Radial Head Fractures Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Multi-Center, Post-Market, Single-Arm, Observational Clinical Follow-Up Study of Patients Undergoing Radial Head Replacement Using the DePuy Synthes Radial Head Replacement System for Partial Replacement of the Elbow Joint
| Verified date | February 2023 |
| Source | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Observational |
The purpose of this study is to establish survivorship defined by the cumulative incidence of revision over the first 6 months post-implantation.
| Status | Withdrawn |
| Enrollment | 0 |
| Est. completion date | March 31, 2030 |
| Est. primary completion date | March 31, 2026 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 22 Years and older |
| Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Male or female - skeletally mature adult (aged 22 or older) - Participant, who in the opinion of the Investigator, is able to understand the purpose of the study and is willing to return for all the required post-operative standard of care follow-up visits and have their data collected - Participant who is willing to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this clinical investigation and authorize the transfer of his/her information to the Sponsor Any one of below: - Primary replacement after fracture of the radial head - Participant needing a partial radial head replacement for degenerative or post-traumatic conditions presenting pain, crepitation, and decreased motion at the radio-humeral and/or proximal radio-ulnar joint with: i) joint destruction and/or subluxation visible on x-ray and/or ii. resistance to conservative treatment - Symptomatic sequelae after radial head resection - Revision following failed radial head arthroplasty Exclusion Criteria: - Dislocations of radius on ulna that would not allow a radio-humeral articulation - Rheumatoid arthritis - Infection, sepsis, and osteomyelitis - Uncooperative participant or participant with neurologic disorders who is incapable of following directions, osteoporosis, metabolic disorders which may impair bone formation, osteomalacia, distant foci of infections which may spread to the implant site, rapid joint destruction, marked bone loss or bone resorption apparent on roentgenogram - Participants with limited life expectancy due to significant medical co-morbidity - Presence of major vascular or major nerve injury (radial, ulnar, medial, musculocutaneous) - Women who are pregnant or lactating - Unable to comply with study requirements example, with maintaining follow-up - Individuals currently involved in any personal injury litigation, medical-legal or worker's compensation claims - Individuals that have participated in a clinical investigation with an investigational product (drug or device) in the last three months - Demented or unable to provide informed consent - Individuals, in the opinion of the Investigator, who are drug or alcohol abusers or have psychological disorders that could affect their ability to complete participant reported questionnaires or be compliant with follow-up requirements |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | Glasgow Royal Infirmary (NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde) | Glasgow | |
| United States | MetroHealth Medical Center | Cleveland | Ohio |
| United States | Slocum Research & Education Foundation | Eugene | Oregon |
| United States | Inova Orthopaedics - Fairfax | Falls Church | Virginia |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. |
United States, United Kingdom,
Agyeman KD, Damodar D, Watkins I, Dodds SD. Does radial head implant fixation affect functional outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Jan;28(1):126-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.032. Epub 2018 Oct 17. — View Citation
Bahreini M, Safaie A, Mirfazaelian H, Jalili M. How much change in pain score does really matter to patients? Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Aug;38(8):1641-1646. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158489. Epub 2019 Nov 4. — View Citation
Bain, G., Eygendaal, D., and van Riet, R. (2020). Surgical Techniques for Trauma and Sports Related Injuries of the Elbow
Broberg MA, Morrey BF. Results of delayed excision of the radial head after fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986 Jun;68(5):669-74. — View Citation
Churchill RW, Munoz J, Ahmad CS. Osteochondritis dissecans of the elbow. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016 Jun;9(2):232-9. doi: 10.1007/s12178-016-9342-y. — View Citation
Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006 Aug;37(8):691-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130. Epub 2006 Jun 30. — View Citation
Cusick MC, Bonnaig NS, Azar FM, Mauck BM, Smith RA, Throckmorton TW. Accuracy and reliability of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Jun;39(6):1146-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.01.041. Epub 2014 Mar 20. — View Citation
Devlin NJ, Shah KK, Feng Y, Mulhern B, van Hout B. Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England. Health Econ. 2018 Jan;27(1):7-22. doi: 10.1002/hec.3564. Epub 2017 Aug 22. — View Citation
Duckworth AD, McQueen MM, Ring D. Fractures of the radial head. Bone Joint J. 2013 Feb;95-B(2):151-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.29877. — View Citation
Fowler JR, Goitz RJ. Radial head fractures: indications and outcomes for radial head arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2013 Jul;44(3):425-31, x. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2013.03.013. Epub 2013 Apr 17. — View Citation
Gao Y, Zhang W, Duan X, Yang J, Al-Qwbani M, Lv J, Xiang Z. Surgical interventions for treating radial head fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;(5):CD008987. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008987.pub2. — View Citation
Gerbershagen HJ, Rothaug J, Kalkman CJ, Meissner W. Determination of moderate-to-severe postoperative pain on the numeric rating scale: a cut-off point analysis applying four different methods. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Oct;107(4):619-26. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer195. Epub 2011 Jun 30. — View Citation
Giannicola G, Sacchetti FM, Antonietti G, Piccioli A, Postacchini R, Cinotti G. Radial head, radiocapitellar and total elbow arthroplasties: a review of recent literature. Injury. 2014 Feb;45(2):428-36. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.09.019. Epub 2013 Sep 19. — View Citation
GmbH, S. (2020). Instructions for Use - Radial Head Replacement System (https://ifu.depuysynthes.com/?lang=en&archive=&keyword=Radial+Head).
Grewal R, MacDermid JC, Faber KJ, Drosdowech DS, King GJ. Comminuted radial head fractures treated with a modular metallic radial head arthroplasty. Study of outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Oct;88(10):2192-200. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00962. — View Citation
Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003 Jun 16;4:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-4-11. Epub 2003 Jun 16. — View Citation
Heijink A, Kodde IF, Mulder PGH, Veltman ES, Kaas L, van den Bekerom MPJ, Eygendaal D. Radial Head Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. JBJS Rev. 2016 Oct 18;4(10):e3. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.15.00095. — View Citation
Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9. — View Citation
Jung M, Groetzner-Schmidt C, Porschke F, Grutzner PA, Guehring T, Schnetzke M. Low return-to-sports rate after elbow injury and treatment with radial head arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Aug;28(8):1441-1448. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.03.014. Epub 2019 Jun 18. — View Citation
Kaas L, van Riet RP, Vroemen JP, Eygendaal D. The epidemiology of radial head fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jun;19(4):520-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.015. Epub 2010 Feb 10. — View Citation
Lamas C, Castellanos J, Proubasta I, Dominguez E. Comminuted radial head fractures treated with pyrocarbon prosthetic replacement. Hand (N Y). 2011 Mar;6(1):27-33. doi: 10.1007/s11552-010-9282-8. Epub 2010 Jun 15. — View Citation
Lapner M, King GJ. Radial head fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jun 19;95(12):1136-43. No abstract available. — View Citation
MacDermid, J., Solomon, G., Valdes, K., and American Society of Hand, T. (2015). Clinical assessment recommendations
Mansat P. Surgical treatment of the rheumatoid elbow. Joint Bone Spine. 2001 May;68(3):198-210. doi: 10.1016/s1297-319x(01)00273-1. — View Citation
Merolla G, Buononato C, Chillemi C, Paladini P, Porcellini G. Arthroscopic joint debridement and capsular release in primary and post-traumatic elbow osteoarthritis: a retrospective blinded cohort study with minimum 24-month follow-up. Musculoskelet Surg. 2015 Sep;99 Suppl 1:S83-90. doi: 10.1007/s12306-015-0365-0. Epub 2015 May 10. — View Citation
Murphy, A. Elbow (Coyle's view) (Radiopaedia)
Skytta ET, Eskelinen A, Paavolainen P, Ikavalko M, Remes V. Total elbow arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2009 Aug;80(4):472-7. doi: 10.3109/17453670903110642. — View Citation
Synthes, D. (2020a). Instructions for Use - Radial Head Replacement System
Synthes, D. (2020b). Radial Head Replacement System Surgical Technique
Synthes, D. (2020c). Radial Head Replacement System Surgical Technique Guide, pp. Surgical Technique Guide
Tarallo L, Mugnai R, Rocchi M, Capra F, Catani F. Mason type III radial head fractures treated by anatomic radial head arthroplasty: Is this a safe treatment option? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Apr;103(2):183-189. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.10.017. Epub 2016 Dec 8. — View Citation
* Note: There are 31 references in all — Click here to view all references
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Device survivorship Over the First 6 Months Post-implantation | Device survivorship is defined by the cumulative incidence of absence of revision. A revision is considered to be any procedure that involves removal of the implant (that is, removal of the Radial Head Prosthesis [RHP], replacement with another RHP or revision surgery to a total elbow arthroplasty). | 6 months post-implantation | |
| Secondary | Number of Participant with Revision Radial Head Replacement (RHR) Surgery | Number of participants with revision RHR surgery will be reported. Revision surgery reasons include symptomatic aseptic loosening, elbow stiffness, persistent pain, infection, elbow instability, overlengthening, dissociation of the prosthesis, progressive symptomatic ulnohumeral degeneration, secondary fracture, heterotopic ossification, osteoarthritis, erosions of the capitellum, or other implant-related complications. | Up to 4 years post surgery | |
| Secondary | Assessment of Radiographic Parameters: Mason Classification of Radial Head Fractures | Mason classification system will be used for the classification of radial head fractures. It includes four radial head fracture types. Mason Type I are non-displaced radial head fractures (or small marginal fractures), Mason Type II are partial articular fractures with displacement, Mason Type III are comminuted fractures involving the entire radial head, and Mason Type IV are fractures of the radial head with dislocation of the elbow joint. | Preoperative, Operative, Discharge (up to Day 6) | |
| Secondary | Assessment of Radiographic Parameters: Radiolucency | Radiolucency will be assessed based on the number of zones involved and the amount of lucency (in millimeters) observed. Radiolucency is classified as: a) None; b) Mild: one or two zones involved by lucent lines of less than (<) 2 millimeters (mm) in thickness; c) Moderate: three to six zones involved or the lucency of greater than or equal to (>=) 2 mm in thickness and d) Severe: all seven zones involved. | At Months 6, 12, and 24 | |
| Secondary | Assessment of Radiographic Parameters: Radiocapitellar Alignment | Radiocapitellar alignment will be determined. The position of the radial head prosthesis is assessed on a lateral X-ray based on the intersection between the axis of the prosthetic shaft and the center of the capitellum. The calculation is based on the quotient of the diameter of the trochlea humeri and the axis of the prosthesis. | Operative at Week 2, and 6, Months 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 post operative | |
| Secondary | Assessment of Radiographic Parameters: Ulnohumeral Degeneration | Ulnohumeral degeneration will be assessed. The degree of ulnohumeral degeneration is classified with the system described by Broberg and Morrey as Grade 0 (normal joint), Grade 1 (slight joint space narrowing with minimum osteophyte formation), Grade 2 (moderate joint space narrowing with moderate osteophyte formation) or Grade 3 (severe degenerative changes with gross destruction of the joint). | Operative at Week 2, and 6, Months 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 post operative | |
| Secondary | Assessment of Radiographic Parameters: Osteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis (in the radio-capitellar joint) will be assessed. Osteoarthritis is evaluated as yes/no, if yes, the location will be described (that is., medial, lateral or both). | At Week 2, and 6, Months 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 | |
| Secondary | Assessment of Radiographic Parameters: Heterotopic Ossification | Heterotopic ossification will be determined and reported. Heterotopic ossification is classified as present (that is, anterior-posterior, medial-lateral) or absent. | At Week 2, and 6, Months 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 | |
| Secondary | Assessment of Radiographic Parameters: Osteopenia, and/or Capitellar Abrasion | Osteopenia, and/or capitellar abrasion will be determined and reported. Capitellar osteopenia and/or abrasion is classified as none, mild, moderate, or severe. | At Week 2, and 6, Months 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 | |
| Secondary | Assessment of Radiographic Parameters: Overlengthening | Overlengthening will be determined and reported. Overlengthening is assessed on the intra- or postoperative, 6-, 12- and 24 months Antero-Posterior (AP) and lateral X-rays (evidence of overstuffing). | Operative at Months 6, 12, and 24 post operative | |
| Secondary | Assessment of Radiographic Parameters: Joint incongruity | Joint incongruity will be determined and reported. Joint incongruity is assessed as yes/no. | Operative at Week 2, and 6, Months 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 post operative | |
| Secondary | Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) Score | MEPI is also known as Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). MEPI is used to evaluate the clinical outcomes for a variety of elbow disorders such as elbow fractures and dislocations. The MEPI is a validated hundred-point system based upon pain (forty five points), range of motion (twenty points), stability (ten points) and daily function (twenty five points) The scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating a better outcome. | Week 2 and 6, Months 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 | |
| Secondary | Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) Score | QuickDASH questionnaire has 30-items, which includes 21 items for physical function, 6 for symptoms, and 3 for social roles. Quick DASH is a shorter version, developed for less burden to the responder. It consists of 11 items out of the original 30 questions of the DASH. QuickDASH is scored between 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability), with lower scores indicating better overall wellness. | Week 2 and 6, Months 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 | |
| Secondary | Elbow Range of Motion (ROM) | Elbow ROM of both sites (injured side and contralateral side) will be assessed according to standard of care practices for elbow flexion, elbow extension, forearm supination, and forearm pronation. | Week 2 and 6, Months 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 | |
| Secondary | Grip Strength of the Injured Limb Compared to the Contralateral Side | The grip strength (if available) will be assessed with dynamometer following the standardized testing protocol recommended by the American Society of Hand Therapists (ASHT). For measurements, the participants would be in a comfortable sitting position in a chair without arm rests, with feet fully resting on the floor, hips as far back in the chair as possible, and the hips and knees positioned at approximately 90 degrees. Grip force should be applied smoothly, without rapid wrenching or jerking motion. (No correction for hand dominance will be performed because this effect varies substantially among users. Assessment will be also performed on the unaffected side using the same method. | At Week 6, Months 6, 12, 24 and 48 | |
| Secondary | European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scale Score | EQ-5D-5L questionnaire includes five questions (descriptive system: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) and a visual analog scale to rate the current health status. The resulting scores were converted into a single index score that ranged from -0.281 to 1, where higher score indicates better health. Values lower than 0 represent states considered to be worse than death. | Preoperative, Week 6, Months 6, 12, 24, and 48 | |
| Secondary | Local Pain Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score | Local pain intensity levels over the previous 24 hours will be assessed with the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The scale range goes from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). A higher value correlates with greater pain. | Week 2 and 6, Months 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants who Return to Work and Sport | Number of participants who return to work and Sport will be assessed as yes/no. | Week 2 and 6, Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants with Device and/or Procedure-related Adverse Events (AEs) | Any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or untoward clinical signs (including abnormal laboratory findings) in participants, users or other persons, whether or not related to investigational medical device, the Radial Head Replacement System, and whether anticipated or unanticipated. | Operative, Discharge (up to Day 6), Week 2, 6, Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants with Device and/or Procedure-related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs are defined as any device and or procedure related adverse event that: 1. Led to death; 2. Serious deterioration in the health of the subject, that resulted in any of the following: a. life-threatening illness or injury, b. permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, c. hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, d. medical or surgical intervention to prevent life-threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function, e. chronic disease; 3. Led to fetal distress, fetal death or a congenital physical or mental impairment or birth defect. | Operative, Discharge (up to Day 6), Week 2, 6, Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants with Revision/Reoperations | Number of participants with revision/reoperation will be reported. A revision is considered to be any procedure that involves removal of the implant (that is, removal of the RHP, replacement with another RHP or revision surgery to a total elbow arthroplasty). Reoperation is defined as a second operation involving the DePuy Synthes Radial Head Replacement System at the index site and after the index surgery that does not include removal or replacement of the implanted Radial Head Prosthesis. | Operative, Discharge (up to Day 6), Week 2, 6, Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed |
NCT01269840 -
Comparison of Two Radial Head Implants
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03944590 -
Radiological and Clinical Outcome After Screw Osteosynthesis of Radial Head Fractures
|