All on Four Versus All on Three Implant Treatment Concepts

Prosthesis Durability Clinical Trial

Official title:

All On-4 Versus All o-3 Implant Treatment Concepts for Rehabilitation of Atrophied Mandibular Ridge. A Study of Patient Satisfaction

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05912127
• Other study ID #: A09071221
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 16, 2022
• Est. completion date: June 11, 2023

Study information

• Verified date: June 2023
• Source: Mansoura University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

the evaluation of patient satisfaction of All on-4 versus All on-3 implant treatment concepts rehabilitation of atrophied mandibular ridge.

Description:

Patients will be classified into 2 groups according to the implant treatment concept they received:

• Group 1 (control group); included patients who received All on 4 implant-supported fixed restoration. The patients received 2 inclined implants anterior to the mental foramina and 2 vertical implants in the lateral incisor/canine areas.

• Group 2 (test group); included patients who received All on 3 implant-supported fixed restoration. The patients received 2 inclined implants anterior to the mental foramina and 1 vertical implant in the midline of the mandible.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 30
• Est. completion date: June 11, 2023
• Est. primary completion date: October 9, 2022
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 45 Years to 65 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• 1. All patients already have implants inserted in their mandibular ridges According to the All on 4 or All on 3 concepts.

2. They were healthy, free from any systemic diseases relating to bone resorption such as uncontrolled diabetes or osteoporosis. This was achieved through medical history and clinical examination by the physician.

3. All patients have sufficient inter-arch space. 4. All patients are of angle class I maxillo-mandibular relationships. 5. All patients had maxillary conventional complete dentures.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Any neuromuscular disorders 2. Uncooperative patients

-

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Prosthesis Durability
• Prosthesis Failure

Intervention

Device:
• implant supported fixed full arch prosthesis
the patients will receive screw-retained cast metal-ceramic fixed prostheses that replace lost gingival tissues with pink porcelain.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Egypt	Christine Ibrahim	Mansoura

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Mansoura University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	patient satisfaction	Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a questionnaire based on visual analog scale (VAS)	one year
Primary	crestal bone loss	bone loss was measured around the implants in mm	Two year