Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01547611
Other study ID # Rehab. after cervical surgery
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received February 27, 2012
Last updated March 5, 2018
Start date January 2009
Est. completion date December 2014

Study information

Verified date March 2018
Source Linkoeping University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Many patients with cervical disc disease have long-lasting and complex symptoms with chronic pain, low levels of physical and psychological function and sick-leave. Surgery on a few segmental levels might be expected to solve the disc-specific pain but not the non-specific neck pain and the patients'illness. As much as 2/3 of the patients have been reported to have remaining physical/ psychological disability long-term after surgery. A structured physiotherapy programme after surgery may improve patients'function and return to work. The main purpose of the study is to evaluate what a well structured rehabilitation program adds to the customary treatment after surgery for radiculopathy due to cervical disc disease in respect to function, disability, workability and cost effectiveness. The study is a prospective randomised controlled multi-centre study, with an independent and blinded investigator comparing two alternatives of rehabilitation. 200 patients in working age, with cervical disc disease with clinical findings and symptoms of cervical nerve root compression will be included after informed consent. After inclusion in the study patients will be randomised to one out of the two alternatives of physiotherapy, (A) customary treatment (information/ advice on the specialist clinic) or (A+B) active physiotherapy; standardised and structured program of neck specific exercises combined with a behavioural approach plus customary treatment. Patients will be evaluated both clinically and with questionnaires before surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after surgery. Main outcome variable are neck specific disability. Cost-effectiveness will be calculated. The inclusion will preliminary be closed 2012. The study could contribute to a better clinical decision making, a better health care which will reduce physical, mental and social costs for the patients, and improve the rates of patients returning to and staying at work.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 202
Est. completion date December 2014
Est. primary completion date December 2014
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 70 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients will be included from four Neurosurgical clinics in the south of Sweden and the rehabilitation will be performed in primary care units in several counties.

- Patients in working age, with MRI-verified cervical disc disease with clinical findings and symptoms of cervical nerve root compression and who have had surgery with anterior decompression and fusion or posterior surgery (foraminotomy/ laminectomy) will be included after informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients with myelopathy or with a disease or trauma contraindicated to perform the treatment program or the measurements will be excluded and so also patients with lack of familiarity of the Swedish language or with known drug abuse.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Customary treatment
The staff at the Neurosurgical clinic will give the patient ordinary pre- and postoperative information. The physiotherapist at the Neurosurgical clinic informs the patients what to avoid the first weeks after surgery and the importance of a good posture and ergonomic thinking in daily life. The patient is also instructed how to do exercises for the shoulder range of motion. Patients have ordinary post-surgery visit to the surgeon and to the physiotherapist about 6 weeks after the surgery, where physiotherapist instructs the patient in exercises for active neck range of motion.
Structured behavioural medicine program
The behavioural medicine program includes functional behavioural analysis of the problem, medical exercise therapy, strategies to increase self-efficacy in activities and problem-solving strategies for coping with disability.

Locations

Country Name City State
Sweden Department of Medical and Health Sciences Linköping Östergötland
Sweden Linköping University Linköping Östergötland

Sponsors (5)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Linkoeping University Karolinska University Hospital, Lund University Hospital, Ryhov County Hospital, University Hospital, Linkoeping

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Sweden, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Neck Disability Index (NDI) NDI will be measured at baseline before surgical intervention. Change from baseline in NDI will be measured at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up.
NDI will be used to investigate Neck specific disability. The 10 sections in the questionnaire are rated on a six-point scale (0-5 point). The scores for all sections are added together and transformed to percentages (where 0% is no pain or difficulties and 100% is highest score for pain and difficulty on all items.
Baseline and change after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measures is going to report a change over time.
Secondary Pain intensity on visual analogue scale (VAS 0-100mm) Pain intensity of neck pain, arm pain and headache, respectively The outcome measure is going to report a change over time from baseline and at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up
Secondary Dizziness/ unsteadiness measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) 0-100mm Dizziness/ unsteadiness measured on a VAS-scale (0=no problems, 100= pretty severe problems). The outcome measure is going to report a change over time from baseline to 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up
Secondary Modified Odom scale and a question if how important the change is. A 1 to 6 point scale of treatment outcome. 1=recovered, 2=much better, 3=better, 4=unchanged, 5=worse, 6= much worse. How important is the change on a 0 to 10 point horizontal scale (0=not at all important, 10= very important). The outcome measure is going to report a change over time from before surgery to 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up.
Secondary Expectations of treatment fulfilled Fulfillment of the expectations for surgery at follow-ups was measured on a four-grade scale (1=yes, completely; 2=yes, partially; 3=no, not at all; or 4= do not know). The outcome measure is going to report a change from 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up.
Secondary Background data Pain history, pain debute, pain duration, pain medication, other diseases and problems than from the neck, age, sex, smoking, family and social life, expectations of the treatment, care seeking, type of work Mainly before treatment started. Some basic background data are also asked at the follow-ups at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months to control for variations over time.
Secondary Vocational situation Questionns about sick-leave, ergonomics, expectations of being able to work in 6 months, work ability index Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Secondary Pain-drawing Character of pain, number of pain localisation and distributions of symptoms Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Secondary Zung questionnaire Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Secondary MSPQ questionnaire Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Secondary Distress and risk assessment method (DRAM) Zung and MSPQ questionnaires will be combined in the DRAM instrument Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Secondary Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Secondary Coping Strategies Questionnaire Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Secondary Work Ability Index Before intervention and at 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Secondary Physical activity/ exercise habits Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Secondary Symptom satisfaction How patients would feel about having their current neck symptoms for the rest of their lives was rated on a seven grade scale (1= delighted, 7=terrible). Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Secondary Pain frequency and pain medication Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Secondary Self-efficacy scale "People´s beliefs about their capabilities to produce designated levels of performance that exercise influence overe events that affect their lives" Self efficacy (Altmaier) is a 20 item, 11 point scale (0=not at all confident, 10=completely confident). Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Secondary Question about re-surgery Descriptive data Before intervention and at 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Secondary EuroQuol five dimensions self report (EQ-5D) and EuroQuol thermometer Health realted quality of life Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Secondary Multidimensional Pain Inventory, Swedish version (MPI-S), MPI-S significant others and open questions Relationship and support from spouses Before intervention and at 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Secondary Neurological status Questions of numbness and tinglings in the arm and hand and pain distribution. Clinical examination: sensibility, reflexes, motor function. Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Secondary Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Secondary Physical clinical outcome measures Range of motion in the neck, head repositioning accuracy (cervical kinesteshia), hand strength, balance (sharpened Romberg, walking in a figure of eight), neck muscle endurance Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Secondary Patients income Will be used for health echonomic calculations At baseline and at 1 and 2 years follow up. The outcome is going to report a change over time
Secondary Copy of the sick-leave receipt from the surgeon Copy of the sickness certificate written by the physician. The certificate will be analysed due to quality with the emphasis on how the cervical radiculopathy impact on function and work ability and due to the quality of sickness certificate in relation to Swedish insurance office rules. After surgery (baseline, before physiotherapy started)
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03733886 - Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain. N/A
Completed NCT03835182 - Efficacy of Ultrasound Versus Short Wave Diathermy in the Treatment of a Slipped Disc of the Lower Back N/A
Completed NCT04169477 - Comparison of Two Modes of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in Chronic Neuropathic Radiculalgia N/A
Completed NCT02265848 - High Frequency Stimulation Trials in Patients With Precision Spinal Cord Stimulator System Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT05487690 - Application of 3D Printing Guide Plate in Spinal Minimally Invasive and Interventional Surgeries N/A
Recruiting NCT04909138 - Intermittent Dosing of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation as an Alternate Paradigm to Continuous Low-Frequency Therapy N/A
Completed NCT05533723 - Comparison Between Endoscopic Epidural Neuroplasty and Percutaneous Epidural Neuroplasty in Low Back and Radicular Pain
Not yet recruiting NCT06041347 - Learning Curve for the Visualization of Sacral Plexus on TVS
Completed NCT02939482 - A Study Comparison of Clinical Outcome After Different Rate of Infusion in Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection N/A
Recruiting NCT05732818 - Lumbar Operatively Inserted PerQdisc Artificial Implant Following Nuclectomy 3 N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04559295 - Bone Marrow Concentrate (BMC) Injection in Intervertebral Discs Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT02644421 - Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Analgesic Efficacy of VVZ-149 in Lumbar Radiculopathy (Sciatica) Phase 1
Recruiting NCT06193265 - Management of Lumbar Discectomy by Endoscopy and Conventional Microscopic Discectomy
Recruiting NCT05145842 - The Effect of Combination of Ultrasound and Flouroscopy Guidance in Caudal Epidural Injections N/A
Withdrawn NCT03327272 - Impact of Local Steroid Application in Extreme Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Phase 3
Withdrawn NCT02196883 - Steroid Injections Given at the "Level of MRI Pathology" Versus at the "Level of Clinical Symptoms" to See if One is More Effective Than the Other. N/A
Terminated NCT01850771 - Regenexx™ PL-Disc Versus Steroid Epidurals for Lumbar Radiculopathy N/A
Completed NCT02130258 - Somatosensory Profiling in Radicular Pain Patients And it's Correlation With Treatment Outcome N/A
Withdrawn NCT05347108 - Real-Time Accurate Pathology Inspection and Decompression Study
Active, not recruiting NCT05696470 - Fusion Rates of 3D Printed Porous Titanium Cages in Three and Four Level ACDFs