Pseudophakia Clinical Trial
Official title:
Maximizing Visual Outcomes With Eyhance IOLs
NCT number | NCT05611073 |
Other study ID # | JMM-1261 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | March 7, 2022 |
Est. completion date | November 7, 2022 |
Verified date | September 2023 |
Source | Berkeley Eye Center |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Observational [Patient Registry] |
This is a non-interventional prospective, single center, bilateral, non-randomized, open-label, observational clinical study. All patients will have had bilateral implantation of an Eyhance IOL at the time of cataract surgery. These patients will then be compared to assess which patient biometric properties (such as spherical aberration, q value, pupil size, etc.) lead to an overall increase in near or intermediate vision as well as overall patient satisfaction.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 131 |
Est. completion date | November 7, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | November 7, 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 40 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Adults, 40 years of age having already undergone uncomplicated cataract removal by phacoemulsification with a clear corneal incision in both eyes. 2. Implantation of bilateral Eyhance IOLs (DIB00/DIU***). 3. Able to comprehend and willing to sign informed consent and complete all required testing procedures. 4. Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) projected to be 0.10 logMAR (Minimum Angle of Resolution) or better. 5. Clear intraocular media. 6. Minimum of two weeks post YAG capsulotomy to treat PCO Exclusion Criteria: 1. Any corneal abnormality, other than regular corneal astigmatism (as determined by pre-operative testing) that in the opinion of the investigator would confound the outcome(s) of the study. 2. Any complication during cataract surgery (capsular tear, vitrectomy, etc.). 3. History of or current retinal conditions or predisposition to retinal conditions. 4. Amblyopia or strabismus in either eye. 5. History of or current anterior or posterior segment inflammation of any etiology. 6. Any form of neovascularization on or within the eye. 7. Glaucoma (uncontrolled or controlled with medication). 8. Optic nerve atrophy. 9. Subjects with diagnosed degenerative eye disorders. 10. Postoperative CDVA worse than 0.10 logMAR (20/25 snellen). 11. Subjects who have an acute or chronic disease or illness that would confound the results of this investigation in the opinion of the investigator (e.g. immunocompromised, connective tissue disease, clinically significant atopic disease, etc.). |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Berkeley Eye Center | Houston | Texas |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Berkeley Eye Center |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Comparison of a patient satisfaction survey between the two groups to assess for subjective differences in everyday life. Patient's answers will be on a scale between always and never, where never shows a better patient outcome. | Comparison of a patient satisfaction survey between the two groups to assess for subjective differences in everyday life to determine if the enhanced vision plays a statistically significant difference in patient's perceived quality of vision or quality of life. Patient's answers will be on a scale between always and never, where never shows a better patient outcome. | minimum of 3 weeks post operatively | |
Primary | Comparison of two groups categorized by "distance with minimal intermediate" and "distance with enhanced intermediate/near" based on mean photopic binocular BCDVA and DCIVA (at 66 cm) of patients with bilateral Eyhance IOLs corrected to plano sphere. | To compare two groups categorized by "distance with minimal intermediate" and "distance with enhanced intermediate/near" based on mean photopic binocular BCDVA and DCIVA (66 cm) of patients with bilateral Eyhance IOLs targeted corrected at plano sphere. | minimum of 3 weeks post operatively | |
Secondary | Determine if any statistically significant differences in pupil size exists between the two groups. | To determine if any statistically significant differences in pupil size exists between the two groups that may allow for pre-operative recognition of those patients who could have enhanced benefits of the Eyhance IOL. This will require multiple regression analysis given the large number of variables. | minimum of 3 weeks post operatively | |
Secondary | Determine if any statistically significant differences in spherical aberration exists between the two groups. | To determine if any statistically significant differences in spherical aberration exists between the two groups that may allow for pre-operative recognition of those patients who could have enhanced benefits of the Eyhance IOL. This will require multiple regression analysis given the large number of variables. | minimum of 3 weeks post operatively | |
Secondary | Determine if any statistically significant differences in q value exists between the two groups. | To determine if any statistically significant differences in q value exists between the two groups that may allow for pre-operative recognition of those patients who could have enhanced benefits of the Eyhance IOL. This will require multiple regression analysis given the large number of variables. | minimum of 3 weeks post operatively | |
Secondary | Determine if any statistically significant differences in biometric data exists between the two groups. | To determine if any statistically significant differences in biometric data exists between the two groups that may allow for pre-operative recognition of those patients who could have enhanced benefits of the Eyhance IOL. This will require multiple regression analysis given the large number of variables. | minimum of 3 weeks post operatively |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT01193504 -
Randomized, Masked Comparison of Bromfenac and Besifloxacin BID With Either Prednisolone BID or Loteprednol 0.5% BID for Prevention of Retinal Thickening and CME Following Phacoemulsification
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00347243 -
Wavefront Analisys and Contrast Sensitivity of Spherical and Aspherical Intraocular Lenses
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04208633 -
Correlation Between Sulcus Anatomy and Other Parameters After Horizontal & Vertical Intraocular Lens (IOLs) Placements
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06041139 -
Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction With Bilateral PanOptix Verses Bilateral Synergy
|
||
Completed |
NCT04533191 -
Binocular Custom Vision Utilizing The Light Adjustable Lens (LAL)
|
||
Completed |
NCT05735990 -
Retrospective Clinical Investigation of the Safety and Performance of 640PM Trifocal IOL Implantation in Patients With Cataract and/or Ametropia (Hyperopia, Myopia) and/or Presbyopia
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04175951 -
Tecnis Eyhance Versus Rayner RayOne Study
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06056154 -
Safety and Efficacy of the Hydrophobic Intraocular Lens AsqelioTM Monofocal With Biaspheric Design
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05531110 -
Comparison of Two Aspheric Intraocular Lenses for Micro-monovision
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01004549 -
An Open-Label Evaluation of Degree of Accommodation in Pseudophakic Patients Bilaterally Implanted With Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03823092 -
Polarization Perception in Health and Disease. Testing a New Sight Test
|
||
Completed |
NCT05226884 -
Intermediate Vision in Patients With Clareon IOLs Compared to Eyhance IOLs
|
||
Completed |
NCT01310127 -
Clinical Outcomes of Bromday (Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution) 0.09% QD vs. Nevanac (Nepafenac Ophthalmic Suspension) 0.1%
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05335408 -
Evaluation of Visual Function After Bilateral Implantation of EDOF IOLs
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04319497 -
Subjective and Objective Refraction in Pseudophakic Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05418153 -
Synergy Lens Outcomes Evaluation
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06065072 -
Comparative Study of the Tomey OA-2000, Tomey CASIA2, and the LenStar LS900
|
||
Completed |
NCT02450799 -
Corrected VA With Long-Term Follow-Up After AcrySof® Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00428363 -
Effect of Optic Edge Design in a Silicone Intraocular Lens on Posterior Capsule Opacification
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04468022 -
Toric Trifocal IOL Treatment With High Astigmatism and Hyperopia vs SMILE Enhancement After Trifocal IOL Treatment
|
N/A |