Affixing Polypropylene Mesh Using Barbed Suture (Quill™ Srs) During

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

1.0 STUDY OBJECTIVE 1.1 PRIMARY OBJECTIVE - To compare two methods of polypropylene mesh attachment during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC): running technique using self-anchoring 1 barbed delayed absorbable suture (Quill™ SRS, Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Vancouver, Canada) versus interrupted technique using 0 non-barbed delayed absorbable suture (PDS II™, Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA).

1.2 SECONDARY OBJECTIVE - To compare laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy anatomic failure rates at 6 months post-operative follow-up using self-anchoring 1 barbed delayed absorbable suture (Quill™ SRS, Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Vancouver, Canada) versus 0 non-barbed delayed absorbable suture (PDS II™, Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA). The investigators will also assess mesh erosion rates, costs, and surgeon satisfaction rates.

2.0 HYPOTHESIS 2.1 Primary: 2.1.a. Attachment of mesh using the running technique with self-anchoring 1 barbed delayed absorbable suture (Quill™ SRS, Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Vancouver, Canada) will be faster than the standard fixation interrupted technique using 0 non-barbed delayed absorbable suture (PDS II™, Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA).

2.2 Secondary: 2.2.a. Attachment of mesh using the running technique with self-anchoring 1 barbed delayed absorbable suture (Quill™ SRS, Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Vancouver, Canada) will be less costly than the standard fixation interrupted technique using 0 non-barbed delayed absorbable suture (PDS II™, Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA).

2.2.b. Failure rates and mesh erosion rates for each technique will be equally low.

2.2.c. Surgeons will prefer the barbed running technique over the interrupted technique based on subjective surgeon satisfaction questionnaires.

Clinical Trial Description

n/a

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Prolapse

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT01551992
Study type	Interventional
Source	Kaiser Permanente
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	November 2010
Completion date	July 2014

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT03609229` - Outcomes After Sacrocolpopexy With and Without Burch to Prevent Stress Urinary Incontinence in 3rd and 4th Degree Apical Uterine Prolapse	N/A
Completed	`NCT04523298` - Use of Non-ablative Vaginal Erbium YAG Laser for the Treatment of Prolapse	N/A
Completed	`NCT04275089` - Early Feasibility Study of the Reia Vaginal Pessary	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT01608568` - Affixing Polypropylene Mesh Using Barbed Suture (Quill™ SRS) During Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy	N/A
Completed	`NCT03307824` - Operative Time During the Use of the Synthetic Glue IFABONDTM in Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04010292` - Enhancing Patient Recall in Urogynecologic Surgery	N/A
Completed	`NCT03400007` - Clinical and Dynamic Floor MRI Evaluation Before and After Prolapse Surgery
Terminated	`NCT00099372` - Long-term Effectiveness of Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Recruiting	`NCT05964881` - PDS Versus Prolene as Suture Material for Vaginal Sacrospinous Hysteropexy	N/A
Completed	`NCT03890471` - Telephone Intervention to Increase Patient Preparedness and Satisfaction Trial (TIPPS): A Randomized Control Trial	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04440475` - Tap Block vs Conventional Pain Medication for Patients Undergoing Robotic Sacrocolpopexy	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04410393` - Sacrocolpopexy and Lateral Suspension Operations
Completed	`NCT03624764` - Assisted Promontofixation Using Glue Versus Promontofixation Using Threads (PROCOL)	N/A
Completed	`NCT03820089` - Evaluation of TP US in Women With Prolapse
Completed	`NCT01779544` - Rehabilitation After Lumbar Disc Surgery: Exercise Therapy and Brief Educational Intervention	N/A
Completed	`NCT00271102` - Surgical Study Comparing 2 Procedures for the Treatment of a Dropped Bladder	N/A
Completed	`NCT05474495` - Transversus Abdominis and Pelvic Floor Muscle Strengthening Exercise Program In Patients With Grade 1 Cystocele	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT00827645` - Uterine Artery Embolization and Pelvic Floor Symptoms
Completed	`NCT01805310` - Pre-operative Bowel Preparation Prior to Minimally Invasive Sacral Colpopexy	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT04099121` - Evaluation of 3D Translabial Ultrasound Imaging for Pessary Size Estimation	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Affixing Polypropylene Mesh Using Barbed Suture (Quill™ Srs) During Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Randomized Controlled Trial (Quill Lsc) — QUILL-LSC

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms