View clinical trials related to Prone Position.
Filter by:Introduction: Prone position (PP) treatment as a rescue strategy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a technique increasingly used in our daily practice and, as a result of the current health situation due to SARS COV-2, has become the treatment of choice for many patients. Many of the associated complications can be considerably reduced with the implementation of standardized procedures and a team trained and specialized in this technique and its subsequent care. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of the use of Hyperoxygenated Fatty Acids (HOFA) compared to the use of hydrocolloid dressings (HCD) in the prevention of Pressure ulcers (PUs) occurrence in critically ill patients in prone position. Methods: A randomized clinical trial will be conducted to compare the occurrence of PUs and other complications in patients undergoing PP in the ICU of the HUPHM. Two care groups will be formed in which HOFA and hydrocolloid dressings will be used, respectively, following a strict care protocol previously established in the unit. In addition, other variables related to medical and nursing treatment that may influence the appearance of PUs and other complications associated with PP will also be analyzed. Scientific relevance: PUs have a major socioeconomic and quality of life impact on patients. Dressings and topical agents for prevention are widely used, however, it is unclear which treatment is most effective in preventing PUs in the prone patient. Keywords: Prone Position; Nursing care; Pressure ulcer; Fatty acids; Prevention; Complications.
A subset of patients with COVID-19 develops acute respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (1). The use of invasive mechanical ventilation for the treatment of these conditions is associated with high mortality rates (2,3). The use of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNO) and awake prone position (AW-PP) could to decrease the need for endotracheal intubation and other adverse clinical outcomes (4-6). The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical results of the simultaneous application of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy HFNO and awake-prone position in a cohort of patients with severe respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 on relevant clinical outcomes, and to assess risk factors of treatment failure defined as requirement of invasive mechanical ventilation.
The investigator hypothesis is that early implementation of early, awake prone position for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring oxygen therapy will reduce the need for escalation of respiratory support. Escalation of respiratory support is defined as the need for respiratory support with HFNO, NIV or IV.
The burden of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is still on a rising course making a great stress on medical resources throughout the world. Although most of COVID-19 patients require non-invasive oxygenation and ventilation, rapid progression to hypoxemic respiratory failure and then acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) can occur in some COVID19 patients due to prolonged or unaddressed hypoxia. Prone positioning is a common supportive ventilation strategy to improve oxygenation in critically ill patients with ARDS. Recent studies point out the potential benefits of using this strategy for non-intubated awake COVID 19 patients who are hypoxic. Despite several retrospective cohort studies have been conducted to identify impact of the prone positioning in awake non-intubated COVID-19 patients, experimental studies are very rare. This study therefore aims to evaluate the effects of self-prone positioning on oxygenation and physiological outcomes among awake-non intubated patients with COVID-19.
determine the effect of prone positioning on ventilation and perfusion distribution in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome by electrical impedance tomography
This study focuses on the evaluation of various factors repeatedly discussed in relation to the impaired sedation of intubated ventilated COVID-19 patients. The sedation response of >100 moderately to severely affected COVID-19 ARDS was evaluated. The sedation level was measured at the bedside using the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale and ventilator synchrony. The evaluation was performed according to the static evaluation plan with respect to age, storage therapy and organ failure.
Perioperative prone position may be associated with hemodynamic instability. The causes of instability have not yet been precisely elucidated. The aim of this study is to demonstrate physiological changes during prone positioning in healthy volunteers .
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is defined according to the Berlin definition (1) as diffuse lung damage occurring in patients with a predisposing risk factor. Positioning in the prone position (PP) has been shown to decrease mortality in patients with moderate to severe ARDS. However, this technique is not without deleterious effects such as ventilator-associated pneumonia, endotracheal tube obstruction, development of pressure ulcers, and increased workload for the caregivers. There are other positioning techniques such as the "upright" position, which simulates a relative verticality, which allows to increase the effects of the prone position and even in some patients to improve oxygenation without the PP in the acute phase of ARDS. However, given the revolution caused by the use of PP in ARDS patients, verticalization have not been studied in more details. Today, there is a bed on the market that allows patients to be truly upright without having to transfer them to a tilt table. The investigators believe that raising ARDS patients in the acute phase is safe and feasible in routine practice. In this research protocol comparing PP and verticalization in a crossover trial design in acute ARDS patients, the investigators want to show that this technique can be safe and feasible, with the same effects on oxygenation as PP.
The SARS-Cov2 viral pandemic is responsible for a new infectious disease called COVID-19 (CoronaVIrus Disease), is a major health problem. Respiratory complications occur in 15 to 40%, the most serious is acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The management of COVID-19 is essentially symptomatic with respiratory oxygen supplementation in mild forms to invasive mechanical ventilation in the most severe forms. Prone position (PP) reduced mortality in patients with ARDS in intensive care. Ding et al showed that PP and high flow oxygenation reduced the intubation in patients with moderate to severe ARDS. The investigators hypothesize that the use of PP in spontaneously ventilation patients under oxygen standard could decrease incidence of intubation or non-invasive ventilation or death compared to conventional positioning management in medical departments.
Patients suffering from Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) with a prone position (PP) indication will benefit from measurements of radiological and biological kidney injury markers, intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and ventilatory mechanics in supine position (baseline IAP), after 2 hours in PP at the current IAP value, thirty minutes after patients' abdomen suspension in order to resume baseline IAP and after patients' are turned back to supine position.