Pseudophakia Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation of Reading Quality in Three Different Patient Groups (Extended Range Of Vision vs Minimonovision vs Single Focus Distance Vision)
Influence of different ophthalmic conditions after cataract surgery (extended range of vision IOL (EROV) with micromonovision, minimonovision with standard IOL and single focus distance vision with standard IOL) on reading quality.
Reading is a complex function. It requires a proper retinal image that is received by the
brain. There it is analyzed for letter and word recognition and then the semantics is
detected. Reading speed slows down when letters are blurred, or do not have enough contrast
or luminance or when binocular fusion is hampered. It also slows down when the understanding
is difficult, which is why reading one's mother tongue generally is faster than reading a
foreign language. Reading skill is therefore influenced by visuo-motor and cognitive (i.e.
linguistic, personality, learning, ageing) factors. Reading ability is currently evaluated
using various reading tests, which usually have long paragraphs with small print and shorter
ones with larger print, to allow determination of reading acuity. To evaluate sustained
reading performance, and reading speed, the International Reading Speed Texts (IReST) which
contain longer paragraphs with continuous text of fixed size, have been developed. Although
clinical reading tests are thoroughly standardized, a significant inter-individual variation
in reading speed exists, as a result of the high influence of cognitive factors. When
reading, sensorimotor coordination must happen to make a sequence of fixations and saccades
so that new information falls onto the fovea. Eye movement efficiency develops almost in
parallel with reading ability, in terms of speed and accuracy, as the child progresses from a
beginner to a proficient adult reader. Less skilled readers (e.g. children with reading
difficulties) typically make more fixations of longer duration and shorter saccades than
skilled readers. For an adult reader mean fixation duration is around 220 to 250 ms. However,
fixations of variable durations (from 100 ms to over 500 ms) are recorded during a reading
session. Although the distribution of fixation durations varies among individuals, due to
differences in reading skill, age and other cognitive factors, it is never normal; it always
exhibits a pronounced right tail, i.e. an increased frequency of long fixations. Such
distributions can be fitted with an ex-Gaussian function, a convolution of Gaussian (normal)
and exponential functions, which could provide more efficient analysis. The team in
university of Crete recently showed that pre-retinal factors (e.g. text contrast and
luminance) influence the mean of the normal distribution, while cognitive factors affect the
number of fixations and the mean of the exponential distribution of fixation duration, due to
an increased frequency of long fixations. Moreover, inter-individual variation was
significantly improved when analysis was performed separately for visuo-motor vs. cognitive
components, with most of variability being attributed to the mean of the exponential
distribution.
To evaluate functional vision in "simultaneous-image' correction and more specifically visual
performance at near, a functional outcome, such as reading speed and ocular fixation times
during sustained reading, should be measured. Such recordings could then answer the question
how the binocular improvement in reading depends on the difference in acuity between the eyes
and the analysis suggested above could help us to distinguish sensory vs. motor components
especially in patients with reduced contrast sensitivity.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT01193504 -
Randomized, Masked Comparison of Bromfenac and Besifloxacin BID With Either Prednisolone BID or Loteprednol 0.5% BID for Prevention of Retinal Thickening and CME Following Phacoemulsification
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00347243 -
Wavefront Analisys and Contrast Sensitivity of Spherical and Aspherical Intraocular Lenses
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04208633 -
Correlation Between Sulcus Anatomy and Other Parameters After Horizontal & Vertical Intraocular Lens (IOLs) Placements
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06041139 -
Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction With Bilateral PanOptix Verses Bilateral Synergy
|
||
Completed |
NCT04533191 -
Binocular Custom Vision Utilizing The Light Adjustable Lens (LAL)
|
||
Completed |
NCT05735990 -
Retrospective Clinical Investigation of the Safety and Performance of 640PM Trifocal IOL Implantation in Patients With Cataract and/or Ametropia (Hyperopia, Myopia) and/or Presbyopia
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04175951 -
Tecnis Eyhance Versus Rayner RayOne Study
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06056154 -
Safety and Efficacy of the Hydrophobic Intraocular Lens AsqelioTM Monofocal With Biaspheric Design
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05531110 -
Comparison of Two Aspheric Intraocular Lenses for Micro-monovision
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01004549 -
An Open-Label Evaluation of Degree of Accommodation in Pseudophakic Patients Bilaterally Implanted With Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03823092 -
Polarization Perception in Health and Disease. Testing a New Sight Test
|
||
Completed |
NCT05226884 -
Intermediate Vision in Patients With Clareon IOLs Compared to Eyhance IOLs
|
||
Completed |
NCT01310127 -
Clinical Outcomes of Bromday (Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution) 0.09% QD vs. Nevanac (Nepafenac Ophthalmic Suspension) 0.1%
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05335408 -
Evaluation of Visual Function After Bilateral Implantation of EDOF IOLs
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05611073 -
Maximizing Visual Outcomes With Eyhance IOLs
|
||
Completed |
NCT04319497 -
Subjective and Objective Refraction in Pseudophakic Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05418153 -
Synergy Lens Outcomes Evaluation
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06065072 -
Comparative Study of the Tomey OA-2000, Tomey CASIA2, and the LenStar LS900
|
||
Completed |
NCT02450799 -
Corrected VA With Long-Term Follow-Up After AcrySof® Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00428363 -
Effect of Optic Edge Design in a Silicone Intraocular Lens on Posterior Capsule Opacification
|
Phase 4 |