Pulpitis - Irreversible Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Preparation With Wave One and Neolix in Acute Irreversible Pulpitis of Mandibular Premolar Teeth
the aim in this prospective in vivo randomized clinical trial to evaluate the influence of
instrumentation technique ( reciprocation single file (wave one ) versus rotation single
file (neolix) ) on post operative pain ( incidence ,degree and duration ) after endodontic
treatment in single rooted lower premolars with symptomatic irreversible pulpits.
According to the inclusion criteria the patients enrolled in the study and allocated
randomly into two groups either Wave One (group A) or Neolix ( group B) the endodontic
treatment is done at single visit. firstly the patient's medical and dental history is taken
.the patient assign on informed consent. and then,anaesthetized and access cavity performed
and root canal preparation is done by either two systems and then irrigation and obturation
is done. the patient record the post operative pain in sheet with NRS after 6,12,24,48hr and
the operator will recall the patient to check the records and follow up the patient.
Medical and dental history: diagnostic charts will be collected in a case report form by the
investigators and confirmed for eligibility with the assistant supervisor.
Radiographic examination : preoperative radiographs will be taken to examine the tooth
structure,caries detection , periapical status .
Clinical examination : intraoral examination include visual examination for caries ,
restoration ,swelling ,fistula . mobility, percussion were done .
Diagnostic criteria for symptomatic irreversible pulpitis:
1. The patient marks moderate to severe pain on the numerical rating scale (NRS) . a
horizontal line of 11 marks and 10 intervals each takes numbers from 0 to 10 where 0 =
no pain , 1-3 =mild pain , 4-6 = moderate pain , 7-10 = severe pain (recording the
baseline degree of pain preoperatively before initiating the endodontic treatment ) all
the steps done by the same operator.
2. The patient shows severe pain which lasts long after thermal testing which is done by
applying hot compound stick on the tooth after coating it with a lubricant.
3. The patient responds to electric pulp tester at a lower level than the contralateral
tooth or the adjacent tooth if the contralateral one is missing.
Intervention:
Forty four patients will included and they will be randomly divided into two groups A =root
canal preparation with single reciprocating file (Wave One ® Dentsply , Switzerland) and B =
Root canal preparation with single full rotation file (Neolix ® Neolix ,France) each group
consisted from 22 patient .
Procedure steps :
1. Patients are asked to rate their pain level on numerical rating scale before the
anesthesia injection and the start of the preparation to get the baseline record for
the pain preoperatively .
2. The patient will receive inferior alveolar nerve block injections ( 1.8 ml mepivacaine
hydrochloride 2% ( 1: 100,000 epinephrine ) using a side loading aspirating syringe and
27-gauge long needle.
3. At 15-minutes post injection, access cavity is performed using round bur size 4 and
endo-z bur.
4. Tooth is then isolated using rubber dam to prevent introduction of saliva and Bactria
from the oral cavity .
5. Checking the patency of the canal with K- file (Mani Inc., Japan). size 10 taper 0.02,
extirpation of pulp with H-file (Mani Inc., Japan). size 15 taper 0.02 .
6. An electronic apex locator ( Morita Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) will be used to
determine working length, and then working length will be confirmed radiographically to
be adjusted 1mm shorter that the root apex.
7. Each patient has equal chance to enter either the intervention groups A or B group as
each patient takes number in excel sheet divided into two groups A and B chosen by
assistant supervisor who determine which system will be used with this patient .
8. Comparator group: If the system to by used is Wave One the canal preparation is done by
primary file size 25 taper 8% in narrow or curved canals if size 10 K file (Mani Inc.,
Japan) is passively fit in the canal ( most of canals ) , but in case of K-file (Mani
Inc., Japan) size 20 loose in the canal so we choose large large file size 40 taper 8%
either of them to the full working length with pre programmed motor (X-Smart Plus
(Dentsply) with reducing hand piece 6:1 more anticlockwise angle than clock wise one .
9. Experimental group : If the Neolix systems will be used ,then the first file used is C1
file size 25 taper 12% as orifice opener and for coronal flaring for 2/3 of canal
length the A1 file size 25 taper 8% in narrow or curved canals if size 10 K file (Mani
Inc., Japan). is passively fit in the canal (most of the canals) , but in case of
K-file (Mani Inc., Japan) size 20 loose in the canal so we choose large file size 40
taper 4% either of them to the full working length to the full working length with
X-Smart Plus motor with speed 300-500 rpm and torque 1.5 N.cm.
10. Irrigation is made between each file using 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and MD-ChelCream19%
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid cream (METABIOMED company , Korea).
11. The canals are then dried with paper points and obturated with gutta percha and ADSEAL
resin sealer(METABIOMED company, Korea) by selection of a master cone corresponding to
the size of master apical file, then spreader will be selected to provide auxiliary
cones using cold lateral compaction technique.
12. Access cavity is then sealed with temporary filling.
13. then rating of post operative pain after the treatment is recorded by numerical rating
scale ( NRS) in sheet given to the patient to record the degree of pain after 6 hrs ,12
hrs ,24 hrs ,48 hrs together with recalling the patient to check the record then the
patient return the sheet to the operator and then the collected sheets presented to
assistant supervisor.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT06268912 -
Cryoanalgesia for Irreversible Pulpitis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06330519 -
Impact of Different Techniques on The Efficacy of Anaesthesia in Mandibular Molars With Acute Irreversible Pulpitis
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05336682 -
Evaluation of Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair Techniques Versus Pulpectomy in Primary Molars With Inflammed Pulp
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06438523 -
A-prf,Nanochitosan Combined With A-prf Compared to Chitosan for Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis of Mature Teeth
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03956199 -
Pulpotomy vs.Root Canal Treatment in Managing Irreversible Pulpitis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03174860 -
Effect of Preoperative Diclofenac Potassium on Articaine Buccal Infitration Success
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05853185 -
Assessing Success of MTA and Pre-mixed Bioceramic in Mature Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis With Full Pulpotomy.
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03612323 -
Comparison Between Intraligamentary Piroxicam and Articaine
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02953912 -
Assessment of Postoperative Pain Using Reciproc Versus One Shape Files in Patients With Irreversible Pulpitis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04308863 -
Evaluation of Chitosan Scaffold and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Pulpotomy in Mature Permanent Molars With Irreversible Pulpitis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04719247 -
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Turmeric, Thymus Vulgaris, Nigella Sativa and Aloe Vera as Pulpotomy Medicaments in Primary Teeth
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05582317 -
Efficacy of Combination of Biodentine and Simvastatin as a Pulp Capping Materials in Vital Pulpotomy of Primary Molars
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05406557 -
Partial Versus Miniature Pulpotomy in Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05402098 -
Outcome Following Endodontic Treatment Using Traditional Access Versus Conservative Access
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05902936 -
Evaluation of Nano Bioactive Glass Combined With i-PRF Scaffold in Vital Pulp Treatments
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03553407 -
Analgesic Effect of Low Intensity Laser in Patients With Pulpitis of Mandibular Molars.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05904184 -
Comparison of Calcium Silicate-based Sealer and Epoxy Resin-based Sealer
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03916900 -
Postoperative Pain and Success Rate in Pulpotomy Versus Root Canal Treatment
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06088446 -
Effect of Intrapulpal Injections on the Post-endodontic Pain
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05964933 -
Pulpotomy vs Root Canal Treatment for Teeth With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis
|
N/A |