Radiculopathy Clinical Trial
Official title:
Outcome of Physiotherapy After Surgery for Cervical Disc Disease: a Prospective Randomised Multi-Centre Trial
Verified date | March 2018 |
Source | Linkoeping University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Many patients with cervical disc disease have long-lasting and complex symptoms with chronic pain, low levels of physical and psychological function and sick-leave. Surgery on a few segmental levels might be expected to solve the disc-specific pain but not the non-specific neck pain and the patients'illness. As much as 2/3 of the patients have been reported to have remaining physical/ psychological disability long-term after surgery. A structured physiotherapy programme after surgery may improve patients'function and return to work. The main purpose of the study is to evaluate what a well structured rehabilitation program adds to the customary treatment after surgery for radiculopathy due to cervical disc disease in respect to function, disability, workability and cost effectiveness. The study is a prospective randomised controlled multi-centre study, with an independent and blinded investigator comparing two alternatives of rehabilitation. 200 patients in working age, with cervical disc disease with clinical findings and symptoms of cervical nerve root compression will be included after informed consent. After inclusion in the study patients will be randomised to one out of the two alternatives of physiotherapy, (A) customary treatment (information/ advice on the specialist clinic) or (A+B) active physiotherapy; standardised and structured program of neck specific exercises combined with a behavioural approach plus customary treatment. Patients will be evaluated both clinically and with questionnaires before surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after surgery. Main outcome variable are neck specific disability. Cost-effectiveness will be calculated. The inclusion will preliminary be closed 2012. The study could contribute to a better clinical decision making, a better health care which will reduce physical, mental and social costs for the patients, and improve the rates of patients returning to and staying at work.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 202 |
Est. completion date | December 2014 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2014 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 70 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Patients will be included from four Neurosurgical clinics in the south of Sweden and the rehabilitation will be performed in primary care units in several counties. - Patients in working age, with MRI-verified cervical disc disease with clinical findings and symptoms of cervical nerve root compression and who have had surgery with anterior decompression and fusion or posterior surgery (foraminotomy/ laminectomy) will be included after informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with myelopathy or with a disease or trauma contraindicated to perform the treatment program or the measurements will be excluded and so also patients with lack of familiarity of the Swedish language or with known drug abuse. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Sweden | Department of Medical and Health Sciences | Linköping | Östergötland |
Sweden | Linköping University | Linköping | Östergötland |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Linkoeping University | Karolinska University Hospital, Lund University Hospital, Ryhov County Hospital, University Hospital, Linkoeping |
Sweden,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Neck Disability Index (NDI) | NDI will be measured at baseline before surgical intervention. Change from baseline in NDI will be measured at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. NDI will be used to investigate Neck specific disability. The 10 sections in the questionnaire are rated on a six-point scale (0-5 point). The scores for all sections are added together and transformed to percentages (where 0% is no pain or difficulties and 100% is highest score for pain and difficulty on all items. |
Baseline and change after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measures is going to report a change over time. | |
Secondary | Pain intensity on visual analogue scale (VAS 0-100mm) | Pain intensity of neck pain, arm pain and headache, respectively | The outcome measure is going to report a change over time from baseline and at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up | |
Secondary | Dizziness/ unsteadiness measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) 0-100mm | Dizziness/ unsteadiness measured on a VAS-scale (0=no problems, 100= pretty severe problems). | The outcome measure is going to report a change over time from baseline to 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up | |
Secondary | Modified Odom scale and a question if how important the change is. | A 1 to 6 point scale of treatment outcome. 1=recovered, 2=much better, 3=better, 4=unchanged, 5=worse, 6= much worse. How important is the change on a 0 to 10 point horizontal scale (0=not at all important, 10= very important). | The outcome measure is going to report a change over time from before surgery to 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. | |
Secondary | Expectations of treatment fulfilled | Fulfillment of the expectations for surgery at follow-ups was measured on a four-grade scale (1=yes, completely; 2=yes, partially; 3=no, not at all; or 4= do not know). | The outcome measure is going to report a change from 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. | |
Secondary | Background data | Pain history, pain debute, pain duration, pain medication, other diseases and problems than from the neck, age, sex, smoking, family and social life, expectations of the treatment, care seeking, type of work | Mainly before treatment started. Some basic background data are also asked at the follow-ups at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months to control for variations over time. | |
Secondary | Vocational situation | Questionns about sick-leave, ergonomics, expectations of being able to work in 6 months, work ability index | Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time. | |
Secondary | Pain-drawing | Character of pain, number of pain localisation and distributions of symptoms | Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time. | |
Secondary | Zung questionnaire | Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time. | ||
Secondary | MSPQ questionnaire | Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time. | ||
Secondary | Distress and risk assessment method (DRAM) | Zung and MSPQ questionnaires will be combined in the DRAM instrument | Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time. | |
Secondary | Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) | Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time. | ||
Secondary | Coping Strategies Questionnaire | Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time. | ||
Secondary | Work Ability Index | Before intervention and at 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time. | ||
Secondary | Physical activity/ exercise habits | Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time. | ||
Secondary | Symptom satisfaction | How patients would feel about having their current neck symptoms for the rest of their lives was rated on a seven grade scale (1= delighted, 7=terrible). | Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time. | |
Secondary | Pain frequency and pain medication | Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time. | ||
Secondary | Self-efficacy scale | "People´s beliefs about their capabilities to produce designated levels of performance that exercise influence overe events that affect their lives" Self efficacy (Altmaier) is a 20 item, 11 point scale (0=not at all confident, 10=completely confident). | Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time. | |
Secondary | Question about re-surgery | Descriptive data | Before intervention and at 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time. | |
Secondary | EuroQuol five dimensions self report (EQ-5D) and EuroQuol thermometer | Health realted quality of life | Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time. | |
Secondary | Multidimensional Pain Inventory, Swedish version (MPI-S), MPI-S significant others and open questions | Relationship and support from spouses | Before intervention and at 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time. | |
Secondary | Neurological status | Questions of numbness and tinglings in the arm and hand and pain distribution. Clinical examination: sensibility, reflexes, motor function. | Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time. | |
Secondary | Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) | Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time. | ||
Secondary | Physical clinical outcome measures | Range of motion in the neck, head repositioning accuracy (cervical kinesteshia), hand strength, balance (sharpened Romberg, walking in a figure of eight), neck muscle endurance | Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time. | |
Secondary | Patients income | Will be used for health echonomic calculations | At baseline and at 1 and 2 years follow up. The outcome is going to report a change over time | |
Secondary | Copy of the sick-leave receipt from the surgeon | Copy of the sickness certificate written by the physician. The certificate will be analysed due to quality with the emphasis on how the cervical radiculopathy impact on function and work ability and due to the quality of sickness certificate in relation to Swedish insurance office rules. | After surgery (baseline, before physiotherapy started) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03733886 -
Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03835182 -
Efficacy of Ultrasound Versus Short Wave Diathermy in the Treatment of a Slipped Disc of the Lower Back
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04169477 -
Comparison of Two Modes of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in Chronic Neuropathic Radiculalgia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02265848 -
High Frequency Stimulation Trials in Patients With Precision Spinal Cord Stimulator System
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05487690 -
Application of 3D Printing Guide Plate in Spinal Minimally Invasive and Interventional Surgeries
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04909138 -
Intermittent Dosing of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation as an Alternate Paradigm to Continuous Low-Frequency Therapy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05533723 -
Comparison Between Endoscopic Epidural Neuroplasty and Percutaneous Epidural Neuroplasty in Low Back and Radicular Pain
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06041347 -
Learning Curve for the Visualization of Sacral Plexus on TVS
|
||
Completed |
NCT02939482 -
A Study Comparison of Clinical Outcome After Different Rate of Infusion in Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05732818 -
Lumbar Operatively Inserted PerQdisc Artificial Implant Following Nuclectomy 3
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04559295 -
Bone Marrow Concentrate (BMC) Injection in Intervertebral Discs
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02644421 -
Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Analgesic Efficacy of VVZ-149 in Lumbar Radiculopathy (Sciatica)
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06193265 -
Management of Lumbar Discectomy by Endoscopy and Conventional Microscopic Discectomy
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05145842 -
The Effect of Combination of Ultrasound and Flouroscopy Guidance in Caudal Epidural Injections
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03327272 -
Impact of Local Steroid Application in Extreme Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
|
Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02196883 -
Steroid Injections Given at the "Level of MRI Pathology" Versus at the "Level of Clinical Symptoms" to See if One is More Effective Than the Other.
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01850771 -
Regenexx™ PL-Disc Versus Steroid Epidurals for Lumbar Radiculopathy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02130258 -
Somatosensory Profiling in Radicular Pain Patients And it's Correlation With Treatment Outcome
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05347108 -
Real-Time Accurate Pathology Inspection and Decompression Study
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05696470 -
Fusion Rates of 3D Printed Porous Titanium Cages in Three and Four Level ACDFs
|