Prostate Cancer — Prostasomes as Diagnostic Tool for Prostate Cancer Detection
Citation(s)
1 Gomella LG, Johannes J, Trabulsi EJ. Current prostate cancer treatments: Effect on quality of life. Urology. 2009;73(5, Suppl): S28-S35. 2. Network, N.C.C. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Prostate Cancer, Version 2.2017. [cited 2017 May 31];2017 Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.pdf. 3. Pienta KJ. Critical appraisal of prostate-specific antigen in prostate cancer screening: 20 years later. Urology. 2009;73(5, Suppl):S11-S20. 4. Stamey TA, et al. Prostate-specific antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:909-916. 5. Catalona WJ. Management of cancer of the prostate. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:996-1004. 6. Harvey P, et al. A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of prostate specific antigen. BMC Urol. 2009;9:14. 7. Cramer SD, et al. Association between genetic polymorphisms in the prostate-specific antigen gene promoter and serum prostate-specific antigen levels. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:1044-1053.
16 Carlsson L, Ronquist G, Eliasson R, Egberg N, Larsson A. Flow cytometric technique for determination of prostasomal quantity, size and expression of CD10, CD13, CD26 and CD59 in human seminal plasma. Int J Androl. 2006;29:331-338. 17. Fernández JA, Heeb MJ, Radtke KP, Griffin JH. Potent blood coagulant activity of human semen due to prostasome-bound tissue factor. Biol Reprod. 1997;56:757-763. 18. Fabiani R, Johansson L, Lundkvist O, Ronquist G. Enhanced recruitment of motile spermatozoa by prostasome inclusion in swim-up medium. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:1485-1489. 19. Carlsson L, Påhlson C, Bergquist M, Ronquist G, Stridsberg M. Antibacterial activity of human prostasomes. Prostate. 2000;44:279-286. 20. Rooney IA, et al. Physiologic relevance of the membrane attack complex inhibitory protein CD59 in human seminal plasma: CD59 is present on extracellular organelles (prostasomes), binds cell membranes, and inhibits complement-mediated lysis. J Exp Med. 1993;177:1409-1420. 21. Saez F, Motta C, Boucher D, Grizard G. Antioxidant capacity of prostasomes in human semen. Mol Hum Reprod. 1998;4:667-672. 22. Skibinski G, Kelly RW, Harkiss D, James K. Immunosuppression by human seminal plasma-extracellular organelles (prostasomes) modulate activity of phagocytic cells. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1992;28:97-103.
23 Floryk D, Tollaksen SL, Giometti CS, Huberman E. Differentiation of human prostate cancer PC-3 cells induced by inhibitors of inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase. Cancer Res. 2004;64:9049-9056. 24. Nilsson BO, Egevad L, Jin M, Ronquist G, Busch C. Distribution of prostasomes in neoplastic epithelial prostate cells. Prostate. 1999;39:36-40. 25. Sahlén G, et al. Prostasomes are secreted from poorly differentiated cells of prostate cancer metastases. Prostate. 2004;61:291-297. 26. Fredriksson S, et al. Protein detection using proximity-dependent DNA ligation assays. Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20:473-477. 27. Tavoosidana G, Ronquist G, Darmanis S, Yan J, Carlsson L, Wu D, Conze T, Ek P, Semjonow A, Eltze E, Larsson A, Landegren UD, Kamali-Moghaddam M. Multiple recognition assay reveals prostasomes as promising plasma biomarkers for prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 24;108(21):8809-14. 28. Löf L, Ebai T, Dubois L, Wik L, Ronquist KG, Nolander O, Lundin E, Söderberg O, Landegren U, Kamali-Moghaddam M. Detecting individual extracellular vesicles using a multicolor in situ proximity ligation assay with flow cytometric readout. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:34358. 29. Loudig O, Wang T, Ye K, Lin J, Wang Y, Ramnauth A, Liu C, Stark A, Chitale D, Greenlee R, Multerer D, Honda S, Daida Y, Spencer Feigelson H, Glass A, Couch FJ, Rohan T, Ben-Dov IZ. Evaluation and Adaptation of a Laboratory-Based cDNA Library Preparation Protocol for Retrospective Sequencing of Archived MicroRNAs from up to 35-Year-Old Clinical FFPE Specimens. Int J Mol Sci. 2017; 18(3). pii: E627. 30. Loudig O, Liu C, Rohan T, and Ben-Dov IZ. Retrospective MicroRNA Sequencing: Complementary DNA Library Preparation Protocol Using Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded RNA Specimens. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 2018.
8 Inal JM, Kosgodage U, Azam S, Stratton D, Antwi-Baffour S, Lange S. Blood/plasma secretome and microvesicles. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1834(11):2317-25. 9. Ronquist G, Brody I, Gottfries A, Stegmayr B. An Mg2+ and Ca2+-stimulated adenosine triphosphatase in human prostatic fluid-part II. Andrologia. 1978;10:427-433. 10. Ronquist G, Brody I, Gottfries A, Stegmayr B. An Mg2+ and Ca2+-stimulated adenosine triphosphatase in human prostatic fluid: Part I. Andrologia. 1978;10:261-272. 11. Ronquist G, Hedström M. Restoration of detergent-inactivated adenosine triphosphatase activity of human prostatic fluid with concanavalin A. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1977;483:483-486. 12. Minciacchi VR, Zijlstra A, Rubin MA, Di Vizio D. Extracellular vesicles for liquid biopsy in prostate cancer: where are we and where are we headed? Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017;20(3):251-258. 13. Poliakov A, Spilman M, Dokland T, Amling CL, Mobley JA. Structural heterogeneity and protein composition of exosome-like vesicles (prostasomes) in human semen. Prostate. 2009;69:159-167. 14. Utleg AG, et al. Proteomic analysis of human prostasomes. Prostate. 2003;56:150-161. 15. Carlsson L, et al. Characteristics of human prostasomes isolated from three different sources. Prostate. 2003;54:322-330.
Quantification and Purification of Circulating Prostasomes as Diagnostic Tool for Prostate Cancer Detection
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.
