Prosthesis User Clinical Trial
Official title:
Neural Enabled Prosthesis for Upper Limb Amputees
This study is designed to evaluate the feasibility of The Adaptive Neural Systems Neural-Enabled Prosthetic Hand (ANS-NEPH) system.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 15 |
Est. completion date | December 31, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | December 31, 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Unilateral transradial amputation 2. Amputation occurred 9 months ago or more 3. Functional hand contralateral to the amputation 4. Ability and willingness to use myoelectric arm (as determined by prosthetist) 5. 18 years of age or older 6. Ability to obtain transportation to the research site and the clinicians' offices 7. U.S. citizen or permanent U.S. resident 8. Signed the Informed Consent Form Exclusion Criteria: 1. Absence of limb due to birth defect 2. Evidence of denervation of the residual limb 3. Phantom limb pain that is severe enough to impair or restrict activity 4. Any neurological condition affecting motor and/or sensory function that would interfere with use of the intact hand or residual limb (as determined by neurologist) 5. Visual impairment that would affect hand usage during experimental procedures 6. History of chronic infections 7. History of recurring ulcers or blisters on the residual limb 8. Evidence of an active infection, non-healed ulcer, recent history of a healed ulcer (< 3 months) 9. Use of another implanted electrical device (such as a pacemaker or nerve stimulator) 10. Undergoing diathermy therapy of the residual limb 11. History of non-compliance with medical or research procedures or any condition that would limit their ability to comply with study related procedures (self-reported) 12. Self-reported emotional or psychological disorders or history of drug or alcohol abuse or addiction 13. Memory disorders or significant cognitive impairment (self-reported and/or clinical observation during consent and screening procedures) 14. Moderate to severe chronic pain 15. Pregnant or nursing 16. Self-reported sensitivity to material derived from porcine source 17. Enrolled in another investigational research study 18. Any medical or psychiatric condition not otherwise specified (such as uncontrolled high blood pressure, heart or lung disease, active infection, and serious metabolic disorders) that would expose the subject to unacceptable risk and/or limit their ability to perceive meaningful sensation from stimulation of the peripheral nerves of the residual limb. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Walter Reed National Military Medical Center | Bethesda | Maryland |
United States | University of Arkansas | Fayetteville | Arkansas |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville | National Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB), United States Department of Defense |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Safety of the Neural Stimulation System | Documented as the number of treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0. | Up to 104 weeks - post-treatment | |
Secondary | Efficacy: Functionality of implanted system components | Documented as the percentage of implanted electronic units fully operational and the percentage of electrodes intact (having measured impedance values < OR = 30kO) | Up to 104 weeks - post-treatment | |
Secondary | Efficacy: Elicited sensations | Ability of the system to elicit graded sensations documented as the correlation between stimulation intensity (expressed as a percentage of the stimulation range) and reported intensity of the elicited sensation (expressed as a percentage of the range of elicited sensations) | Up to 104 weeks - post-treatment | |
Secondary | Efficacy: Graded control | The ability of the system to enable graded control of a prosthesis measured as the accuracy with which the subject can achieve a specified target level of grasp force or hand opening. Comparing performance with & without sensory stimulation | Up to 104 weeks - post-treatment | |
Secondary | Efficacy: Activity Measure for Upper Limb Amputees (AM-ULA) | The ability of the system to facilitate completion of functional tasks documented by using the AM-ULA. Comparing performance with & without sensory stimulation | Baseline plus up to 104 weeks post-treatment | |
Secondary | Clinical Surveys: Orthotics and Prosthetics User Survey - The Upper Extremity Functional Status (OPUS - UEFS) | The UEFS is a 28-item self-report pertaining to an individual's performance of self-care and daily living skills using the prosthetic hand. UEFS has a 5-point Likert scale where Score Points are 0 = not able, 1 = difficult, 2 = easy, 3 = very easy scores are given. The survey will be used to document changes in participants' functional status and quality of life. | Baseline plus up to 104 weeks post-treatment | |
Secondary | Clinical Surveys: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) | The DASH Outcome Measure is a 30-item (scored 1-5) self-report questionnaire designed to measure physical function and symptoms in people with any of several musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. The survey will be used to measure disability of the upper extremities, and monitor change or function over time. | Baseline plus up to 104 weeks post-treatment | |
Secondary | Clinical Surveys: Trinity Amputation and Prosthetics Experience Scales - Revised (TAPES-R) | This outcome measure is a 54-item self-report, health-related QOL questionnaire. This survey will be used to measure psychosocial processes that are linked with adapting to a prosthesis, to the activity restrictions associated with wearing a prosthesis, and to satisfaction with the prosthesis. Only some sections of the complete version have been included in the survey documents. In specific, we will administer the Psychosocial Scale (15 items) and Satisfaction with the Prosthesis Scale (8 items). | Baseline plus up to 104 weeks post-treatment | |
Secondary | Clinical Surveys: Groningen Questionnaire - Problems After Arm Amputation (GQ-PAAA) | The GQ_PAAA is a 14-item self-report measurement. This survey will be used to document frequency of phantom limb sensation, phantom limb pain, and stump pain. A modified version of this measure has been included in the survey documents. | Baseline plus up to 104 weeks post-treatment | |
Secondary | Clinical Surveys: 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) | This outcome measure is a 12-item self-report questionnaire that provides glimpses into mental and physical functioning and overall health-related-quality of life. This survey will be used to document health-related quality of life. | Baseline plus up to 104 weeks post-treatment | |
Secondary | Clinical Surveys: McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) | This survey will be used to document the quality and intensity of pain that the participant is experiencing. Participants select a single word from each of the 20 groups and then describe their present pain intensity on a scale of 0 to 5. | Baseline plus up to 104 weeks post-treatment | |
Secondary | Clinical Assessment: Adaptive Neural Systems - Phantom Limb Telescoping Assessment (ANS-PLTA) | We have developed this assessment to measure the phantom limb telescoping at the beginning and at the end of each session to track how the length of the phantom limb changes after stimulation within a session and across sessions as reported by the subject. Subjects report where the end of the phantom limb is by pointing at it with the other hand. | Baseline plus up to 104 weeks post-treatment | |
Secondary | Clinical Assessment: The Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) | SHAP is a clinically validated hand function test developed to assess the effectiveness of upper limb prostheses. The SHAP is made up of 6 abstract objects and 14 Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Each task is timed by the subject and recorded on an assessment sheet by the assessor. | Baseline plus up to 104 weeks post-treatment |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06194838 -
Clinical Outcomes With Non-Powered vs. Powered Prosthetic Knees by K2-level Amputees
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03570788 -
HRQoL Among Patients Amputated Due to Peripheral Arterial Disease
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05548322 -
Studies Into Touch in Healthy Humans to Provide Sensory Feedback in Prostheses
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02316262 -
Targeted Reinnervation for Neuromas as a Means to Improve Prosthesis Control in Major Limb Amputation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05870267 -
Biomechanical Assessment of Load Applied on Residuum of Individuals With Limb Loss Fitted With a Prosthetic Limb
|
||
Completed |
NCT03498872 -
Strategic Research Program 17 (VUB Funding)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03530956 -
Evaluation of a Novel Bionic Foot, AMPfoot 4+
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04730492 -
HErnias REparation After Kidney Transplantation Study
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03625921 -
Transfemoral Powered Foot and Physical Therapy Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05190354 -
Post Market Clinical Protocol - Xtremity Polymer Prosthetic Socket System
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04272593 -
Pattern Recognition Prosthetic Control
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05112679 -
Limb Health and Socket Pressure in Response to Powered Ankle Protheses
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04595071 -
Functional Outcomes of Voice Recognition Prosthesis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03329326 -
Comparison of Prosthetic Assessment Tools and Factors Influencing the Outcome
|
||
Terminated |
NCT03575975 -
3D X-ray Motion Analysis of Ankle-foot Motion After Total Ankle Arthroplasty
|
||
Completed |
NCT05048355 -
Metabolic Cost of Walking With Passive vs. Powered Microprocessor Controlled Knees
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05124873 -
Moisture Management Liner At-Home Evaluation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05267639 -
Clinical Outcomes With Passive MPKs vs. Powered Prosthetic Knees
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05749952 -
Digital Weight Bearing Shape Capture Socket Technology
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06052501 -
3D Evaluation of the Lip Support in a Full-arch Implant-supported Rehabilitations
|