients with locally advanced rectal or rectosigmoid cancer staged cT3 CRM-negative with MRI will receive 6 cycles of neoadjuvant treatment with mFOLFOX6 (Arm A) vs. mFOLFOX6 + aflibercept (Arm B) followed by surgery.
Early rectal cancer can be removed by minimally-invasive surgery, and the standard pathological assessment of the removed tumour gives valuable information about how advanced the tumour is. This gives an indication of how likely the cancer is to recur, so doctors and patient can decide on the most appropriate further treatment and follow-up. However there is still much uncertainty in these predictions about recurrence. This study will assess two further pathology tests, ploidy and stroma ratio in the tumour, by correlating the results with outcome. This will determine whether these two tests provide additional value in predicting outcome. If so, clinicians would be better able to advise patients with early rectal cancer about their prognosis and further management.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of concurrent capecitabine-based long-term radiotherapy followed by 4 cycles XELOX pre- a delayed TME compared with 6 cycles XELOX post- a Regular Timing TME in patients with high-risk rectal cancer defined by MRI.